JudgeDreddpool
Well-Known Member
![]()
Alien: Romulus won't break established Alien canon
"There was no change for the sake of it."www.digitalspy.com
Common Fede Álvarez W.

![]()
Alien: Romulus won't break established Alien canon
"There was no change for the sake of it."www.digitalspy.com
Common Fede Álvarez W.
ive personally just put this in its own category like star wars visions, as long as nothing explicitly contradicts existing canon i dont see a problem treating it as such but "on paper" its clearly not meant to imply anything greaterThis doesn't actually contradict Aliens because Burke's death was off-screen and they explain what happens afterwards. I suppose it's canon? But it does heavily contradict Aliens: Colonial Marines: Stasis Interrupted so that's problematic.![]()
Aliens: What If...
Aliens: What If... is a five-issue comic book series that was published by Marvel Comics. It was written by Paul Reiser, Leon Reiser, Adam F. Goldberg, Brian Volk-Weiss, and Hans Rodionoff, illustrated by Guiu Vilanova, colored by Yen Nitro, lettered by VC's Clayton Cowles, and edited by Sarah...avp.fandom.com
Maybe it's Like "what if we show this thing" ahahahah.The thing is it explains how Ripley ended up on Fury in Alien³ though. It's showing another perspective on events that are supposedly diverged. It's not very good at being divergent basically.
ah i see, i actually was waiting for the 5 issues to all be out before i read them all, just looking at the wiki i found this:The thing is it explains how Ripley ended up on Fury in Alien³ though. It's showing another perspective on events that are supposedly diverged. It's not very good at being divergent basically.
what comic is this?View attachment 2256
He says he's a Replicant. The Android says he's a replicant, on a planet that originated from a Blade Runner spin-off. Blade Runner references, holy crap. If it wasn't for the fact that Arcadia 234 is apparently completely destroyed, this would be probably the most sufficient proof of a connection.
Tbh there are some ruins in the comic. Or maybe i saw wrong.
exactly, the predator 2018 is my biggest issue with the overall timeline flow and everything looking at least somewhat congruousThe time difference between The Predator (2018) and Blade Runner (2019) reminds me of Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1-3 (reboot) taking place a few years before Black Ops 2 in the same universe. There's also a Blade Runner comic set in 2009 showing off-world colonies in 2007. That's a tough thing to reconcile with the Weyland timeline.
To me, I have had this idea that Blade Runner is what 2122 looks like in the Alien series based on the existing statements. Merging them actually retcons quite a bit of lore. Like, the Moon and Mars being colonised in the 1990s if we follow the role-playing game. I'm certain that this comic didn't make those connections by accident though. To be honest, I can reconcile The Predator timeline in my head as long as it doesn't show an existing megacity like Los Angeles looking like our modern day version of it. It'd make me pull my hair out trying to make sense of it all.exactly, the predator 2018 is my biggest issue with the overall timeline flow and everything looking at least somewhat congruous
If I included novels then I'd include basically as many as I possibly could... which includes adaptations of the comics... they only explain that Ripley in Aliens vol. 3 is an android in the novel version which sucks because if you read the canon version of the story you'd have no idea how Ripley is alive in the 2190s. That's a ton of stuff that I'd rather worry about after the comics at least.Oh yeah, BTW @Pro Bot, you planning to include any of the novels in the timeline, cause if so, I can get a list of ones that are canon. Not sure if you'd also want any that are novelizations of the movies or whatnot, but if so, lemme know.