Another video from Geekritique up, I haven't seen it but figured I'd put it here in case anyone was interested
I mean Thor is "off world" a lot. I wouldn't necessarily look at FFH as being a specific reference to Love & Thunder. I mean I originally thought it was a reference to him being with the Guardians. And there's some points in that video that I personally disagree with, but given we've settled with 2024 here, I'll leave it at that.He covers basically everything we've already said here the past few weeks. Placing it in 2024 before MK. About the only thing he didn't mention that I thought of while watching it was that Peter asks Fury in FFH about Thor and Fury responds that he's off-world, which given LAT's ending, he would be.
Yes, very true.I mean Thor is "off world" a lot.
Yeah, the fact we've gotten more guesstimate type of comments recently from directors, makes me wonder just how aware those behind the scenes are of when exactly a project is taking place. I get the Groot thing, but given he's a fictional being, I don't think we can 100% confirm how his growth works.So finally got a chance to watch the video. Lines up with what we've found which is always nice. Couples things I wanted to comment on
Taika Waititi's comment on when Love and Thunder just shows why we shouldn't take directors comments on this stuff seriously. I know he's a goofy guy but this shows how little they know about their timeline placement. Even Gunn's comments show he doesn't know exactly where GotGV3 is falling.
I think the fact that Groot hasn't seemed to age much between now and Endgame does point to it being closer to it then the GotGHS which I think is likely going to take place Christmas 2025. I didn't even think to use Groot's age as a way to place the film. Was this brought up on here before and what do you guys think of it?
I do definitely think the break up has to be Pre-Civil War as if Thor was living with Jane then the Avengers likely would've known where Thor was at the time. But the magazine's are the only thing that I believe gave us a month to work from giving us a nice May date which I think lines up a little too perfectly.
I admit I was offline for a lot of the Love and Thunder placement debate and I missed a lot of that so sorry if I'm throwing out things that were already brought up.
I honestly don't think they have a clue. I think they have a role with the Disney + timeline but don't really use hard evidence. They say they have a timeline keeper and a scroll, so why not release it? Didn't Feige say at one point they were going to?Very fair points especially on Groot and the Post-Endgame feel. I would definitely like Marvel to come forward with a little statement on wtf they are doing there tho.
I don't recall them saying they were going to release the timeline scroll but **** if they did I'd be stoked.I honestly don't think they have a clue. I think they have a role with the Disney + timeline but don't really use hard evidence. They say they have a timeline keeper and a scroll, so why not release it? Didn't Feige say at one point they were going to?
I still remember the mess after Homecoming's release. I used to get downvoted on Reddit all the time for explaining why 8 Years Later was wrong and why Avengers had to be in 2012. It was so validating when Infinity War confirmed it had been 6 years and even more so when Endgame flat-out showed the 2012 title card.
It may not have been the scroll, but Feige did at one point say they had a timeline they were going to release to the public. I think it was meant to be in "The Story of Marvel Studios" book but when it was released, there was nothing about the timeline.I don't recall them saying they were going to release the timeline scroll but **** if they did I'd be stoked.
Also **** reddit, after all these years it's just as bad on there when it comes to timelines even after all the **** ups. Whenever anything timeline related goes there I keep my mouth shut and come here lol
I had a little bit of that with my friends too believe it or not. I tried to explain to them that the 8 years later was impossible because that would have implied Civil War was wrong with Vision stating Iron Man was 8 years ago too. Both films came out the same year, how can Iron Man 1 and Avengers take place in the same year...I still remember the mess after Homecoming's release. I used to get downvoted on Reddit all the time for explaining why 8 Years Later was wrong and why Avengers had to be in 2012. It was so validating when Infinity War confirmed it had been 6 years and even more so when Endgame flat-out showed the 2012 title card.
They did actually release a timeline 'once' and it was hilariously wrong too. It was in the 10 Years book. It corrected Homecoming but screwed up Black Panther.It may not have been the scroll, but Feige did at one point say they had a timeline they were going to release to the public. I think it was meant to be in "The Story of Marvel Studios" book but when it was released, there was nothing about the timeline.
That book was unofficial and the confusion came from people thinking it was the official one and therefore the timeline in it was the one Feige was talking about (it wasn't).They did actually release a timeline 'once' and it was hilariously wrong too. It was in the 10 Years book. It corrected Homecoming but screwed up Black Panther.
