Lost boys 2 : The Tribe

SSJmole

Face-Punching As Foreign Policy
Joined
Aug 16, 2005
Messages
19,091
Location
UK
Not much is known except it is happening , It's direct to dvd (which could be bad) and that's it.


I don't normally go for direct to dvd sequald but it's bloody lost boys. It HAS to be good.
 
Oh no. . . no it doesn't.

No it doesn't.

How can they possibly **** up Lost boys.



oh and according to wiki

"On January 17th, 2007, it was revealed that Warner Bros. was beginning production on a number of straight-to-video sequels for their existing library of franchise friendly films. Among these productions is "The Lost Boys 2", which begins shooting in Vancouver in June 2007"

So there could be more!
 
How can they possibly **** up Lost boys.



oh and according to wiki



So there could be more!

99.999999999% of all direct-to-DVD films suck ***. Take American Psycho 2: All American Girl, Hollow Man 2, and all of the Air Bud, MVP, Beethoven, and Disney sequels.

I hear they're making a third Bill and Ted movie, direct-to-DVD. It doesn't have Keanu Reeves, Alex Winter (who was in Lost Boys), or George Carlin, and appears to be a prequel. Tell me that doesn't sound like the ****tiest **** ever.
 
Last edited:
99.999999999% of all direct-to-DVD films suck ***. Take American Psycho 2: All American Girl, Hollow Man 2, and all of the Air Bud, MVP, Beethoven, and Disney sequels.

So? Not all direct to dvd films and sequels suck , Infact there has been an increase in quality in dvd films resonatly so who knows?


I'm a lost boy fan so i'm glad to have a sequal
 
Lost Boys is great, but without the Coreys and Kiefer this really doesn't have anything going for it. Even Joel Schumacher won't touch this.
 
Famous last words.

Because "How can they possibly **** up [instert title here]" is just begging for humiliation later on.


:lol: I know I tend to say that a lot and get :oops: e.g [about fantasic four 4 2] "it has galactus , how can they **** it up" (not sure if that was here or another site but yes I said that. and I was soooo wrong.


But I have to get it right once.


By taking that exact attitude with it.

"Screw putting money and effort into this, it's Lost Boys, it'll be good no matter what".


I see your point.



but still Lost boys. I'm exited.
 
I hear they're making a third Bill and Ted movie, direct-to-DVD. It doesn't have Keanu Reeves, Alex Winter (who was in Lost Boys), or George Carlin, and appears to be a prequel. Tell me that doesn't sound like the ****tiest **** ever.

If that is true I will cry. I swear to go I will cry.
 
But it's not the Lost Boys that you know. Pretty much everything from the first Lost Boys is gone, except the vampires and possibly California. Keep that in mind.

If its really subtitled The Tribe I'd be surprised if it was set in California. Sounds very much like an In Name Only sequel.
 
But it's not the Lost Boys that you know. Pretty much everything from the first Lost Boys is gone, except the vampires and possibly California. Keep that in mind.

How much you want to bet this is still in the movie?

lostboys.gif
 
If its really subtitled The Tribe I'd be surprised if it was set in California. Sounds very much like an In Name Only sequel.

That's not always a bad thing , or might have different actor playing the same charracters from 1st as it was years ago and vampires don't age so younger actors.
 
That's not always a bad thing , or might have different actor playing the same charracters from 1st as it was years ago and vampires don't age so younger actors.

Well, my problem with INO sequels is that if they were, you know, good they'd have their own identity instead of trying to leach of my nostalgia for the 80s.
 
Well, my problem with INO sequels is that if they were, you know, good they'd have their own identity instead of trying to leach of my nostalgia for the 80s.

Yeah but the problem is if they were very much like Lost Boys style and used lost boys vampire type things but was just called "The Tribe" then When it came out people wall call it a "a lost boys rip off"


Like Dirty dancing 2 had that not had Dirty dancing 2 (even though I think it was based loosely on a true story) It would of been called a "dirty dancing rip off" and suffered because of it.


But like I said this may not be a name only sequel. Could just be younger actors playing same charracters.
 
Yeah but the problem is if they were very much like Lost Boys style and used lost boys vampire type things but was just called "The Tribe" then When it came out people wall call it a "a lost boys rip off"


Like Dirty dancing 2 had that not had Dirty dancing 2 (even though I think it was based loosely on a true story) It would of been called a "dirty dancing rip off" and suffered because of it.


But like I said this may not be a name only sequel. Could just be younger actors playing same charracters.

See, now if we weren't talking about a Vampire movie I might admit you had a point. Since we are talking about a Vampire movie, a well Hollywood has gone to so many times they stopped getting mud from it decades ago, I have to disagree. Young Vampires are a staple of the Vampire genre. I doubt it would get any comparison to Lost Boys unless it also happened to feature punk inspired gangs and Kieffer Sutherland.
 
See, now if we weren't talking about a Vampire movie I might admit you had a point. Since we are talking about a Vampire movie, a well Hollywood has gone to so many times they stopped getting mud from it decades ago, I have to disagree. Young Vampires are a staple of the Vampire genre. I doubt it would get any comparison to Lost Boys unless it also happened to feature punk inspired gangs and Kieffer Sutherland.


Yeah that's true.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top