Megatron
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 4, 2022
- Messages
- 3,500
Good luck Mr. Jozaca. Since I am a fan, I will certanly help you out. If you need.I am going to start a timeline, but if anyone has a better idea, feel free to start your own timeline.
Good luck Mr. Jozaca. Since I am a fan, I will certanly help you out. If you need.I am going to start a timeline, but if anyone has a better idea, feel free to start your own timeline.
Yes, we did one back in the day on the 24 Wiki. (https://24.fandom.com/wiki/Timeline) I also did a lot of work on a much more detailed one, but never finished it, sadly. The show has a sliding timescale, where each season takes place more than a year after the previous season (sometimes several years), yet it always takes place in the "present", so we went with a "relative" timeline for the Wiki. All novels, comics and short films are included as well.Out of curiosity, has anyone considered doing a timeline for the 24 series? Given that the show takes place in real-time (each episode being set within an hour), would be interesting to see, especially with the various novels, comics and even PS2 game.
the whole Tina Minoru thing is one of those problems where I end up making a fan theory that is wildly more complex then it needs to be.I don't really know where to ask this, and I don't want to start a new thread.
https://marvel.fandom.com/wiki/Tina_Minoru_(Earth-199999)Do you guys view Tina Minoru in Doctor Strange as a different character to the version seen in Runaways or the same? Kevin Feige stated that the Doctor Strange character was just an easter egg and the Runaways creators say that the Doctor Strange version has no baring on them, but the Prelude confirms the same name. Also, later seasons kinda make it make sense, since Tina recognises the Dark Dimension corruption in Nico's eyes, and she was at the Hong Kong Sanctum during Kaecilius' attack. I do believe that, officially, they're separate characters. It's messier like that to me though. Two separate magical characters with the same name with their own staff of one in the same universe?
The Marvel wiki actually combines the characters, which, if nothing else, makes for an interesting read. Since we only see her only briefly in Doctor Strange and its Prelude comic, it doesn't really present any huge issues for me. That's just my take though.
Told you Bumblebee and Rise of the Beasts was part of the Bayverse. Now... how did Unicron merge with Earth? LolBut what's interesting is, and you will appreciate this as a fan, at the end of Bumblebee, Optimus comes to Earth. What he's experienced is failure, probably for the first time in his life, right? He's had to retreat, he's leaving the planet Cybertron. What's happened to him from that experience? When we meet him in 2007, he's a particular person, if you would. In 1994, he's not the same person. He still has growth to do between '94 and 2007. So the character arc for Optimus in this, and the fun for the audience is, when you first meet Optimus – and we've had this experience because we've watched it with audiences and we've heard them talk about it – they're like, "It's definitely Optimus, but there's something a little different…" At first, they're like, "Wait, what, who… what Optimus is this?" And by the end of the movie, Optimus has become the guy that you've recognized from the Bay movies. Emotional.
I Hope It Isn't true, but we will see.https://collider.com/transformers-rise-of-the-beasts-michael-bay-movies-producer-comments/
Told you Bumblebee and Rise of the Beasts was part of the Bayverse. Now... how did Unicron merge with Earth? Lol
Why you don't want that?I Hope It Isn't true, but we will see.
"I kept telling marketing that that's what we should say, that this is the only direct sequel. I guess you could argue 'Dracula's Daughter' is a sequel because the opening scene is the aftermath of the Tod Browning movie, but Bela Lugosi's not in it, it's a whole different set of characters. And it's a great movie, it's wild if you haven't seen it. I thought the movie was great. But to me, this is the only real direct sequel with the Dracula and the Renfield of that movie. So yeah, I wish they'd use that in the marketing. I think that would've been a funny way of positioning this movie. The longest time between the original movie and the sequel, beating 'Psycho,' or whatever. I guess 'Avatar' maybe now, since it feels like a long time since the first one."
https://collider.com/transformers-rise-of-the-beasts-michael-bay-movies-producer-comments/
Told you Bumblebee and Rise of the Beasts was part of the Bayverse. Now... how did Unicron merge with Earth? Lol

View attachment 1071
???? - Transformers One
1987 - Bumblebee
1987 - Agent Burns: Welcome to Sector 7
1989 - Sector 7 Adventures: The Battle at Half Dome
1994 - Transformers: Rise of the Beasts
2000 - 28 Days
2003 - Transformers: Beginnings
2007 - Transformers
2008 - Friday the 13th
2009 - Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen
2010 - Transformers: Cyber Missions 1x01-1x13
2013 - Transformers: Dark of the Moon
2013 - Transformers: Dark of the Moon
2018 - Transformers: Age of Extinction
2023 - Transformers: The Last Knight
Notes:
-Yes, I'm including 28 Days and Friday the 13th in this listing. You can't stop me! Muhahahaha!
-The tie-in comics take place in an alternate timeline where only the first three movies are canon apparently. I guess the Bumblebee prequel comic would fit here maybe (?), though it connects with The Last Knight's depiction of Bumblebee being on Earth since WW2.
