Korinthian said:
I'd like to see a new cool character as well, I really do, but let's face it: most things have been done. Also, improving an existing 616 character will arguable make a better finished product as well as give some fan-service to the few comic book nerds among us :-b
That's what I'm saying. I'm fine with MU guys being ultimitized if they attempt to improve and maximize on the original character's concept, but not when they use them as scene padding. Then it's a waste. For example, Omega Red, Rhino, Shocker, Venom, Carnage, Gwen Stacy, Vision, Sandman, Lady Deathstrike, Marrow, Mister Sinister, Juggernaut, The Inhumans, and probably some others I can't think of right now. All these characters were either radical departures from their old MU and as such, defied all reason to share the name (not because they were BAD, but because they're just nothing like their originals, not even in concept, generally just appearance), were identical to their originals with virtually no change save "we've not met you before" syndrome, or were just quickly swept under the carpet and not used except as throwaway scenes.
Characters I'm watching should this happen to them: Carol Danvers, Mahr-Vehl, Jen Walters, and Captain Britain. So far, so good, though.
So, I just think that the ultimizations are happening too quickly without too much thought. The ability to take a pre-existing character and 'ultimize' him or her is a one-shot deal and very, VERY finite. When it's done, it should be with the same care and consideration for maximizing potential stories as was given to Spider-Man, the X-Men, and the Ultimates in the first place, and not as an in-joke.
If this is not the case, then they should just invent a new character for their purposes. The reason they don't? It's as you say - it's harder to create something new from scratch than to copy or **** with someone else's work.
At least that's what I think anyway.
