Captain Canuck
The poster formerly known as captaincanuck65
I just saw it. I'm not finished processing it, but I liked it. I'll post my thoughts later. I want to hear yours.
Discuss away!
Discuss away!
This article sums it up better than I could.
I would have liked to have seen R2 a bit more too (and him randomly waking up at the end needed more of an explanation)
And Rey is obviously Luke's daughter, right?
Didn't need the spoiler tags?
If i had to rate the film in terms of SW I go V - IV - III - II - VI - VII - I , so not the worst SW movie as phantom menace is worse (though it had better characters overall) but not that good in terms of SW
You like return of the Jedi less than episodes 2 and 3?
I didn't like that either but JJ Abrams explained it as BB-8 woke him up saying he has a piece of the map and asking of R2 had the rest of it. he expanded on that as saying R2 just took a while to "wake up" - it's a little awkward but that's what it is.
I'm 50/50 on this. On one hand it's too obvious and a Jedi would not form the type of relationship that would be required to have children. On the other hand her storyline mirrors Luke's and Kathleen Kennedy has said that the new movies will continue the Skywalker story, so assuming she means it will mostly focus on that story maybe she is (along with her cousin Ben).
I'm getting tired of the recycled "Mary Sue" comments regarding Rey.
First, her Force Powers didn't come out of left field like people keep saying. It hasn't been revealed yet, but it's pretty likely she's the daughter of Luke Skywalker. As a Skywalker, she's incredibly powerful in the Force.
It's also INCREDIBLY likely she had a fair amount of training in Jedi/Force abilities as a child, assuming she's Luke's daughter.
I'm getting tired of the recycled "Mary Sue" comments regarding Rey.
First, her Force Powers didn't come out of left field like people keep saying. It hasn't been revealed yet, but it's pretty likely she's the daughter of Luke Skywalker. As a Skywalker, she's incredibly powerful in the Force.
It's also INCREDIBLY likely she had a fair amount of training in Jedi/Force abilities as a child, assuming she's Luke's daughter.
I think when Ben Solo/Kylo Ren turned and slaughtered the Jedi training at Luke's academy, Luke spirited Rey away to a remote desert planet (like Tatooine) and wiped her memory of her Force abilities and identity, as a way of hiding her from Ren and the First Order.
Her Skywalker piloting and tech-head/mechanic skills, her direct link to Luke's old lightsaber (and Anakin's before him), the knowing glances Han and Leia gave her, etc.
I'm of the opinion her abilities/powers sort of subconsciously came back to her as a result of Ren's delving into her mind.
Point is the lightsaber and Force skills she had didn't just come out of nowhere or serve to paint her as a "Mary Sue" (the battlecry of angry men everywhere it seems in relation to this movie). She's a Skywalker. Not to oversimplify, but that kind of says it all.
Anakin was the Chosen One and failed. Luke was a partial path to redemption for the Skywalker line, and Rey will serve as a focal point to balance the Force (just as her father and grandfather did in different ways).
While the Jedi of the Old Republic didn't form relationships, I think Luke may either ignore that or just be ignorant about it. He may also decide to change that rule.
I'm getting tired of the recycled "Mary Sue" comments regarding Rey.
First, her Force Powers didn't come out of left field like people keep saying. It hasn't been revealed yet, but it's pretty likely she's the daughter of Luke Skywalker. As a Skywalker, she's incredibly powerful in the Force.
It's also INCREDIBLY likely she had a fair amount of training in Jedi/Force abilities as a child, assuming she's Luke's daughter.
I think when Ben Solo/Kylo Ren turned and slaughtered the Jedi training at Luke's academy, Luke spirited Rey away to a remote desert planet (like Tatooine) and wiped her memory of her Force abilities and identity, as a way of hiding her from Ren and the First Order.
Her Skywalker piloting and tech-head/mechanic skills, her direct link to Luke's old lightsaber (and Anakin's before him), the knowing glances Han and Leia gave her, etc.
I'm of the opinion her abilities/powers sort of subconsciously came back to her as a result of Ren's delving into her mind.
