I do the same. I always see The Incredible Hulk after Iron Man 2 in other timelines and always feel it works better last since it ends the latest. Plus it makes sense to go from Iron Man 2 to A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to Thor's Hammer and The Incredible Hulk into The Consultant.
Yeah I do it this way as well. Both Thor and TIH have to occur after IM2, due to the footage in the Fury meeting and the Consultant setup. But with Coulson leaving literally in the middle of IM2 to basically go to Thor, it makes the films more seemless watching them back to back and then adding TIH on afterwards. TIH happens all over both films, but the Fury meeting footage is simply an easter egg for people to spot, while the consultant is a legit setup point for TIH's ending.
I don't agree with everything he says, but going with when Korg is telling the story or a time jump during the epilogue is really all there is for Love & Thunder's Disney + placement. Whether you see it as 2024 or 2025, October 2025 simply doesn't work for the movie's main events. With a project as recent as She-Hulk confirmed for the book, I'm sure the timeline will once and for all explain where Marvel Studios sees Love & Thunder. Whether I personally agree or disagree.
Either way I see it as a bad thing. Either A they don't care that much about where Love and Thunder went and just put it after Ms. Marvel (which is what I think happened) which is stupid or they're basing it off of Korg telling a story, which is also stupid
I don't think the movie itself really had an idea where it was taking place. Beyond the basics of its after Endgame but before the Guardians Holiday Special and Vol 3. Given how they didn't just place Multiverse of Madness and Wakanda Forever as the most recent things on the timeline and matched the evidence shown in those films, I feel like there has to be some reason they chose to place Love & Thunder where they did.
Also do the same for these reasons. Plus there’s direct references to the super soldier program, so it leads into Cap 1 nicely. (Although I guess Thor 1 had the tesseract stinger, but that’s more of an Avengers lead-in).
.Actually the 10 Million copies sold one is a great point. The age thing can kinda go either way depending on which numbers you listen to. But 10 Million sold written on the back of the book during the initial book tour seems unlikely if I'm not mistaken.
I think it could fit either 2025 or 2026 and it would cause no problem. The only problem I see is it being placed by Disney+'s timeline which we know its unaccurate but until new information releases I'm going with July 2026
I feel like it has to be 2026 at this point. If Scott is going on his book tour during Wakanda Forever, chances are the book is just coming out. (October 2023- Endgame happens, 2024- Scott writes his book, May 2025- Book is released). I think it'd be extremely unrealistic for 10 million copies to sell within May-July 2025, no matter how popular the book is. Giving it around a year and 2 months works better IMO. I think Holiday content like Hawkeye and the Guardians special are good gauges on what year Marvel sees projects taking place, whether we disagree or not. And placing it after the Holiday Special, makes me feel they see it as 2026 and so far I don't see anything that contradicts that.
Damn that sucks. I mean if they're gonna remove a Marvel show Inhumans was right there lolAnyone else noticed that Disney+ removed Runaways?
