Blade Cinematic Universe - Timeline

[selfishmisery]

Well, if any of you still have JavaScript (lol) here ya go
https://web.archive.org/web/2011062...fiction.com/web/cybercomics/Blade_Panels.html ^--- link

 

[Rojinn]

It's completely lost to the public and the only panel we have is this:
View attachment 1017

About the Blade Cybercomic, here's a YouTube Video showcasing it:

 

[Pro Bot]

https://marvel.fandom.com/wiki/Earth-42222Alternate timeline where Deacon Frost won.

 

[selfishmisery]

https://marvel.fandom.com/wiki/Earth-42222Alternate timeline where Deacon Frost won.

Interesting that they acknowledged that universe after all these years.

 

[Pro Bot]

Yep. It's a reality that Earth-616 Blade saw after reading the Darkhold. Apparently the V-Wave would have turned all humans into vampires and all superhumans (Avengers, mutants, etc.) into either vampires or humans.

Quite an interesting "what if...?" story.

 

[Pro Bot]

It appears Dracula was found earlier in that timeline as well, and has total supremacy over the European Continent. The comic is set on the second year anniversary of "V-Day", meaning 2000.

Wilson Fisk looks just like Pearl in the story, so I guess there's a risk of becoming that as a vampire if you, perhaps, eat too much or something. Also, recontextualises the Avengers comic in Blade: The Series to be about in-universe heroes, kinda like Tomb of Dracula in Blade: Trinity.

 

[Pro Bot]

Missed this.

 

[Pro Bot]

It appears Dracula was found earlier in that timeline as well, and has total supremacy over the European Continent. The comic is set on the second year anniversary of "V-Day", meaning 2000.

Wilson Fisk looks just like Pearl in the story, so I guess there's a risk of becoming that as a vampire if you, perhaps, eat too much or something. Also, recontextualises the Avengers comic in Blade: The Series to be about in-universe heroes, kinda like Tomb of Dracula in Blade: Trinity.

So, full list of heroes in this universe:
Eric Brooks/Blade
Abraham Whistler
Abigail Whistler
Hannibal King
Marc Spector/Moon Knight
Reed Richards/Mr. Fantastic (T-Shirt Logo Only)
Sue Storm/Invisible Woman (T-Shirt Logo Only)
Ben Grimm/Thing (T-Shirt Logo Only)
Johnny Storm/Human Torch (T-Shirt Logo Only)
Tony Stark/Iron Man (Comic Book Only)
Hank Pym/Yellow Jacket (Comic Book Only)
Hank McCoy/Beast (Comic Book Only)
Vision (Comic Book Only)
Janet Van Dyne/Wasp (Comic Book Only)
Steve Rogers/Captain America (Comic Book Only)
Wanda Maximoff/Scarlet Witch (Comic Book Only)
Thor Odinson (Comic Book Only)
Amadeus Cho (Alternate Timeline)
Kurt Wagner/Citizen V (Alternate Timeline)
Hobie Brown/Prowler (Alternate Timeline)
Silvija Sablinova/Silver Sable (Alternate Timeline)

 

[selfishmisery]

Missed this.

This feels like 2001 Newgrounds "stick figure battle" animations lmao.

 

[selfishmisery]

https://marvel.fandom.com/wiki/Blade_Trinity_Manga_Doujinshi_Vol_1_1
One more. I gotta get that deluxe Blade 3 soundtrack I guess.

 

[Zeitschiene]

Technically it's also an original story. Thoughts?

Wikipedia states Blade II (Video Game) is 6 months after the movie.

I think this should be invluded

 

[Zeitschiene]

Missed this.

Wher Do you guyd find All these random Media Things?

 

[BB10]

Technically it's also an original story. Thoughts?

Wikipedia states Blade II (Video Game) is 6 months after the movie.

When should I watch this in the timeline?

 

[Jozaca]

When should I watch this in the timeline?

Between the first and second movie of Wikipedia is right.
Edit: Sorry, I read Pro Boot message wrong. It should be after Blade II.

 

[Pro Bot]

The Marvel wiki thinks the GBA version is an alt. universe, but of course you don't need to go off of that.

 

[Pro Bot]

There's lots of versions of X-Men: The Official Game that they've placed in different realities too. The main console version is, of course, Earth-10005. I think they're now treating these things more strictly, which I do like honestly.

 

[BB10]

There's lots of versions of X-Men: The Official Game that they've placed in different realities too. The main console version is, of course, Earth-10005. I think they're now treating these things more strictly, which I do like honestly.

I always disliked how back in the day, they would treat obviously non-canon games as canon to the movies.

For example, Amazing Spider-Man 2 movie and the Tumblr Daily Bugle condradicted the first game, but they still insisted that the games were canon.

I mean it would be one thing if two characters with the same codename exists in a single universe (like Silver Samurai in the X-Men game or Blackout in the Ghost Rider game where only their codenames are known and not their real names), I don't think that would be a condradiction. However, if it is like the Amazing Spider-Man games in which considering them as movie canon would mean there are two Aleksei Sytseviches that become Rhinos and two Felicia Hardys that has some relation to Spider-Man, then it becomes silly to pretend the games and movies are one continuity. That's besides the fact that the Amazing Spider-Man 2 game also went out of its way to adapt its respective movie instead of being a sequel like the first game. It took a Twitter post by the game developers confirming it as a seperate continuity, even though that much was obvious in the first place, to make them give the games a TRN.

