Transformers Cinematic Universe - Timeline

I'm not getting in this argument. Chill.
Proceeds to post two videos in order to continue arguing

What are you starting this argument for? Here's how that'll go:

I'd get Caple's quote where he, unprompted, states that Rise of the Beasts preserves the events of Transformers (2007).

You'll bring up a quote where he says it's a reboot, then I'll bring up that he goes on to explain that it is connected and is more of a soft-reboot.

You'll bring up Bumblebee coming to Earth from Cybertron instead of being there since WW2, then I'll bring up that Ironhide (or someone else) was on Earth before 2007 in The Last Knight despite coming to Earth for what seemed to be the first time in said 2007 movie.

It will be the Unicron argument next, so I'll bring up that he's from the future in Rise of the Beasts, meaning Unicron is either from after The Last Knight or from an alternate timeline.

I'd bring up all of Di Bonaventura's quotes, of which there are many, then you'll say that his opinion doesn't matter (?).

I'd show Knight saying that he wanted Megatron to be in Bumblebee but realised he's frozen on Earth due to the 2007 movie and didn't do it because of the continuity.

I'll then mention all the connections. Sector 7, Seymour Simmons, the licence plate in Bumblebee matching Transformers (2007) exactly, the motion comic having Megatron frozen in ice, the second short video on the Bumblebee blu-ray featuring John Cena referencing NBE-1 (Megatron's designation in 2007), and that new comic using the IDW movie timeline designation and showing Cliffjumper being saved during Bumblebee.



Why not, instead, we just settle it. You have your timeline, I have mine. I'll help you with placements, you can help me with placements, we treat each other with some respect. Right?
 
I got a better thread than this one.

I wouldn't say the best. I'd say different.
 
Proceeds to post two videos in order to continue arguing

What are you starting this argument for? Here's how that'll go:

I'd get Caple's quote where he, unprompted, states that Rise of the Beasts preserves the events of Transformers (2007).

You'll bring up a quote where he says it's a reboot, then I'll bring up that he goes on to explain that it is connected and is more of a soft-reboot.

You'll bring up Bumblebee coming to Earth from Cybertron instead of being there since WW2, then I'll bring up that Ironhide (or someone else) was on Earth before 2007 in The Last Knight despite coming to Earth for what seemed to be the first time in said 2007 movie.

It will be the Unicron argument next, so I'll bring up that he's from the future in Rise of the Beasts, meaning Unicron is either from after The Last Knight or from an alternate timeline.

I'd bring up all of Di Bonaventura's quotes, of which there are many, then you'll say that his opinion doesn't matter (?).

I'd show Knight saying that he wanted Megatron to be in Bumblebee but realised he's frozen on Earth due to the 2007 movie and didn't do it because of the continuity.

I'll then mention all the connections. Sector 7, Seymour Simmons, the licence plate in Bumblebee matching Transformers (2007) exactly, the motion comic having Megatron frozen in ice, the second short video on the Bumblebee blu-ray featuring John Cena referencing NBE-1 (Megatron's designation in 2007), and that new comic using the IDW movie timeline designation and showing Cliffjumper being saved during Bumblebee.



Why not, instead, we just settle it. You have your timeline, I have mine. I'll help you with placements, you can help me with placements, we treat each other with some respect. Right?
Just posting videos relevant to the conversation, was curious to what your thoughts were on Comodin Cam's analysis of it.

Calm down, please.
 
You instigate an argument, agree to stop the argument, bring it up after it's done and finished, and now you're acting all innocent?

Also, please stop doing this. You're being condescending on purpose, and you don't even know how calm or not I am to begin with.

Now I'm going to go update the comics a bit, so feel free to copy it onto the second posted thread.
 
You instigate an argument, agree to stop the argument, bring it up after it's done and finished, and now you're acting all innocent?

Also, please stop doing this. You're being condescending on purpose, and you don't even know how calm or not I am to begin with.

Now I'm going to go update the comics a bit, so feel free to copy it onto the second posted thread.
Dude you're legitimately worrying me, I'm not even joking...
Nothing I said was done to instigate anything nor to spite. I'm sorry you took it that way but you are coming across as a bit paranoid....
 