I just saw that it featured Lockdown, so yeah. That makes sense. Transformers: Beginnings might be part of the Expanded Live-Action Universe too.Cyber Missions is in the expanded live-action universe. The main one has only the movies. IDK what is agent Burns and beginnings, but Sector 7 adventures might be canon if the fact thet Bumblebee wasn't a reboot is true.
and agent burns?I just saw that it featured Lockdown, so yeah. That makes sense. Transformers: Beginnings might be part of the Expanded Live-Action Universe too.
Bumblebee had a prequel comic based on an earlier version of the film as well, but he was on Earth between 1945-1987 in that comic since it was based on an earlier version. In the canon, Bumblebee must have returned to Cybertron before reaching Earth again in 1987, since apparently Bumblebee and Transformers: Rise of the Beasts are still connected officially.
It's a short video on the home release of Bumblebee.and agent burns?
View attachment 1071
???? - Transformers One
1987 - Bumblebee
1987 - Agent Burns: Welcome to Sector 7
1989 - Sector 7 Adventures: The Battle at Half Dome
1994 - Transformers: Rise of the Beasts
2000 - 28 Days
2003 - Transformers: Beginnings
2007 - Transformers
2008 - Friday the 13th
2009 - Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen
2013 - Transformers: Dark of the Moon
2013 - Transformers: Dark of the Moon
2018 - Transformers: Age of Extinction
2023 - Transformers: The Last Knight
Notes:
-Yes, I'm including 28 Days and Friday the 13th in this listing. You can't stop me! Muhahahaha!
-The tie-in comics take place in an alternate timeline where only the first three movies are canon apparently. I guess the Bumblebee prequel comic would fit here maybe (?), though it connects with The Last Knight's depiction of Bumblebee being on Earth since WW2.
also saw a possible shared universe with G. I. Joe (not a new thing in the franchaise) but anyway, it's canon?It's a short video on the home release of Bumblebee.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transformers_(film_series)Agent Burns: Welcome to Sector 7 (2019)
A short released as an in-universe orientation video, of Agent Burns addressing new hires.
could it be in the Sector 7 ARG timeline?It's a short video on the home release of Bumblebee.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transformers_(film_series)Agent Burns: Welcome to Sector 7 (2019)
A short released as an in-universe orientation video, of Agent Burns addressing new hires.
I think it says that they haven't seen any Deceptions for 3 years or something along those lines, implying that it's 3 years after ROTF rather than 4 years.oh and with the Dark of the movie prequel game is a mistery, it contradicts the prequel comics so it isn't in the expanded universe, but seems to coontradict the movies too, don't remember but one guy in the tf wiki asked about this and Chris (the guy who do the basics) says it isn't canon in the main movie universe. (I personally didn't find any, telling only for advise you)
Probably not. I doubt that would be the intention anyway.could it be in the Sector 7 ARG timeline?
I'm not making any timeline of it right now, but sure. If I did make one, of course you can.If I can make a suggestion I would wait for rise of the beasts to come out, if the movie proves that the prequel route it's true, then if you want you can make a timeline, since I will do this in the far future I will certanly start with the expanded universe one. If you make the timeline can I use it for the Multiverse Order I did for Transformers?
Yup Cyber Missions is canon, it is set after Revenge of the Fallen funny enough. https://bwspotlight.com/2019/10/19/...e-transformers-cyber-missions/comment-page-1/Cyber Missions is in the expanded live-action universe. The main one has only the movies. IDK what is agent Burns and beginnings, but Sector 7 adventures might be canon if the fact thet Bumblebee wasn't a reboot is true.
It is funny to see someone using the thing I wrote (with sources + I own Bumblebee on Blu-ray) on wikipedia, yeah of course it was proofread by someone else, english is not my first language, but yeahIt's a short video on the home release of Bumblebee.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transformers_(film_series)Agent Burns: Welcome to Sector 7 (2019)
A short released as an in-universe orientation video, of Agent Burns addressing new hires.
This is the longest running cinematic universe... wowLooking back at this, it's possible he's saying that this is the only "direct" sequel. Dracula's Daughter doesn't feature Dracula. Son of Dracula doesn't feature Dracula. The only films that feature Dracula after the 1931 film are crossovers like House of Frankenstein.
Now, Renfield isn't present in those films since he was supposed to be dead in the 1931 film, so that would be an issue. Renfield appears to retcon it so that Dracula let him live to serve.
Other than that, there's a possibility all these films are the same universe.
1899 - Frankenstein
1899 - The Bride of Frankenstein
1931 - Dracula
1931 - Dracula's Daughter
1931 - The Invisible Man
1935 - Werewolf of London
1939 - Son of Frankenstein
1939 - The Wolf Man
1940 - The Invisible Man Returns
1940 - The Invisible Woman
1941 - Invisible Agent
1942 - The Ghost of Frankenstein
1943 - Frankenstein Meets the Wolf Man
1943 - Son of Dracula
1944 - House of Frankenstein
1944 - The Invisible Man's Revenge
1946 - House of Dracula
1948 - Meet Frankenstein
1951 - Meet the Invisible Man
2023 - Renfield
Technically speaking, if we include novel crossovers as canon then The Mummy's Hand series is canon. Then, if we include the sequel mobile game that you can't even find anymore of The Mummy (2017), then The Mummy/Scorpion King films are canon because that game crosses over with The Mummy's Hand. The Mummy (2017) had references to the Creature from the Black Lagoon so that would be canon too. The longest running shared universe, lol.