Marvel Cinematic Universe - Timeline (Part 5)

selfishmisery said:
He browses here occassionally too iirc
Click to expand...
hmm possible but im not super sure, within the past maybe 3 months i found and rewatched his post-aquaman 2 dceu wrap-up video and it was a bit outdated so i sent him some stuff from the thread here for a more definitive placement of blue beetle and aquaman 2 in an email and he seemed like he didnt know about it
 
Pro Bot said:
Why don't we permanently destroy the MCU instead? Serves them right for their self-importance, trying to designate it Earth-616. I'd rather the MCU is made meaningless null and void than the Raimiverse or the Fox universe. Fuck the MCU for killing off Human Torch, while we're at it. Killed him off for a humiliating joke.
Click to expand...
Bro got into a fist fight with Kevin Feige
 
stphylcccs said:
Not gonna lie, I'm kinda sick of the good guys always winning. It's unrealistic, and has just gotten rid of all stakes. I'd love for something to happen like this, even if they nulled it like Endgame did with the Snap. And destroying other universes (even if popular) would (in my opinion) be better staying gone, otherwise it's just lazy writing, especially when they probably won't get any more additions anyway. You can still watch the movies, it isn't like they're gone, they just… wouldn't have a universe anymore
Click to expand...
Killing off well-loved universes just for shock value and hyping up the new guy is cheeks.

Just don't touch Legacy universes, they can be around and not be touched, the creatives aren't being held at gunpoint. And more importantly it'd distance the MCU from relying on nostalgia without trampling on it.

I'd never want "upping the stakes" to amount to "destroy the universe because I'm sick of good guys winning"
 
barryh said:
See:
Ironheart (4 months ago)

See: Logan (2017)
Click to expand...
Ironheart is a great example of personal stakes and the hero "losing" without throwing "heh thing you like? Fucking dead and we're serious!"

And it'd be so much better if Ironheart Season 2 wasn't already gunned down behind a shed
 
The concept of the TVA letting the Chronicoms do anything, all the way down to launching Project Insight decades earlier, just to step in when SHIELD wins is hilarious
 
BabyBomber said:
The concept of the TVA letting the Chronicoms do anything, all the way down to launching Project Insight decades earlier, just to step in when SHIELD wins is hilarious
Click to expand...
It made the Agents their best selves.

No telling what saved them from the Blip. I guess the Monoliths.
 
BabyBomber said:
The concept of the TVA letting the Chronicoms do anything, all the way down to launching Project Insight decades earlier, just to step in when SHIELD wins is hilarious
Click to expand...
If the multiverse is important to the flow of their sacred timeline, it makes sense that they'd let it exist for a period of time. If that timeline didn't exist at all, then the MCU post-2019 would be a branch.
 
Although we don't actually know if that time travel was registered for the TVA in any "2019" pre-Loki setting, since their internal timeline isn't 1/1 with regular time. Branches aren't created chronologically for the TVA, so a branch created in 2019 going back to 1931 wouldn't necessarily register before Loki S1 and could happen at any point.
 
Anything pre-Endgame is business as usual for the TVA under "He Who Remains".

2023 is a pivotal year across the multiverse and when the MCU starts branching out.
Of course, Null-Time Zone is outside of that so centuries could pass in that realm and only a minute passes on the Earthly Plane.

A Bit of Everything's video I posted in the previous page gets into that in a well-said manner.
 
As for when He Who Remains got into power, 100% after the 2015 Secret Wars event in the comics side of things.

Comic and MCU TVA didn't "integrate" until after Loki s2.
 
Assuming the TVA's time becomes synced with the MCU (as stated in the Bit of Everything video) would you consider not having it in its own section of the timeline, instead in line with the rest of the MCU, with a [TVA] footnote?
 
stphylcccs said:
Assuming the TVA's time becomes synced with the MCU (as stated in the Bit of Everything video) would you consider not having it in its own section of the timeline, instead in line with the rest of the MCU, with a [TVA] footnote?
Click to expand...
No thats not how that works. 2023 was the beginning, the sync point when Loki arrived in the TVA dimension. Events spiraled from there but there is no set year from that point on.

Loki s2 is even set after The Marvels on the official MCU D+ viewing order.
Whatever that means, I do not know but there is definitely events unfolding in the 3rd dimension while the Temporal Loom is going nuts. Meaning it may or may not be synced with 2023 at that point.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Back
Top