X-Men Cinematic Universe - Timeline (Revised & Original)

Also New Mutants literally takes place within a day or so after the woman who adopts X-23 snuck in and took footage of the experiments, the same footage is reused from Logan.
Apparently this and Deadpool & Wolverine's evidence about Logan literally being the inevitable future of "Earth-10005" (in the film's words, but it's clearly not that numbering anymore) wasn't enough for the Marvel Database wiki.

That literally got ignored because of admin bias.
 
Sorry, the 25 years were incorrectly mentioned; it's stated in Logan that Xavier's seizures killed most of the X-Men
Now I will say I'm curious how Avengers: Doomsday might acknowledge that seizure incident and if anything changed as a result of Monica arriving there.
 
Earth-TRN1141
X-Men: the Movie Special #1

Earth-TRN1286
X-Men: The Movie Prequel: Wolverine #1
X-Men: The Movie Prequel: Rogue #1
X-Men: The Movie Prequel: Magneto #1
X-Men: The Movie #1
X-Men 2 #1
 
Non-canon X-Men tie-ins timeline when? I could do it.
You already have:

Comic Book Adaptation Timeline
1944

????

X-Men Movie Adaptation #1 (pg. 1)
X-Men: The Movie Prequel: Magneto #1 (pg. 1-5)


1979
March
X-Men Movie Adaptation #1 (pg. 17-18)

1988
????

X-Men Movie Adaptation #1 (pg. 1-2)

1992
????

X-Men: The Movie Prequel: Magneto #1 (pg. 14-23)

1994
????

X-Men: The Movie Prequel: Magneto #1 (pg. 24-43)

1999
????

X-Men Movie Adaptation #1 (pg. 2)

2000
????
X-Men: The Movie Prequel: Magneto #1 (pg. 6-10)
X-Men: The Movie Prequel: Rogue #1 (pg. 6-7)
X-Men: The Movie Prequel: Rogue #1 (pg. 1-6, 8-19)
X-Men: The Movie Prequel: Magneto #1 (pg. 11-13, 44-46)
X-Men: The Movie Prequel: Rogue #1 (pg. 20-46)
X-Men: The Movie Prequel: Wolverine #1 (pg. 1-46)
X-Men Movie Adaptation #1 (pg. 3-5)
X-Men: The Movie Prequel: Wolverine #1 (pg. 46-47)
X-Men: The Movie Prequel: Rogue #1 (pg. 47)
X-Men Movie Adaptation #1 (pg. 6-47)


2006
????
X-Men: The Movie Special #1, "Call to Arms"

Maybe it's small Wolverine's universe. (I'm kidding, he was definitely a bit smaller than 5.3 in D&W, but... just a fun thought.)
 
What about The Wolverine's mid-credits scene that leads into DOFP?
Does it even though? All it shows is charles and erik telling logan theres a bigger threat coming. They could've easily just dealt with that off-screen between movies without time travel.

Also, it shows an advert on tv for trask industries' robotic limbs, as if they hadn't went public yet about their true intentions. Yet in 25 moments we learn that by 2015 the war between mutants and sentinels had already well and truly begun. So none of it really makes sense unless you just say it's 2 separate timelines. Logan is a direct sequel to the original timeline movies and dofp is a direct sequel to First Class, with nothing but 25 moments and maybe some similar events to the original timeline movies in between.
 
Does it even though? All it shows is charles and erik telling logan theres a bigger threat coming. They could've easily just dealt with that off-screen between movies without time travel.

Also, it shows an advert on tv for trask industries' robotic limbs, as if they hadn't went public yet about their true intentions. Yet in 25 moments we learn that by 2015 the war between mutants and sentinels had already well and truly begun. So none of it really makes sense unless you just say it's 2 separate timelines. Logan is a direct sequel to the original timeline movies and dofp is a direct sequel to First Class, with nothing but 25 moments and maybe some similar events to the original timeline movies in between.
Regardless of whether things seem to not align (even though you're still making up ways to explain other plotholes if it helps your case) the intention by the creators of the FoX-Men meant for Logan to be post-DoFP, no matter how inconsistent it may be. That'd be like saying Doctor Who season 1 isn't canon because it implies Susan came up with the name Tardis, or that Army of Darkness isn't canon because it retcons Evil Dead 2 - the Rule of God always takes precedence (unless numerous people working on something disagree, since Rule of God wouldn't be able to apply in the first place)
 
According to what exactly?
The film? New Mutants?

When one of them is peering into the doctor lady's mind (I forget names, I don't forget events) you see the same footage from Logan, of the kids walking down the hospital halls to their doom, you can assume that she saw and whatever the former employee saw were moments apart from each other.

LITERALLY a "small world" coincidence lol.
 
Last edited:
The film? New Mutants?

When one of them is peering into the doctor lady's mind (I forget names, I don't forget events) you see the same footage from Logan, of the kids walking down the hospital halls to their doom, you can assume that she saw and whatever the former employee saw were moments apart from each other.

LITERALLY a "small world" coincidence lol.
I have a lot of issues with that. For one, Dani was meant to be seeing a vision of where they would be heading afterwards, why would they be headed to the Transigen research facility? That place was for the x-23 and 24 project. Also I don't see how Dr. Reyes would've been able to see that footage, it was filmed in secret by nurse Gabrielle on her phone. If Dr. Reyes somehow got hold of that footage then surely she would've had nurse Gabrielle fired.

Dr. Reyes had also seemingly been working at the New Mutants facility for at-least a few years, don't see why she would just take a quick trip down to Mexico. Then theres also the fact that all the new mutants would then have to be born after 2004.

The way I view it is the same way I view the fact that they showed 10005 wolverine flashbacks when probing 'worst Wolverine's' mind in dp&w. What we see on screen is just not what the actual characters were seeing. It was obviously just a cost saving measure to use the footage from Logan in NM and I don't think you should really pay much attention to it.
 
I have a lot of issues with that. For one, Dani was meant to be seeing a vision of where they would be heading afterwards, why would they be headed to the Transigen research facility? That place was for the x-23 and 24 project. Also I don't see how Dr. Reyes would've been able to see that footage, it was filmed in secret by nurse Gabrielle on her phone. If Dr. Reyes somehow got hold of that footage then surely she would've had nurse Gabrielle fired.

Dr. Reyes had also seemingly been working at the New Mutants facility for at-least a few years, don't see why she would just take a quick trip down to Mexico. Then theres also the fact that all the new mutants would then have to be born after 2004.

The way I view it is the same way I view the fact that they showed 10005 wolverine flashbacks when probing 'worst Wolverine's' mind in dp&w. What we see on screen is just not what the actual characters were seeing. It was obviously just a cost saving measure to use the footage from Logan in NM and I don't think you should really pay much attention to it.
Naw. The Logan connection was definitely intentional.

In regards to the "No new mutants born after 2004", I mean, as an estimate yeah. There would be 1% of leftovers in the next generation; possibly why the New Mutants were so special to begin with.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top