Alien vs. Predator - Timeline

i personally have gone back and forth in the past but for about the past year or so (specifically right after the release of romulus) ive been pretty much firmly in the camp of "alien/predator/blade runner is one continuity" and any connections to other franchises can be debated upon whats actual proper canon or just fan-service/easter eggs
Hm, so you're like me then. I think at this point we'd need a direct statement on it. It's kinda funny that both Alien: Earth and Predator: Badlands' directors implied they support it.

I don't know enough about either franchises to know about many inconsistencies (literally all I know about Blade Runner is there's blades and they run :p) but I'm always game for more content in anything (unless it's bad content - connected to anything or not)
Funnily enough, there's not really any blades and they don't always run. Blade Runner is good content though, very different to Predator but really interesting. I actually think both Blade Runner films are in my top favourite films of all time, along with Alien and Batman Returns.
 
Just looking at where I could watch the Blade Runner movies/shows, and is Soldier the 1998 movie?
 
Just looking at where I could watch the Blade Runner movies/shows, and is Soldier the 1998 movie?
Depends where you live for the movies. I don't really endorse it if you can watch it legally, but pirated versions of Blade Runner usually use The Final Cut. it might be hard to find Black Lotus in English. I actually brought myself an unofficial blu-ray of it just so I could watch that version. It's on CrunchyRoll in the non-canon Japanese language with subtitles.

Yes, Soldier is the one from 1998.
 
Depends where you live for the movies. I don't really endorse it if you can watch it legally, but pirated versions of Blade Runner usually use The Final Cut. it might be hard to find Black Lotus in English. I actually brought myself an unofficial blu-ray of it just so I could watch that version. It's on CrunchyRoll in the non-canon Japanese language with subtitles.

Yes, Soldier is the one from 1998.
Black Lotus is on Channel 4 (if google's correct), and thanks for the Soldier information (which the movie seems to be scarcer than the original Hellraiser - which is surprisingly hard to find online, even illegally)
 
Hm, so you're like me then. I think at this point we'd need a direct statement on it. It's kinda funny that both Alien: Earth and Predator: Badlands' directors implied they support it.
yea exactly, the inclusion of a w-y android in badlands really shut the door on the question of "is avp even one canon franchise?" and like you said, rights are really the only thing keeping blade runner not directly connected as well

It'd be cool if the Tyrell Corporation resurfaces in that series, explaining how Dallas was working for a seemingly defunct company prior to Alien.
yess i was really hoping one of the rival companies would be tyrell, especially considering the stuff on the prometheus bluray, but those damn licensing issues haha
 
The original cut of The Predator was supposed to have to "friendly" predators that had been guests of the military for awhile. I think they were in hiding from the Assassin Predator. There was an image released of them in a tank wearing army gear with the humans from the movie. Sadly that was all cut for the 3rd act we got in the woods and on the ship. NECA did make the two Emissary predators as figures though.
Honestly, I really hate that what potential The Predator could've had got squandered over the whole "aUTIsm iS tHe NeXt sTEp iN HUmAn eVOLutIoN" bullshit, not to mention that whole DNA harvesting shit that they tried to retcon into the Predator lore (headcanon-wise, it's only a clan of Bad Bloods doing so, and no-one else).
So, Blade Runner. Official statements. Let's see.

For:
-Ridley Scott
-Dan Trachtenberg
-Noah Hawley
-Charles de Lauzirika
-[Creators of Aliens: What If...? comic]
Note: Dan said they can't truly be connected due to rights issues, Noah used language implying they could be connected, Charles wrote the Weyland Files but downplayed their canon significance in regards to Blade Runner, and the Aliens: What If...? creatives can't decide whether they're a canon story or not (I say yes).

Against:
Steve Asbell
Note: According to Dan, Steve thinks differently to him about Blade Runner. Steve is the head of 20th Century Studios.

I'm actually curious, who supports and who is against the Blade Runner connections here on TheComicBoard? It's an inescapable conversation within the Alien franchise, so naturally I'm just curious. I can never make my mind up on whether I like it, I hate it, I'm indifferent, etc. Does it benefit them both or just create minor but unnecessary inconsistencies?
I mean...
1755453389375.png
 
Depends where you live for the movies. I don't really endorse it if you can watch it legally, but pirated versions of Blade Runner usually use The Final Cut. it might be hard to find Black Lotus in English. I actually brought myself an unofficial blu-ray of it just so I could watch that version. It's on CrunchyRoll in the non-canon Japanese language with subtitles.

Yes, Soldier is the one from 1998.
I know a site that has the English dub for Black Lotus, if anyone's looking for it. Will DM.
 
Let's just say they are the same universe, replicants are either extinct or integrated into society by, we'll say, the events of Alien: Earth. Heck, Jonsey could be a replicant cat for all we know since apparently a lot of animals were wiped out. Maybe the dog in The Predator could be a replicant too, since Ray McCoy had to keep insisting his (unfortunately unsaveable) dog was real in the Blade Runner game.

In Aliens: What If...?, Burke told Cygnus his kind are illegal now, and he's apparently a replicant. It's possible that he meant the combat models, but it does suggest that replicants are probably mostly gone at that point.
 
If Independence Day was made canon, you could say that the initiative at the start of Soldier with them taking babies away in 1996 was a consequence of the Harvester attack. They wanted warriors in case they returned. It also explains the fast tracked technological expansion of the planet.
 
So, Blade Runner. Official statements. Let's see.

For:
-Ridley Scott
-Dan Trachtenberg
-Noah Hawley
-Charles de Lauzirika
-[Creators of Aliens: What If...? comic]
Note: Dan said they can't truly be connected due to rights issues, Noah used language implying they could be connected, Charles wrote the Weyland Files but downplayed their canon significance in regards to Blade Runner, and the Aliens: What If...? creatives can't decide whether they're a canon story or not (I say yes).

Against:
Steve Asbell
Note: According to Dan, Steve thinks differently to him about Blade Runner. Steve is the head of 20th Century Studios.

I'm actually curious, who supports and who is against the Blade Runner connections here on TheComicBoard? It's an inescapable conversation within the Alien franchise, so naturally I'm just curious. I can never make my mind up on whether I like it, I hate it, I'm indifferent, etc. Does it benefit them both or just create minor but unnecessary inconsistencies?
well I'm doing an headcanon timeline, so yeah. I'm pro all in one continuity (speaking of Alien/Predator/Blade Runner/Underwater ofc).
 
If Independence Day was made canon, you could say that the initiative at the start of Soldier with them taking babies away in 1996 was a consequence of the Harvester attack. They wanted warriors in case they returned. It also explains the fast tracked technological expansion of the planet.
Indipendence Day is the closest one to be canon actually.
 
If I can leave an opinion since this timeline has been changed a lot, I'd have in the main timeline just Alien, Predator, Alien vs. Predator crossovers, Underwater and Blade Runner, as with so many times Scott referenced it, can we truly ignore it?

As for the crossover I think they're better in the additional realities. And better be added with all the rest in the headcanon one.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top