I'm not getting in this argument. Chill.
Proceeds to post two videos in order to continue arguing
What are you starting this argument for? Here's how that'll go:
I'd get Caple's quote where he, unprompted, states that Rise of the Beasts preserves the events of Transformers (2007).
You'll bring up a quote where he says it's a reboot, then I'll bring up that he goes on to explain that it is connected and is more of a soft-reboot.
You'll bring up Bumblebee coming to Earth from Cybertron instead of being there since WW2, then I'll bring up that Ironhide (or someone else) was on Earth before 2007 in The Last Knight despite coming to Earth for what seemed to be the first time in said 2007 movie.
It will be the Unicron argument next, so I'll bring up that he's from the future in Rise of the Beasts, meaning Unicron is either from after The Last Knight or from an alternate timeline.
I'd bring up all of Di Bonaventura's quotes, of which there are many, then you'll say that his opinion doesn't matter (?).
I'd show Knight saying that he wanted Megatron to be in Bumblebee but realised he's frozen on Earth due to the 2007 movie and didn't do it because of the continuity.
I'll then mention all the connections. Sector 7, Seymour Simmons, the licence plate in Bumblebee matching Transformers (2007) exactly, the motion comic having Megatron frozen in ice, the second short video on the Bumblebee blu-ray featuring John Cena referencing NBE-1 (Megatron's designation in 2007), and that new comic using the IDW movie timeline designation and showing Cliffjumper being saved during Bumblebee.
Why not, instead, we just settle it. You have your timeline, I have mine. I'll help you with placements, you can help me with placements, we treat each other with some respect. Right?