Timeline Hub

AN ORDER FOR ALL THE EPISODES
I extensively tried looking for one of these, so I could add it to my Slasherverse (movie/TV only, sorry!) and I found quite a few websites on it, though all with conflicting orders. I think does just alternate between the 2 shows, though every time some episodes follow on from another you’d do those one after the other, without a Hercules episode in between (or vice versa). I honestly didn’t even know there were 1940s episodes, so I’ve no clue where they’d go, sorry.

Ask @BMarrow I think he added the shows, comics and animated movie to his Slasherverse (I presume this was based on some sort of premise)
 
Curious, but has anyone here ever attempted to chart out a viewing order for the Slenderverse? Found a watch order online, but not sure if anyone here has ever shown interest in charting out this 'verse.
 
I doubt it'll get a timeline (soon), but, well, it's a somewhat interesting series. I'm sure I'm not the only one who saw that trailer featuring Ant-Man and Steve.

1997 - Anaconda (1997)
1999 - Lake Placid
2004 - Anacondas: The Hunt for the Blood Orchid
2007 - Lake Placid 2
2008 - Anaconda 3: Offspring
2009 - Anacondas: Trail of Blood
2010 - Lake Placid 3
2012 - Lake Placid: The Final Chapter
2014 - Anaconda: The Writer's Cut
2015 - Lake Placid vs. Anaconda
2018 - Lake Placid: Legacy
2024 - Anaconda: Cursed Jungle
2025 - Anaconda (2025)
Having seen all these films now (which... was quite a choice), they are actually very lore consistent with each other. Lake Placid: Legacy is NOT a reboot like wikipedia says. It's a sequel set in a new location that explains where the crocodiles came from. A character is mentioned to have taken the crocodiles to Lake Placid (Black Lake), Maine 25 years ago, which would be 1993. That's 6 years before Lake Placid takes place. It's clearly in the same continuity.

The chinese-language instalment, Anaconda: Cursed Jungle, is not a remake either. I can accept the term reboot, but it isn't really like the first film at all. It doesn't contradict anything, so throwing it in the same timeline makes perfect sense. Actually, they're all extremely lore consistent considering half of them are Syfy films. I appreciate that.
 
Having seen all these films now (which... was quite a choice), they are actually very lore consistent with each other. Lake Placid: Legacy is NOT a reboot like wikipedia says. It's a sequel set in a new location that explains where the crocodiles came from. A character is mentioned to have taken the crocodiles to Lake Placid (Black Lake), Maine 25 years ago, which would be 1993. That's 6 years before Lake Placid takes place. It's clearly in the same continuity.

The chinese-language instalment, Anaconda: Cursed Jungle, is not a remake either. I can accept the term reboot, but it isn't really like the first film at all. It doesn't contradict anything, so throwing it in the same timeline makes perfect sense. Actually, they're all extremely lore consistent considering half of them are Syfy films. I appreciate that.
Cursed Jungle quite literally expands on what we knew about anacondas from previous instalments. (And obviously that big ass snake at the end XD)
 
Having seen all these films now (which... was quite a choice), they are actually very lore consistent with each other. Lake Placid: Legacy is NOT a reboot like wikipedia says. It's a sequel set in a new location that explains where the crocodiles came from. A character is mentioned to have taken the crocodiles to Lake Placid (Black Lake), Maine 25 years ago, which would be 1993. That's 6 years before Lake Placid takes place. It's clearly in the same continuity.

The chinese-language instalment, Anaconda: Cursed Jungle, is not a remake either. I can accept the term reboot, but it isn't really like the first film at all. It doesn't contradict anything, so throwing it in the same timeline makes perfect sense. Actually, they're all extremely lore consistent considering half of them are Syfy films. I appreciate that.
I love that the new Anaconda is so inline with every previous film and the novel like wow. altho you technically can interpret the film 2 ways...
 
I love that the new Anaconda is so inline with every previous film and the novel like wow. altho you technically can interpret the film 2 ways...
Basically, there's an in-universe movie called Anaconda in the 2025 film that stars serveral actors that were in the 1997 film. Since we never see any footage of it and the characters that those actors played aren't named, you can easily say that the new instalment is the twelve film in the original Anaconda universe (six Anaconda films, five Lake Placid films, and Lake Placid vs. Anaconda) rather than essentially the Anaconda version of Wes Caven's New Nightmare.

Think Scream and Stab... or A Nightmare on Elm Street being a canon film in Freddy's Nightmares.
 
I recall us discussing the Friday the 13th 2009 film as being in the same continuity as the original based on statements by the writers and producers (thus... Transformers is Slasherverse, I guess?). Well, what other franchises are there where this is the case?

Texas Chainsaw Massacre, obviously. The Hewitts and the Sawyers are different people, so they can exist in the same universe. The similarities can be chalked up to the Illuminati's plan to spread fear.

Child's Play (2019) was referenced in the TV show briefly, so it could be the same universe despite a few characters sharing the same name. It's harder to fit, though.

I honestly didn't think to check this, but Black Christmas (2006) and Black Christmas (2019) don't really contradict the 1974 film. "Billy" in the 1974 film is actually supposedly Kent Kingsley after the events of The Toolbox Murders. If he's a different character, then Billy Lenz could just be an unrelated character with a similar MO. It's weird that they both moan about this Agnes person, though. Other than Billy, none of the characters from the original film are "remade". As for the latest film... completely new characters.
 
Maybe for the 2019 Child’s Play film, it’s probably a similar situation with Nosferatu 1922 and 2024 happening and sharing the same universe even though characters share the same names
 
Maybe for the 2019 Child’s Play film, it’s probably a similar situation with Nosferatu 1922 and 2024 happening and sharing the same universe even though characters share the same names
Technically, the original Nosferatu is only connected by a UM-branded short film. You're correct, but I think that was an accident.
 
Last edited:
I recall us discussing the Friday the 13th 2009 film as being in the same continuity as the original based on statements by the writers and producers (thus... Transformers is Slasherverse, I guess?). Well, what other franchises are there where this is the case?

Texas Chainsaw Massacre, obviously. The Hewitts and the Sawyers are different people, so they can exist in the same universe. The similarities can be chalked up to the Illuminati's plan to spread fear.

Child's Play (2019) was referenced in the TV show briefly, so it could be the same universe despite a few characters sharing the same name. It's harder to fit, though.

I honestly didn't think to check this, but Black Christmas (2006) and Black Christmas (2019) don't really contradict the 1974 film. "Billy" in the 1974 film is actually supposedly Kent Kingsley after the events of The Toolbox Murders. If he's a different character, then Billy Lenz could just be an unrelated character with a similar MO. It's weird that they both moan about this Agnes person, though. Other than Billy, none of the characters from the original film are "remade". As for the latest film... completely new characters.
Oh, Leprechaun: Origins too. That shitty film doesn't even feature Leprechauns. I remember doing research on it. It's literally completely unrelated except for being in the same franchise... which actually works in its favour towards being canon, ironically.
 
Isn’t their a Hawaii Five 0 (remake) episode that’s also kind of a sequel to an episode from the original show with the art thief
 

Latest posts

Back
Top