Link to Timeline
If Moon Knight were 2025, it would be around 18 months since Endgame. I think the GRC would still be active then. And wouldn't be surprised if we see it's still around in the future.Rewatching Moon Knight, and having the GRC still around makes me feel it's closer to Endgame rather than further.
In FatWS the GRC was already close to bringing back all the displaced people to their homes, so it would make less sense to have the GRC still be a thing 2 years later.
While that could be the case, I think personally The Dark World is placed before Iron Man 3 due to the opening taking place shortly after The Avengers, but either way still makes the timeline a bit of a bitch to use to place the main events of a film unfortunately.Honestly, a part of me wonders if Disney+ is basing its placement for Love & Thunder on when Korg is telling the story rather than the events within the said story. The same thing could be theorized with Iron Man 3 being set after The Dark World due to Tony telling the story to Bruce at a time past the events of The Dark World. In both cases, the movies are technically recapping actual events rather than us seeing them in "real-time". Not saying this is exactly what's going on and if it were the case, it'd be nice to see clarification, but I could see it making sense.
Honestly, one of the reasons I'm personally going with Love & Thunder in 2025. 2024 places it in the middle of TFATWS and given the movie doesn't necessarily confirm that time frame, I prefer to not have to figure out a breakdown of where it is compared to TFATWS. Especially since I doubt there was any intention for them to be that close together. That's just me though. I guess if you had to, you could assume the main events after Thor arrives in New Asgard happen between the ending of TFATWS and the beginning of Far From Home (around late May/early June 2024).Does anyone have any opinions on the placements of Falcon and Winter Soldier and Love and Thunder? They both happen close to each other, but I don't know how to best place TFATW without more precise dating. (I think the placement of Love and Thunder alongside it is a bit awkward)
FatWS seems to be April/May and LaT seems to be May/June so I personally am going with FatWS, LaT, MK, FFH, NWH, etc.Does anyone have any opinions on the placements of Falcon and Winter Soldier and Love and Thunder? They both happen close to each other, but I don't know how to best place TFATW without more precise dating. (I think the placement of Love and Thunder alongside it is a bit awkward)
Honestly, if it's a montage of events, I would place almost all of it in April, and the very last bit of the montage in May.Does anyone have any opinions on the placements of Falcon and Winter Soldier and Love and Thunder? They both happen close to each other, but I don't know how to best place TFATW without more precise dating. (I think the placement of Love and Thunder alongside it is a bit awkward)
Reddit is the anus of the internet.Loved the shade that they threw at Reddit lol
Terrible memes, negativity and conspiracy. That sounds about right.
I agree with the reasoning of whatever makes it so Thor: Love and Thunder and Moon Knight fit together so as the "gods" from one don't show up in the other.Why do we want to move Moon Knight to 2024 again? It fits with both 2024 and 2025. We choose to place it in 2025 because the Disney+ timeline places it after Hawkeye.
It's not like we're saying that the Disney+ timeline is accurate by placing it in 2025. We're saying that, until further evidence comes out, we don't have anything else to go by. It's basically the lowest tier semi-official source.
Thor: Love and Thunder is a little more leaning into 2024, so we can ignore the crappy timeline.
I'm waiting for you guys to all tell me. My brain no worky. I don't even know what a "Moon phase" is, and how would someone know how they will be in years that haven't happened yet?Like this post for Thor and Moon Knight in 2024.
Love for Thor and Moon Knight in 2025.
Haha for Thor in 2024 and Moon Knight in 2025.
I agree with the reasoning of whatever makes it so Thor: Love and Thunder and Moon Knight fit together so as the "gods" from one don't show up in the other.
I'm waiting for you guys to all tell me. My brain no worky. I don't even know what a "Moon phase" is, and how would someone know how they will be in years that haven't happened yet?
Hmm, I never really paid any attention to any of that, nor even noticed the actual moon in the show, like, at all.To put it basically, when we look at the moon in the night sky, it has different shapes. It isn't always a full moon and it isn't always a crescent moon. The shapes form a pattern that has been observed and, using this pattern, we can predict the shape of the moon on future dates.