The Overlord
Well-Known Member
Here is Marvel's top ten super villain groups: http://www.marvel.com/news/comicstories.6339.Take_10~colon~_Evil_Alliances
Freedom Force was awesome, but needs to be higher on the list.
Also, most of these choices suck.
Where's the new Thunderbolts, dang it?!
I've always felt that Marvel and DC are mirror opposites in this regard.
Marvel has some really awesome villains who somehow become lesser when they're part of a team --- Dr. Doom is really not a team up guy, and 'you are just a pawn in my grand scheme to get Reed Richards, steal the Power Cosmic and totally get into Sue's pants' does not count.
DC on the other hand has a broader range of villains --- nobody really jumps up and joy when a cover of Batman says 'The Penguin's BACK!!!' --- who somehow become more awesome when they're a team.
Similarly, Marvel teams are made up of heroes who seem lesser without their teams -- let's just be honest and say that a Mr. Fantastic solo series carries just about as much excitement as a Wasp miniseries --- and carry a lot of their charm with how they interact with the teams they belong to.
Of course. I had those exceptions in mind.That's true, but some villains, like Lex Luthor and Baron Zemo are awesome, in part, because of their ability to form and lead teams of villains. Someone like Doom works better alone, though I did like when he joined the AoV team, mainly because he was jerk to the other members and in the end more or less gave the rest of the team the finger, in his own unique way.
Yes. At best, they're just so self-reliant that drawing other people into their plans is only bound to cause complications for themselves. At worst, the jerk wads just get in each other's way either because they're total douches or their interests are so conflicting with one another: It's hard for the guy who wants to destroy the world and the one who wants to rule it to get along.The Overlord said:I think the difference is Marvel villains tend to be more independently minded then their DC counterparts.
Yes. Numbers AND teamwork. I mean, most of the big name DC heroes are so powerful or at the very least, hyper-competent that this becomes necessary. I mean, on their own, each member of the Justice League is pretty much their own ******* superteam, whereas the Fantastic Four members can only ensure their tactical superiority as a team.The Overlord said:Many DC villains are outclassed by the heroes they fight, so they try to rely on strength in numbers to stand a better chance
Similarly, Marvel teams are made up of heroes who seem lesser without their teams -- let's just be honest and say that a Mr. Fantastic solo series carries just about as much excitement as a Wasp miniseries --- and carry a lot of their charm with how they interact with the teams they belong to.
Of course. I had those exceptions in mind.
Yes. At best, they're just so self-reliant that drawing other people into their plans is only bound to cause complications for themselves. At worst, the jerk wads just get in each other's way either because they're total douches or their interests are so conflicting with one another: It's hard for the guy who wants to destroy the world and the one who wants to rule it to get along.
Yes. Numbers AND teamwork. I mean, most of the big name DC heroes are so powerful or at the very least, hyper-competent that this becomes necessary. I mean, on their own, each member of the Justice League is pretty much their own ******* superteam, whereas the Fantastic Four members can only ensure their tactical superiority as a team.
I am of course, being highly generalizing in my above observation of course.That depends on the character really, for the last 5 years we've had a New Avengers team that consists of characters that are all far more interesting in their own ongoings (Iron Fist, Captain America, etc.), or would be more interesting on their own ongoings if they had one (Luke Cage, Spider-Woman, Hawkeye), than they are on a team.
Overlord. I am AGREEing with you.
My top ten would have to be
1. Kingpin's Criminal Organization
2. The Brotherhood of Evil Mutants
3. The Pride
4. The Hellfire Club
5. HYDRA
6. Ultimate Liberators
7. The New Thunderbolts
8. The Horsemen of Apocalypse
9. The Marauders
That list makes me realize.... super villain groups suck and villains are much more interesting solo.
I didn't. I thought you thought I was trying to debate you.I know that, I just taking an opportunity to expand upon my points, I'm not always trying to engage in a debate with you, man. Why did you think that was intention?
This is because Stan Lee and Jack Kirby are kind of retarded in their understanding of threat development.The Overlord said:Anyway, fun question in general, which are the worst super villains groups in MU (or heck DC). Speaking of the Fantastic Four, the 616 Frightful four really suck , Wizard is an idiot. "Let's see the FF regularly defeat Doom and Galactus, so I will pit them against Trapster a man with a glue gun and no common sense. Mwa, ha. ha!" Seriously that group is just not worthy of being the anti FF, the Ultimate Frightful four is way better.
My top ten would have to be
1. Kingpin's Criminal Organization
2. The Brotherhood of Evil Mutants
3. The Pride
4. The Hellfire Club
5. HYDRA
6. Ultimate Liberators
7. The New Thunderbolts
8. The Horsemen of Apocalypse
9. The Marauders
That list makes me realize.... super villain groups suck and villains are much more interesting solo.
Watching a bunch of disfunctional people trying to get along and failing is just fun.