Pro Bot
Well-Known Member
Pfffft... spoilsport.Don't be cringe.
Pfffft... spoilsport.Don't be cringe.
I think DCU tie-in material should not be assumed canon unless explicitly told it is. It seems this is how James Gunn operates and he is basically DCU's Kevin Feige.I bet if you asked Gunn if the comic and novel were canon, he'd say the same thing. He's just like this, we know that.
That dog biscuit comic wasn't important in any way whatsoever to the plot of Superman, too. If Krypto Saves the Day! isn't included on the basis that it has no importance, then that comic shouldn't be either.I think DCU tie-in material should not be assumed canon unless explicitly told it is. It seems this is how James Gunn operates and he is basically DCU's Kevin Feige.
I guess that Superman dog biscuit advertisement comic is non-canon as well.
There's no proof Gunn actually sees "canon" as "important". His beliefs on what counts as canon could just be a lot stricter than mostThat dog biscuit comic wasn't important in any way whatsoever to the plot of Superman, too. If Krypto Saves the Day! isn't included on the basis that it has no importance, then that comic shouldn't be either.
The novel is advertised as an official prequel, whereas Krypto is just Tom and Jerry-esque antics (from what I've gathered from explanations). Though, let's not start this argument up again… it's surprisingly controversialSelfishmisery believes that the novel should be on the timeline because it's more important despite Gunn said no comics or novels are canon, referring to that one directly.
Damn so this confirms it.
Yeah, Gunn did say it isn't canon. Though, I'd say it was made with the intention of being canon, so unless something directly contradicts it, it should be safe to stay on the timelineDamn so this confirms it.
Maybe.There's no proof Gunn actually sees "canon" as "important". His beliefs on what counts as canon could just be a lot stricter than most
Everyone and everything else with the power to confirm/deny its canonicity pretty much confirms it is canon though. Until we have something like an official timeline (like the D+ MCU watch order) I'd say following the stricter rules are usually the more logical way to go.Maybe.
https://www.cbr.com/james-gunn-marvel-differing-views-i-am-groot-mcu-canon/1. I Am Groot sets itself in the MCU.
2. I Am Groot has no contradictions to the MCU.
3. Gunn can't see the series as canon because... I guess we don't know. Probably because it's silly, unimportant shorts. We don't know why.
I would say the same about the comic and animated shorts too, especially since Gunn outright said that the shorts are in the same universe before very explicitly. That implies that it was made to be canon.Yeah, Gunn did say it isn't canon. Though, I'd say it was made with the intention of being canon, so unless something directly contradicts it, it should be safe to stay on the timeline
"I think it's exciting to be able to tell different stories for different groups of people. So, you know, Superman was for everyone. Peacemaker is for an adult audience. Supergirl will be for everyone. We have the Krypto shorts that are for children. Then, we have Clayface, which is an R-rated horror film. So, I really like the idea of telling truly different tales within a singular universe."
I'd say it'd be better for the "Non-DCAU Animated Universes" thread (not sure if it's already been added)Even least them somewhere else, perhaps. That could work... then on a viewing order give them a distinctive canonicity marker.
....what?If the Deathstroke graphic novel based on the unreleased movie's script ever releases (I'm still waiting for it...), could it be DCEU?
There were reports that Joe Manganiello had a script written for his DCEU Deathstroke, and after James Gunn told him to let it and the character go, he had talks to turn it into a graphic novel. All that was a few years ago though....what?
What is that?
Peacemaker Presents technically is one.Yeah, I'd say it'd count. I wouldn't mind DCEU continuation comics.