Recent content by Rman

That's exactly how the book explains it. Phase 1 has some timeline issues no matter what and retconning certain things or flat out ignoring them is the only way to have it make sense. It's why Iron Man could potentially fit in 2008, 2009, or 2010.

Technically the news anchor does say "MORE than 15 years ago" so she's still right. I'm sure the line was a product of the show originally planning to release in 2023 (or 15 years after Iron Man's release). The timeline book and actual movie both feature 2008 evidence and I don't see any reason...

I think you can leave Ms. Marvel and Love & Thunder as you have them since they don't give specific dates. I'd just move Ironheart to October after Love & Thunder and split Werewolf by Night into October 31st-November 1st.

The 31st-November 1st. So, grouping the Fall 2025 projects I see it as: Ms. Marvel-Mid-September-Mid-October 2025 (main events end early in the month, the week time jump at the end makes it the middle of the month) Thor: Love & Thunder- Late October 2025 Ironheart- Late October 2025 (depending...

That and they mention the next full moon being in 5 days which lines up with Halloween 2025. Add that it's a Halloween special and the timeline book confirms Fall 2025 it all lines up.

See I'm even fine with no explanation on how the characters didn't blip. Like the 6 OG Avengers they were lucky. Even humanity "moving on" would be fine if there was some acknowledgment that it had even happened in the first place. Plus knowing the behind the scenes of them ignroing Infinity War...

For me it's not so much that they moved on, it's the lack of any reference at all that it had even occurred. I get some people can easily move past it, but to me it just raises red flags on how Marvel Studios felt about the show and whether or not it lined up.

I guess optimism is fine, but at the same time I don't really see them embracing AoS or other Marvel Television shows the way they did the Netflix shows, but I guess we'll see.

I mean personally, I'd be more surprised if they specifically referenced something like Radcliffe's history with them over something entirely new. Think the Darkhold with WandaVision. I just wouldn't get your hopes up this is some huge connection.

I wouldn't be surprised if it's just a reference to the term LMD (Tony mentions them in Avengers so they were confirmed in the MCU before AoS) that doesn't go into the specifics of their use on AoS. Remember it's a "small win".

It also gives a date that places it before the events of the show.

Eh, I don't mind there being a gap where things were "quiet" for the MCU.

I personally don’t see the need for specific dates when the movie doesn’t give anything pointing to any but agree to disagree.

I don’t see how you can say Doomsday doesn’t fit with December when we have no idea what evidence it gives or how it’ll look.

They mention how Endgame was a "few" years ago which to me fits 2026 better than 2025. I don't see anything wrong with Secret Invasion or The Marvels in 2026. It's easy to believe that once the bombing happens people move on from the election and with Ritson still being the active president we...