Tomb Raider/Hitman/Kane & Lynch/Mindseye/First Light - Timeline

[Pro Bot]

this video was actually a response to this small webseries way back when whch parodied uber drivers


the first episode featured Maculy Culkin playing a grown up version of Kevin who had been... effected by his childhood experiences

Correct. I would place both in December 2015.

You all know that even if Home Alone was somehow part of the universe Pokemon would not be, right?

Neither Home Alone nor Pokemon are canon here, no.

You seriously believe that? Think its ironie

I'm telling you dude, he regenerated. It's in the movie. I'm not saying he's Wolverine, I'm taking the movie at face value because it's way funnier that way. Also, :'DRYVRS canonizes super powers.

In the Pokemon universes the pokemon exist since the beginning of time, and are present everywhere and are a normal part of the universe as animals are in the real world. Clearly the Home Alone universe is a world where pokemon don't exist, otherwise we would have seen one already.

It is possible that the in-universe film that makes the connection exist in both universe, though, since we only see like 3 scenes of the in-universe series in the movies, and the characters are indoors, so it is possible for them to have been made in both a "Pokemon" and "Pokemon-less" world.

Alternatively, perhaps the very fact that characters survive what would be fatal injuries in the Home Alone films helps the Pokemon link, as the same applies to that series. Ignoring that, which I generally do, the lack of a reference to something is not an example of a contradiction.

It's completely possible that Pokemon do exist in the Home Alone universe and we just never see them because films show you an extremely compromised version of events where a few days are crunched into an hour or two. Characters don't just stop existing between time jumps and we have no idea what might be happening elsewhere during a film. I'm not suggesting we argue that things exist with no evidence, but when evidence suddenly exists, we can't use the lack of a reference previously to dispute it.

I would take it that, if we were to seriously acknowledge the connection, only Detective Pikachu would have any relevance. Not all of Pokemon canon, because that'd be crazy.

 

[JudgeDreddpool]

Soooooo, seeing as Mindseye is out... still gonna put that in, because yikes, is it a hot mess.

 

[Megatron]

Soooooo, seeing as Mindseye is out... still gonna put that in, because yikes, is it a hot mess.

they confirmed that it will have a connection with Hitman, so unfortunaly yes.

 

[Megatron]

I Guess you have now 3 way to play the 1st game:

Tomb Raider I Remastered
Tomb Raider Anniversary
Tomb Raider: Legacy of Atlantys

Also Catalyst Is def set post-underworld and according to the trailer could Also be Lara's final Adventure, she's def old, and It have a "old woman Lara" vibe.

 

[Megatron]

so if we think that, TRI is a combination of all 3 version, the canon version of events would be IMO:

Legacy of Atlantis: Complete Game.
Anniversary: Narratives elements exclusive of this version.
Remastered: Lara's Home and the 2 DLCs.

(And I wanted to return to this, after finishing ACIII, well I guess I need to wait for the remake.... Damn you SE, couldn't you remake TRII?)

 

[Megatron]

I heard that the Mindseye/Hitman crossover has been delayed (please IOI CANCELL IT!).

Uhm I mean.... oh I definetly hope that it is done and so the game stays canon... yeah yeah.

 

[Megatron]

also for Tomb Raider, if Legacy of Atlantis doesn't have a reimagining of the DLC too, would you consider the DLC of the OG game canon or nope?

 

[Rojinn]

also for Tomb Raider, if Legacy of Atlantis doesn't have a reimagining of the DLC too, would you consider the DLC of the OG game canon or nope?

Hmm, I personally would keep it canon as long as it doesn't contradict anything.

 

[Megatron]

as for now I'll add the OG + Annyversary + LoA

 

[Megatron]

UPDATE #1 - EVERYTHING FROM 1996 HAS BEEN ADDED!

 

[Megatron]

Guys I was thinking about the reimagining titles and the common assumptions is that they're going to reimagine all the games from TR I to TRA.

But what if that's not the case? Like, I can't see a reimagining of Chronicles as I feel like it would be a waste of time for them, and anyways they released 2 Remastered collections of TR I to VI, BUT strangely the year we were expecting a collection for the LAU trilogy, it didnd't come.

So what if the reimagining titles are all about the LAU trilogy?

Ik what you're thinking now: "If that's the case why they remastered the 1st one too?" well can you imagine the scandal if they released the collections missing the very 1st game? Also since Natla is the Villain of Underworld it's fitting that they'd start with the 1st game.

And tbh, the LAU are the games that really need a reimagining thanks to the contradictions about Lara's parents and her backstory; (also not related, but if you go and check the announcement SE did in 2021 for the unified timeline with their guide, you can see that they always had the classic games and LAU trilogy as being the same canon and not a reboot, eh?) while the classic series never had really a need for one aside from updating designs and gameplay, but you can close an eye on the designs and you'll get used to the rusty gameplay after a while.

So, in conclusion, I think they'll just reimagine the LAU trilogy, while the Remastered versions of TR II to VI will remain the used ones for the newly Unified Timeline.

P.S. If I predict this, I demand a statue hahaha.

 

[Megatron]

P.P.S. I really love that if after Catalyst we get other 2 games, TR can be divided into 5 sets of trilogies:

Survivor Trilogy (TR, RotTR, SotTR)
Original Trilogy (TRLoA, TRII, TRIIIAoLC)
Von Croy Trilogy (TRIVLR, TRC, TRAoD)
Natla Trilogy (TRLoA [Again], TRL, TRA)
Whatever it will be identified Trilogy (TRC, TRCS1, TRCS2)