JudgeDreddpool
Well-Known Member
Keep in mind, I'm only up to the Water 7 arc, so I'm not fully caught up. That said, I'm aware of there being a timeskip at some point.
What is?Is it set on another planet or is it another universe altogether?
A lot of the timeline can be put together using bonus material, but some of the dates pre-timeskip don't line up with ones post-timeskip, so you can either ignore the pre-timeskip dates (and count backwards) or keep both but change the timeskip length (which is kind of important to the story)Keep in mind, I'm only up to the Water 7 arc, so I'm not fully caught up. That said, I'm aware of there being a timeskip at some point.
@jhed13 figured you might wanna keep an eye on this, since I'll be starting the thread soon.... if it weren't obvious, it's Jujutsu Kaisen.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jujutsu_Kaisen
Old comment, but I think S.E.A. probably exists within the MCU theme park universe. So... when Red Skull mentioned Hitler searching for trinkets in the desert, he was referring to the events of Raiders of the Lost Ark in that reality.@Pro Bot according to the SEA Wiki, Howard Stark (of Earth 199999) often had encounters with members of the organization
Fun fact, in Honey, I Blew Up the Kid, there is an easter egg of the Ark from Raiders of the Lost Ark in a government warehouseOld comment, but I think S.E.A. probably exists within the MCU theme park universe. So... when Red Skull mentioned Hitler searching for trinkets in the desert, he was referring to the events of Raiders of the Lost Ark in that reality.
https://marvel.fandom.com/wiki/Earth-TRN971
I actually don't, since the opposite, different actors playing the same character, is not considered making something non-canon.If you consider the same actor playing one character as a connection, then Rogue Male, The Tomorrow People, The Dirty Dozen, and the Hitler of the Andes documentary feature the same Adolf Hitler from Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade.
It's logical to assume it doesn't matter in the case of real people, and sometimes even with fictional characters, I agree. However, I'm not sure the comparison here makes sense, since different actors playing the same character usually has to have an intent or story connection. A shared actor, however, is an existing connection already, but yeah, it's not definitive in the case of Hitler here.I actually don't, since the opposite, different actors playing the same character, is not considered making something non-canon.
It's logical to assume it doesn't matter in the case of real people, and sometimes even with fictional characters, I agree. However, I'm not sure the comparison here makes sense, since different actors playing the same character usually has to have an intent or story connection. A shared actor, however, is an existing connection already, but yeah, it's not definitive in the case of Hitler here.
Which campaign setting, specifically? Or did you mean all of them?Is anyone planing on a Dungeons & Dragons Timeline?

Yes, it isthe second part of the Ice Nine Kills video is set in an alternate "real world", the continuity of the creators of that shorts music videos I think.
Honestly, I'm hoping they take shots at how unnecessarily gory the Terrifier movies are.View attachment 3364
I wonder if it'll be David Thornton portraying Art. That would, hilariously, make All Hallows Eve, Terrifier, and Bubkis canon to the Scary Movie Universe, though it's not too unlikely that it'd just be the same as Ghostface, Jigsaw, etc., where they're parody versions.
The return of the most powerful Ghostface.
nah, they are not "unnecessarily gory". They use gore perfectly in what they want to show. That doesn't mean it'll be up to everyone's taste but it is not unnecesarily gory.Honestly, I'm hoping they take shots at how unnecessarily gory the Terrifier movies are.
... let's agree to disagree. I'm not one for the films, since I hate how mean-spirited the kills feel.nah, they are not "unnecessarily gory". They use gore perfectly in what they want to show. That doesn't mean it'll be up to everyone's taste but it is not unnecesarily gory.
I think it's totally necessary for the films that they were trying to make (over-the-top, nonsensical, hilarious and unrealistic violence), but it's okay if it isn't for you.... let's agree to disagree. I'm not one for the films, since I hate how mean-spirited the kills feel.
Again, agree to disagree.I think it's totally necessary for the films that they were trying to make (over-the-top, nonsensical, hilarious and unrealistic violence), but it's okay if it isn't for you.