Marvel Cinematic Universe - Timeline (Part 5)

Slyonic said:
The only timeline indicator is that they've been FF for four years, and Mole Man was the first villain they encountered. Whether that's weeks or months after they got powers is vague.
Click to expand...
from what we see, the FF film droves much from Earth-616, I think we should Adapt Earth-616 in our time to get a more precise point in the timeline. At least for now until the film comes out.
 
selfishmisery said:
Speaking of viewing order, I bracketed the other universes to a mini-section after Loki s2.

Should I put the X-Men films above Deadpool & Wolverine in this section or not?
Click to expand...
What If S03 is now incorrectly listed two times in viewing order. (once after Agatha, once in multiverse section after Loki)
 
selfishmisery said:
I never got legitimate feedback on that. Just "well, 20 years ago is 20 years ago" (in regards to the flashbacks with the mom institutionalized).

Is there any definite proof it's 2020?
Click to expand...
with the wiki even placing helstrom in its own branch, id say at this point feel free to move its placement, i personally have the flashbacks in 2000, with the rest of the series in october 2022
 
selfishmisery said:
FOX's Daredevil and Wesley Snipe's Blade don't matter as much as Spider-Man or X-Men narratively.

They're another tier below "Mandatory Viewing Order" and "Optional Content" - "Not Important".
Click to expand...
Eh, if we put in The New Mutants and Kraven, we should definitely put in Daredevil and Blade.

Either way, I really really appreciate you putting the Multiverse content in the viewing order. It's how I personally consider the MCU to be complete, so it's a great addition.
 
Slyonic said:
Eh, if we put in The New Mutants and Kraven, we should definitely put in Daredevil and Blade.

Either way, I really really appreciate you putting the Multiverse content in the viewing order. It's how I personally consider the MCU to be complete, so it's a great addition.
Click to expand...
Let me contextualize it this way:

The X-Men and Spider-Man films are so deep into MCU lore that they're literally resolving loose ends from those completed universes.

Blade is NOT on the same level because...we would have Blade mentioning he killed this guy and ended all the vampires from his universe offscreen.
That didn't happen. No resolution to this cliffhanger from his TV show, therefore, neither that nor FOX's Daredevil are on the same level as Spider-Man or X-Men.
 
Pro Bot said:
I think that every live-action multiverse crossover is worth including, no matter how big or small.
Click to expand...
"Optional Content" is for stuff that matters in the ongoing narrative like Andrew Garfield's Spider-Man finding resolution for Gwen Stacy's death after saving MCU's MJ. And what Avengers: Doomsday will do for the X-Men universe in it's final swan song.

Blade played by Wesley Snipes and Elektra played by Jennifer Garner are extended gags. Other than Ben Affleck's Daredevil being mentioned as dead offscreen, there's no follow up on that. Those are essentially "Oh hey, I know that guy!". If you know that to get the joke, then you don't need to be required to watch 2 shitty Daredevil films, 3 Blade films and a 12-episode TV series that ends with Icicle Sr basically making an empty threat with no follow up.

I forgot to mention: no Tim Story's Fantastic Four either for the Viewing Order. Chris Evans' Human Torch is another extended gag like Blade and Elektra. Same logic applies, "Hey I know that guy!"
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Back
Top