Synch
Well-Known Member
Why not? Maybe he created him to die. If he didn't, why is this character so lame?
If he created him to die, to me, unless he serves a good actual purpose, than his character was pointless from the beggining. The character may be lame to you, but that doesn't mean it was because he was meant to be killed off. All he had was small cameos in Date Night, and just started to go into his character (somewhat) in the new issue.Synch said:Why not? Maybe he created him to die. If he didn't, why is this character so lame?
Ice said:I don't see Kirkman killing off his own creation. Don't see that happening anytime at all, but we never know.
Ah, but Walking Dead is something different to this, but I get you mean.E.Vi.L. said:Technically, Walking Dead is all about creating characters that will sooner ot later die.
And the last reality altering villain in the X-Men pages bought the farm in a single arc.
Since thart guy obviously isn't going to become a permament team member, seems too danagerous to be free and probably isn't intended to become an ongoing villain, I'd say it's about 50% he dies before the end of Kirkman's run.
You make a compelling arguement for his demized. Is he even an ultimatized 616 character? I would be more inclined to think he would be more willing to kill off a totally new character, but he might think his own creation is something to be treasured.E.Vi.L. said:Technically, Walking Dead is all about creating characters that will sooner ot later die.
And the last reality altering villain in the X-Men pages bought the farm in a single arc.
Since thart guy obviously isn't going to become a permament team member, seems too dangerous to be free and probably isn't intended to become an ongoing villain, I'd say it's about 50% he dies before the end of Kirkman's run.
That's far to creative for Kirkman.Maybe Magician will be like, "Man, you know what'd be cool--"
Then Zombies will bash through a window and eat him, then disappear.
It does change colors once but that's the colorist's mistake and not Oliver's, right? I didn't see any more changes.batdog said:Jean Greys costume was different on every page...
vintsukka said:EDIT: Okay, her pants did change quite dramatically, didn't notice that the first time.
Yeah like once and a while she had the back covered, othertimes it wasnt, did i miss something? when was he costume different than the one on the cover(her origional one?) , i still havent read magnetic north or hard lessons so i might have missed the change. I also think the cover was a bit pointless and misleading, do wolverine and cyclops even have a conversation in this issue? let alone occupy the same room?vintsukka said:It does change colors once but that's the colorist's mistake and not Oliver's, right? I didn't see any more changes.
But overall, I agree the art wasn't up to par. I miss Immonen.
EDIT: Okay, her pants did change quite dramatically, didn't notice that the first time.
The thing I noticed is first her pants have either holes or skin-colored patches on the side, but then in another panel they're gone. Then back again. Also, in one shot on page 4 her top is colored yellow, when everywhere else it's blue.batdog said:Yeah like once and a while she had the back covered, othertimes it wasnt, did i miss something? when was he costume different than the one on the cover(her origional one?) , i still havent read magnetic north or hard lessons so i might have missed the change. I also think the cover was a bit pointless and misleading, do wolverine and cyclops even have a conversation in this issue? let alone occupy the same room?
I noticed her yellow back on some panels.vintsukka said:The thing I noticed is first her pants have either holes or skin-colored patches on the side, but then in another panel they're gone. Then back again. Also, in one shot on page 4 her top is colored yellow, when everywhere else it's blue.
It's been like that since issue #54, so I can't see the problem here.BerserkerX said:But no, under the recap shows something that IS happening in the current comic. Try sticking to one, either put the panels of the previous comic or the present one.
That was the Thor one, right? Well, at least it hinted a little what the issue was about. In UXM #69 the cover is Cyclops and Wolverine fighting for Jean, but in the issue Wolverine doesn't interact with either of them and Cyclops and Jean only see each other briefly. And by the looks of it, Wolverine is going after Hulk, so the cover has nothing to do with anything coming up in this arc either.Ice said:Remember. Just because you see something on the cover, does not necessarilly mean it's what's going on in the issue itself. Remeber Ultimates 2 #5?
Right, but the point is that just because you see something on the cover does not mean it's what's going on in the issue. The cover these days are not like the covers of yesteryear.vintsukka said:That was the Thor one, right? Well, at least it hinted a little what the issue was about. In UXM #69 the cover is Cyclops and Wolverine fighting for Jean, but in the issue Wolverine doesn't interact with either of them and Cyclops and Jean only see each other briefly. And by the looks of it, Wolverine is going after Hulk, so the cover has nothing to do with anything coming up in this arc either.
Hi-Fi said:Wow, I really loved this issue. The Rogue/Logan interaction made me smile for some reason. The characters are acting like themselves, continuity is respected, everything about this issue was awesome. Good job, Mr. Kirkman. After a weak first arc, this one promises to be good.
vintsukka said:That was the Thor one, right? Well, at least it hinted a little what the issue was about. In UXM #69 the cover is Cyclops and Wolverine fighting for Jean, but in the issue Wolverine doesn't interact with either of them and Cyclops and Jean only see each other briefly. And by the looks of it, Wolverine is going after Hulk, so the cover has nothing to do with anything coming up in this arc either.
616 Wolverine is 5'3" and Ultimate Wolvie is listed as 5'9".And Wolverine is about 6 feet, it not a bit more. So he's at least (if not taller) than Cyclops.