Dude you're legitimately worrying me, I'm not even joking...
Nothing I said was done to instigate anything nor to spite. I'm sorry you took it that way but you are coming across as a bit paranoid....
No you're not, you're just pretending you don't know what you're doing. Stop instigating fights on this website. Stop pretending to be a vulnerable victim whenever someone calls you out for it.


Woe you, Megatron commented on my thread instead of yours. Who actually cares, though? Saying "my timeline is better than yours" is very narcissistic and rude, especially when you created yours out of spite.

You even lied to yourself once and claimed I created it after your Transformers timeline because you were upset people disagreed with your DCU timeline and thought they'd create their own one because of it. You got upset over an imaginary situation, falsely accused me of creating a second Transformers timeline and then justified you doing what you accused me of because mine is completely wrong according to you (well, Wikipedia sources agree with me and they use direct quotes from producers and directors).

It's obvious to everyone that you only posted your timeline on this one out of a need for validation.
 
Trolling is not humour. It is a deliberate attempt to provoke someone for your own amusement. Thank you for admiting it though.
 
Trolling is not humour. It is a deliberate attempt to provoke someone for your own amusement. Thank you for admiting it though.
I noticed how you removed the comment where you said that your humour is troll humour and that you don't care. This was a direct response to that comment. The fact you deleted it means you knew that it was wrong to admit that you were trolling me.

Reported you btw. You're legitimately being a douchebag.
Good, report this comment too. Maybe there's a way they can check deleted comments.
 
I noticed how you removed the comment where you said that your humour is troll humour and that you don't care. This was a direct response to that comment. The fact you deleted it means you know that it was wrong to admit that you were trolling on purpose.


Good, report this comment too. Maybe there's a way they can check deleted comments.
Let me put a cap on this:
1.) Troll humor is something I do with friends. Good friends I know personally, we love it and don't take it personally. You did. That was my mistake for the context being lost there. However:
2.) I deleted my apology post only because I saw your response posted immediately after that. Felt that apologizing to someone who is going keep taking that a few words done in jest as a personal threat is not worth apologizing to.

I'm trying to be a better person. I'm trying to avoid discourse. And here you are playing the victim man. I'm not even saying you're wrong for not trusting me, I'm rattled by how you are taking this so wrong and now I'm at the point where it doesn't matter what I say: you'll police me and judging my character from what "Here's a better thread" - "my thread has none of this stuff btw". I'm referencing the past...mocking myself. But I guess that wasn't clear enough.

And that's why I deleted my apology and I reported you. You are being an asshole in spite of me trying to be chill and not stir up anything.
That's not on me in this case.
 
Let me put a cap on this:
1.) Troll humor is something I do with friends. Good friends I know personally, we love it and don't take it personally. You did. That was my mistake for the context being lost there. However:
2.) I deleted my apology post only because I saw your response posted immediately after that. Felt that apologizing to someone who is going keep taking that a few words done in jest as a personal threat is not worth apologizing to.

I'm trying to be a better person. I'm trying to avoid discourse. And here you are playing the victim man. I'm not even saying you're wrong for not trusting me, I'm rattled by how you are taking this so wrong and now I'm at the point where it doesn't matter what I say: you'll police me and judging my character from what "Here's a better thread" - "my thread has none of this stuff btw". I'm referencing the past...mocking myself. But I guess that wasn't clear enough.

And that's why I deleted my apology and I reported you. You are being an asshole in spite of me trying to be chill and not stir up anything.
That's not on me in this case.
mate... you started the discourse. This is... idk. I'm not even part of the argument but... man.
 
And you are reminding me of some really abusive, gaslighting people I've had in my life man. That's the final straw.

You're remaining on my block list. Period. My heart can't handle this shit. You are worse than a ghoul, you're triggering.
 
And you are reminding me of some really abusive, gaslighting people I've had in my life man. That's the final straw.

You're remaining on my block list. Period. My heart can't handle this shit. You are worse than a ghoul, you're triggering.
is that reply to me? If so, I'm confused
 

Latest posts

Back
Top