Search results for query: *

https://marvel.fandom.com/wiki/Earth-25377 Marvel Zombies Halloween is not canon to 2149.

Damn so this confirms it.

If something is advertised as an "official prequel", its probably safe to assume it is canon though.

I think DCU tie-in material should not be assumed canon unless explicitly told it is. It seems this is how James Gunn operates and he is basically DCU's Kevin Feige. I guess that Superman dog biscuit advertisement comic is non-canon as well.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superman:_The_Man_of_Steel_(2002_video_game) Is this game canon to Post-Crisis continuity? It says that it spins off of a comic storyline. It might be a rare non-comic media that is comics canon, but IDK if the comics had condradicted it.

I asked the site runner if the Transformers G1 cartoon will get a designation since it was produced by Marvel Productions. He replied that he was focusing on comic books at the moment.

https://marvel.fandom.com/wiki/Earth-TRN1638 https://marvel.fandom.com/wiki/Earth-1987 According to the author of the series, Predator vs Marvel is Earth-1987. Previously, Earth-1987 was seen in a Exiles comic where She-Hulk replaced Thing as a member of FF. The Handbook writers seem to be...

http://www.marvunapp.com/master/earthteaz.htm Previously, both 51301 and 11035 were listed as first appearing in Thor First Thunder issue 5 in the Appendix site. A while ago, I asked one of the Appendix writers why both have their first appearances listed as issue 5, as one of them would...

Also this Dodge Fantasticar commercial:

I consider this canon since there is nothing condradicting it and is no cheesier than the actual movies.

It might be that different universes have different current years? (Maybe some universes are younger than others, or human civilization emerged a few years later)

How do you attach spoilers tag? @Regsta

I am not too familiar with that continuity but it doesn't seem like the Spider-Geddon short condradicts anything. Some people consider it non-canon due to the fact that someone that looks like Green Goblin from UMS exists in the short (argued in the show's specific fanmade wikia) and apparently...

Usually it is the stuff they contribute officially to a collaboration project that is respected, not Tommy Westphall level stuff. Furthermore, there is also no official ackowledgement from WB that the two share a universe, so... Well going by Google images, office nameplates more often than not...

This is probably the last I am writing on this.

Yeah but this is just one creator out of many. DCEU is a joint project. I wasn't talking about the DC and Marvel Multiverse but rather that Marvel can get away with the Clark Kent cameo because of its genericness. It was a cameo appearance though, wasn't it? And like I said they shied away...

I seriously doubt paying for IP is necessary for a character just because they have the same name and occupation as another when what was shown in Shazam was so generic. Even Marvel Comics occasionally puts Clark Kent easter eggs in their comics, I haven't heard they got into legal trouble over...

*Being an easter egg they didn't even commit fully to, as they shied away from calling her Emma.

I'm sure Emma from Lights Out as an IP is not protected on the same level as Spider-Man or Wolverine. You say IP is more than just the same actor, name and job, what was so descriptive about the character seen in Shazam beyond those qualities? Furthermore, aren't both franchises entirely...