Pro Bot
Well-Known Member
I'll go back and write it down for you later if that helps.
Aa far as Eric helping (re)build Cerebro, we see this happen in Dark Phoenix. Surely something similar could have happened in the original timeline, after the Beast-built version was damaged.Yes, the Emma stuff is just a weird thing but it isn't a continuity error. The other things are continuity errors that fans will create headcanons to fix them. Obviously the backstory of Xavier in the original trilogy was written very differently than what we got in First Class and DoFP. And DoFP is obviously in the same timeline as First Class, because it is a sequel to that film.
If we are to put them in the same timeline we have to admit that it is a retcon, there is no other official explanation. We have to ignore that Xavier says that he met Eric at 17 and that he helped him build Cerebro. Those things got retconned (if they are on the same timeline). I personally don't like that, so I separate First Class from the early films' timeline, but it is not official, like those explanations of the continuity errors.
(Another thing, Jean Grey's age is also different in the new films. She was born in 1967 according to Dark Phoenix, but in TLS she looks very young for a 19-year-old. Logan couldn't possibly change her birthday by traveling to 1973, so it is either a continuity error or an actress that looks younger than what she is supposed to look, like Charles in Dark Phoenix).



Comic Book Adaptation Timeline
1944
????
X-Men Movie Adaptation #1 (pg. 1)
X-Men: The Movie Prequel: Magneto #1 (pg. 1-5)
1979
March
X-Men Movie Adaptation #1 (pg. 17-18)
1988
????
X-Men Movie Adaptation #1 (pg. 1-2)
1992
????
X-Men: The Movie Prequel: Magneto #1 (pg. 14-23)
1994
????
X-Men: The Movie Prequel: Magneto #1 (pg. 24-43)
1999
????
X-Men Movie Adaptation #1 (pg. 2)
2000
????
X-Men: The Movie Prequel: Magneto #1 (pg. 6-10)
X-Men: The Movie Prequel: Rogue #1 (pg. 6-7)
X-Men: The Movie Prequel: Rogue #1 (pg. 1-6, 8-19)
X-Men: The Movie Prequel: Magneto #1 (pg. 11-13, 44-46)
X-Men: The Movie Prequel: Rogue #1 (pg. 20-46)
X-Men: The Movie Prequel: Wolverine #1 (pg. 1-46)
X-Men Movie Adaptation #1 (pg. 3-5)
X-Men: The Movie Prequel: Wolverine #1 (pg. 46-47)
X-Men: The Movie Prequel: Rogue #1 (pg. 47)
X-Men Movie Adaptation #1 (pg. 6-47)
2006
????
X-Men: The Movie Special #1, "Call to Arms"
Maybe it's small Wolverine's universe. (I'm kidding, he was definitely a bit smaller than 5.3 in D&W, but... just a fun thought.)
View attachment 2475
View attachment 2476
Logan is like Mario. Gets hit too much and loses a foot in height.Yeah, it's not really a problem at all. Just wanted to note it.
Yeah and Homecoming is "8 years later" from Avengers... lol. Things can change.It's set 20 years before 2006, therefore 1986. She's just a really young looking 19 year old for me.
Based if so. But is the GBA version of the Official Game with Laura compatible?Compatible with the Wolverine Origins game?

Wouldn't Generation X make more sense to include, since it uses the X-Mansion that was later used in the film series and, well, actually has the X-Men license?I know it's not connected to anything but for the sake of completion of all X-Men Live Action properties do you want Mutant X here? I have it for y'all if you do...![]()
Yes, Generation X would make more sense to include. Mutant X tries and succeeds at not referencing ANYTHING X-Men licensed other than the rough concept of Mutants (and New Mutants). But the show was official and had official Marvel Comic Book tie-ins.Wouldn't Generation X make more sense to include, since it uses the X-Mansion that was later used in the film series and, well, actually has the X-Men license?
Anything pre-Blade or Hasslehoff Nick Fury 1998 ain't going here.Yes, Generation X would make more sense to include. Mutant X tries and succeeds at not referencing ANYTHING X-Men licensed other than the rough concept of Mutants (and New Mutants). But the show was official and had official Marvel Comic Book tie-ins.
If you are considering the X-Men timelines/universes as a tree I would say Mutant X would fit in somewhere near a rotted-out branch but still fits lol. I really don't mind if you do not want to include it here as it doesn't fully have a spot here and I get that 100% (especially after rewatching it these past weeks...ugh). I would likely post it as its own individual thread if nothing comes of it here.![]()
In case you're wondering, the Mutant X TV series takes place on Earth-704509, per Official Handbook of the Marvel Universe A to Z #5If you are considering the X-Men timelines/universes as a tree I would say Mutant X would fit in somewhere near a rotted-out branch but still fits lol. I really don't mind if you do not want to include it here as it doesn't fully have a spot here and I get that 100% (especially after rewatching it these past weeks...ugh). I would likely post it as its own individual thread if nothing comes of it here.![]()
And Mutant X doesn't count. It's in the "Marvel-but-not-really" bin with Men in Black / Millarverse / Powers / Night Man / Solar Man and those short film VHS tapes of Malibu sh*t.Anything pre-Blade or Hasslehoff Nick Fury 1998 ain't going here.
Yeah, although they do wipe through a couple of alt timelines which are referenced as different universes and the comic origin shouldn't be in 704509 (Database Issue) since it directly contradicts the show.In case you're wondering, the Mutant X TV series takes place on Earth-704509, per Official Handbook of the Marvel Universe A to Z #5
Anything pre-Blade or Hasslehoff Nick Fury 1998 ain't going here.
Yeah you and I are in agreement that a couple of properties after Blade/Hasselhoff are still a no-go (like Man-Thing etc) and the same thing with any imprint shows.And Mutant X doesn't count. It's in the "Marvel-but-not-really" bin with Men in Black / Millarverse / Powers / Night Man / Solar Man and those short film VHS tapes of Malibu sh*t.
In other words, not MCU adjacent.