Also, Marvel Appendix back in the day rarely designated universes for tie-in material. That's another reason why the tie-in games are being acknowledged as seperate canons in the wiki.

I also don't understand their stubbornness for not covering stuff like the Phineas and Ferb Marvel crossover, Disney Infinity and the Simpsons Loki crossover.

In P&F's case, they said since the crossover episode is canon to the main Phineas and Ferb continuity, giving a TRN to them would mean they would have to cover the entire show in the Wiki.

As for Disney Infinity, they said they would have to cover the non-Disney characters in the game as well.

These arguments make zero sense, as they can just link the P&F and Disney Wikis for the non-Marvel characters. Nobody says those have to be covered.

As for the Simpsons crossover, they haven't even acknowledged it.

 

[Jozaca]

I always disliked how back in the day, they would treat obviously non-canon games as canon to the movies.

For example, Amazing Spider-Man 2 movie and the Tumblr Daily Bugle condradicted the first game, but they still insisted that the games were canon.

I mean it would be one thing if two characters with the same codename exists in a single universe (like Silver Samurai in the X-Men game or Blackout in the Ghost Rider game where only their codenames are known and not their real names), I don't think that would be a condradiction. However, if it is like the Amazing Spider-Man games in which considering them as movie canon would mean there are two Aleksei Sytseviches that become Rhinos and two Felicia Hardys that has some relation to Spider-Man, then it becomes silly to pretend the games and movies are one continuity. That's besides the fact that the Amazing Spider-Man 2 game also went out of its way to adapt its respective movie instead of being a sequel like the first game. It took a Twitter post by the game developers confirming it as a seperate continuity, even though that much was obvious in the first place, to make them give the games a TRN.

It was a weird situation, because they didn't say that they were canon, they just had the tie-ins categorized as being from the universes they adapted but, non-canon, instead, of, you know, give them a TRN.

So, for example, in the case of the Spider-Man 3 videogame the article said something like "Universe: Earth-96283 (non-canon)"

I also don't understand their stubbornness for not covering stuff like the Phineas and Ferb Marvel crossover, Disney Infinity and the Simpsons Loki crossover.

In P&F's case, they said since the crossover episode is canon to the main Phineas and Ferb continuity, giving a TRN to them would mean they would have to cover the entire show in the Wiki.

As for Disney Infinity, they said they would have to cover the non-Disney characters in the game as well.

These arguments make zero sense, as they can just link the P&F and Disney Wikis for the non-Marvel characters. Nobody says those have to be covered.

As for the Simpsons crossover, they haven't even acknowledged it.

That's right. I even makes less sense considering that they already do that with the Transformers and G.I. Joe characters. If you go to the Earth-91274 page and in the "Residents" section click on, for example, "Cobra" it will lead to Joepedia's article about Cobra. Simple as that.

 

[Pro Bot]

I always disliked how back in the day, they would treat obviously non-canon games as canon to the movies.

For example, Amazing Spider-Man 2 movie and the Tumblr Daily Bugle condradicted the first game, but they still insisted that the games were canon.

I mean it would be one thing if two characters with the same codename exists in a single universe (like Silver Samurai in the X-Men game or Blackout in the Ghost Rider game where only their codenames are known and not their real names), I don't think that would be a condradiction. However, if it is like the Amazing Spider-Man games in which considering them as movie canon would mean there are two Aleksei Sytseviches that become Rhinos and two Felicia Hardys that has some relation to Spider-Man, then it becomes silly to pretend the games and movies are one continuity. That's besides the fact that the Amazing Spider-Man 2 game also went out of its way to adapt its respective movie instead of being a sequel like the first game. It took a Twitter post by the game developers confirming it as a seperate continuity, even though that much was obvious in the first place, to make them give the games a TRN.

Also, Marvel Appendix back in the day rarely designated universes for tie-in material. That's another reason why the tie-in games are being acknowledged as seperate canons in the wiki.

I also don't understand their stubbornness for not covering stuff like the Phineas and Ferb Marvel crossover, Disney Infinity and the Simpsons Loki crossover.

In P&F's case, they said since the crossover episode is canon to the main Phineas and Ferb continuity, giving a TRN to them would mean they would have to cover the entire show in the Wiki.

As for Disney Infinity, they said they would have to cover the non-Disney characters in the game as well.

These arguments make zero sense, as they can just link the P&F and Disney Wikis for the non-Marvel characters. Nobody says those have to be covered.

As for the Simpsons crossover, they haven't even acknowledged it.

Yeah, the video games are clearly a branched timeline from the end of The Amazing Spider-Man.

 

[Megatron]

there are two Aleksei Sytseviches

actually Nope. The Trophy section of the game had biographies, and stated that the Hybrids were normal animals to which they planted human DNA. So The Amazing Spider-Man 1's Rhino is a normal rhinoceros, not Aleksei. The human DNA they planted was from Aleksei. But still the Rhino is a normal Rhinoceros.