Point is the lightsaber and Force skills she had didn't just come out of nowhere or serve to paint her as a "Mary Sue" (the battlecry of angry men everywhere it seems in relation to this movie). She's a Skywalker. Not to oversimplify, but that kind of says it all.
Anakin was the Chosen One and failed. Luke was a partial path to redemption for the Skywalker line, and Rey will serve as a focal point to balance the Force (just as her father and grandfather did in different ways)..
There is a reason people say superman is too perfect or complain at some batman plans.
Because they've never read a comic.
Or because before new 52 superman was too perfect. He had no flaws and that makes a lousy character.
It has nothing to do with "the battlecry of angry men" As that is a really easy and convenient argument "Don't like her you are sexist!" even though some of the same people like myself complained they've erased mara jade BUT as there's more females erased from the EU i guess everyone in support of loosing mara jade or Jaina Solo are just "angry men"
No. it's storytelling 101 , the excuse of "They'll explain it in a sequel" does not cut it. Regardless of gender having a character out pilot Han solo , Tell him things about the Falcon he didnt know , out shoot a wave of military trained guys , then out dual someone who had training all the while having NO flaws is terrible
There is a reason people say superman is too perfect or complain at some batman plans. It because gender does not = character. The fact your argument comes down to "if you dont like her your sexist" and "It's ok they'll explain it" means I suspect you kind of already know it's true. I mean "It's also INCREDIBLY likely she had a fair amount of training in Jedi/Force abilities as a child, assuming she's Luke's daughter." But spent the movie saying jedi + luke are just myths, meaning theres no proof she had training.
as for "She's a skywalker" Oh you mean like anakin who first fight with someone trained (dooku) he lost?
Or luke who in movie VI never fought any one and movie V could barly use the force till trained?
She is a bad character the same way Superman usually is.
I agree with all of this: Rey is basically the Jedi equivalent of Jason Bourne. And I wouldn't be surprised if Max von Sydow was watching over her before his untimely demise (hence his knowledge of Kylo Ren and Leia and possessing part of the map to Luke's whereabouts).
Based on the novelization, I am now more than ever convinced that Snoke is actually Darth Plagueis and that he is the one responsible for the creation of Anakin Skywalker.
Here's the thing: no one would would be complaining if Ben Solo had been the one out piloting Han Solo, or being a better tech head or lightsaber dueler, etc.
I think it's inherently untrue to say Rey was a character without flaws. I also think it's inherently ridiculous to complain that some stuff hasn't been accomplished yet in the first part of a film trilogy. Their character arcs are meant to cover the trilogy. Her arc in this film was partially discovering her origins, though admittedly not getting the full explanation. Just like Luke ANH & ESB, and Anakin in the Prequels.
Luke was a pilot great enough to blow up the frigging Death Star a few days after leaving his planet.
Anakin was the first human to win a pod race (in a self built pod racer) and blew up a Trade Federation command ship as a 10 year old kid.
Yet no mentions of Luke or Anakin being overpowered by those same Rey detractors, so yeah, there does seem to be some odd double standard at play.
Kind of a valid point, no?
No, there isn't, except her flashbacks strongly indicating her witnessing Ben Solo/Kylo Ren's turn and slaughter of the other trainees at Luke's school, and the Force abilities she exhibited.
I mean, come ON! Those are the biggest indicators right there! Her parallel childhoods to Anakin and Luke growing up on desolate desert worlds, etc. I mean, we don't know for sure, that's true, but the formula indicates the revelation about Luke being her father will come in the next film, just as Empire did the revelation of Luke/Vader's father & son relationship.
We'll also get the chance to see Luke explain the turn of Ben Solo and why he left Rey on Jakku, why and how he wiped her memory to protect her, etc. It could even be revealed that Luke wiped Ben's memory of Rey to prevent him from hunting her directly.
Yes, Dooku the Sith Lord and master lightsaber dueler. I doubt Kylo Ren is anything close to Dooku at full health (least not yet), let alone with a bowcaster blast through his side. It's amazing how in the rush to label Rey as overpowered/Mary Sue, many ignore that, and the obvious indicators of her lineage. I mean... why do that? There's an inherent dislogic to the entire argument that Rey is overpowered unless you think the same of Anakin and Luke, isn't there?
Did you watch a different version of RotJ than I did?
Yes, the same Luke whose inherently strong Force powers allowed him to make a 1 in a million shot to blow up the first Death Star, who had hardly any training at all (Obi-Wan taught him a day's worth of training before dying at Vader's hands, and Yoda taught him merely Force manipulation and balance focus, I don't remember him flipping around and teaching Luke lightsaber dueling skills like in the Prequels).
It just seems people are rushing to apply the Mary Sue label despite the obvious hints of her genealogy and prior training, and personally, I find it silly.
I mean, it's the classic hero's journey arc:
Hero discovers talents/destiny beyond their previous scope, embark on journey to defeat antagonist/accomplish quest.
Hero then discovers limitations of that power, must embark on further quest to train/hone/overcome their shortcomings, often unsuccessfully to a degree in second chapter.
Hero then overcomes, often at great personal sacrifice in third chapter.
We've only gotten the first chapter so far, so... aren't these complaints premature, considering that?
Unless there are different rules for chicks?![]()
I would if he did ALL of them, Then again I didn't like his character anyway,
Not really. Luke blew up death star in first movie so he had pilot part , Anakin first film had podracing + building c3p0 and People still complained about him so having shooting , piloting , lightsabering , forcing + correcting Han = I would complain. I complained at Anakin in episode 1 when he was a bad character too. so yes there is a "some odd double standard at play." Episode I male lead = everyone complain , Fault episode VII with female and it's wrong!
The flashbacks though never said it was her remembering and seemed to be more "visions" so I would not count them, The Force abilities as I said felt out of no where
Really? so in a new hope + Phantom Menace , They both had piloting , shooting guns at military , correcting han solo (who wouldn't even let luke touch much fyi) out lightsabered a force user and more? no they didnt they had 2.
I meant IV , if in IX shes grown I have 0 complaint but she has grown too fast ant too convenient
That's 1 thing and it was mentioned he shot for a living. That's okay. If she had only resisted the mind torture cool , only used saber , cool. or only any of her other feats then cool . But ALL is silly.
Apparently there is "different rules for chicks" As the prequels people hated it anytime Anakin had something similar to luke and hated in phantom menace BUT if we fault Rey her sex means that's the only reason and she must be protected, THAT is sexist. The idea that faulting a woman is due to her sex. Like you cant look past it.
I complained when Anakain built c3p0 , I complained when he said yippee , I complained when he blew up what i call "my first death star" in episode I. And i complain at Rey but hey that's me I see characters and story not sex. Hence I insulted Kylo too and I insulted "Harrison Bored" in VI. I mocked Dooku and complained at the clones in II. Sorry I believe characters should be critiqued equally.
Doesn't matter if she's luke's daughter or not it's not revealed in this movie. It's like I can watch spider-man 1 and not think "sandman killed uncle ben" as a movie they need to explain it. As the "we'll explain stuff later" means in this movie she's overpowered out of no where.
The limit is what I put on any character. You cant do it all it's dumb to do that. As for your
"We can both agree there was no huge outcry that Anakin or Luke were overpowered in their trilogies, so why is it such a common complaint about Rey?"
YES THERE was. Not for Luke but can not say no one said "Oh he's whinny" if Anakin expressed emotion, People were outraged they made Anakin the chosen one. People complained about anything prequel era Anakin did. People complained he was OP during movies + clone wars. Personally I liked him and thought he was flawed enough his OP made him far from perfect.
This film with Rey she is OP. Could they explain it later? yes but a first film of a trilogy shouldn't need an explanation that huge to justify a character. As it stands I'd use the Mary sue for her as in this movie there's 0 point to anyone other than her. Finn was a tropper but so? she can out gun him. It just seems silly. She felt too powerful to quick. Like Luke did not feel too powerful in IV or Anakin in I , they did in VI and III. She just felt too good too powerful and had no flaws to me. Can she get better? yes like i said I love prequel Anakin BUT i admit i hate episode I anakin. Maybe I'll like VIII and IX Rey but I dont like VII Rey and I feel people feel shes OP they can say it, and I feel this movie didn't do a good job of finding balance between be chosen by destiny + desert Girl.