X-Men Cinematic Universe - Timeline (Revised & Original)

I still don't understand why Earth-10005 isn't treated the same as the Earth-616 designation. To me, Earth-10005's number even being used seems similar enough to the MCU's diverged realities being numbered as "616-??" (or something along those lines) in Loki, which, if anything, suggests that the number is because Deadpool could be from a 10005 reality, not the 10005 reality. A branched timeline that the TVA catalogues as being the same number but a variation of it.
 
My headcanon for the X-Men timelines are

10005:
First Class
Origins Wolverine
X-Men
X2
Last Stand
The Wolverine
The Gifted
Days of Future Past

10005 (Revised):
First Class
Days of Future Past (1973 scenes only)
Apocalypse
Dark Phoenix
Deadpool
Deadpool 2
Days of Future Past (new 2023 ending)
New Mutants
Logan

10005 (TVA Revised):
First Class
Days of Future Past (1973 scenes only)
Apocalypse
Dark Phoenix
Deadpool
Deadpool 2
Days of Future Past (new 2023 ending)
Deadpool and Wolverine

I know there are other revisions to the timeline like cable's original future and Venessa's death which to be fair could still be one and the same timeline. But because in this universe changing the past overrides the present instead of creating branches.
 
I feel like in the beginning of Deadpool and Wolverine, the TVA created a branch where the events in that film occurred and after they accelerated the decay of the revised timeline due to the time ripper, we had basically nothing, no Fox X-men timeline, it then regenerated with a different anchor being Logan in place of the OG Logan which regenerated the same past events (possibly erasing the OG Logan from the universe to make up for the other Logan) up to the present (Deadpool & Wolverine) and now everything past that point is new territory
 
Okay, I don't mind any of that except changing past events and erasing Fox's Wolverine. That just seems unnecessary, you can have two of the same person in one universe without any issues.
 
Here's what I'm not getting (though the answer might be simpler than I think and I'm just stupid)
If The New Mutants takes place in an overall the same timeline as the other movies, why didn't Colossus mention he has a sister? Or was she already put away before this?
 
myusernameyes said:
Here's what I'm not getting (though the answer might be simpler than I think and I'm just stupid)
If The New Mutants takes place in an overall the same timeline as the other movies, why didn't Colossus mention he has a sister? Or was she already in the already put away before this?
Click to expand...
Well, there's quite an age difference.
 
Also, why do people have to mention things for them to be true? I go to work and talk to the people I work with but none of them know I have two older twin brothers about a decade older than me. For the people I know, they might as well not even exist. Why does Colossus have to mention his much younger sister?
 
Pro Bot said:
I still don't understand why Earth-10005 isn't treated the same as the Earth-616 designation. To me, Earth-10005's number even being used seems similar enough to the MCU's diverged realities being numbered as "616-??" (or something along those lines) in Loki, which, if anything, suggests that the number is because Deadpool could be from a 10005 reality, not the 10005 reality. A branched timeline that the TVA catalogues as being the same number but a variation of it.
Click to expand...
My whole issue with the Marvel Database's logic is that even rewritten timelines have a new number.

No official timeline is like "E-10005 Revised" or "E-10005B" - those are PLACEHOLDERS.
 
For instance, any one of the Spider-Verse "B" earths could end up being "Earth-6939843" or whatever somewhere down the road.
I think there's ample evidence for Logan being the future of this new "E-10005"; therefore it's Earth-17315.

We'll see how Doomsday acknowledges this, but I don't see why it would be ignored. It's important information that I think hasn't been revealed to us.
 
''After Wade and Logan saved the FoX-Men universe from the Time Ripper, the universe regenerated with Unheroic Logan becoming the FoX-Men Wolverine. The FoX-Men Wolverine was erased, but the events of the past remained the same, only now, the universe "remembers" Unheroic Logan as the one who lived them. The aura of Earth-10005's Wolverine lives on in him, making it feel like he was always the Wolverine of that world. The past is intact, but the future is brand new.''

Also, I have this headcanon: ''Wolverine and older X-23/Laura prevent Xavier's dementia and seizure by giving him early treatment, Beast will create an medicine to Charles, starting in 2024, after the events of DP&W, to not causing the Xavier's incident, since Laura knows about the Weischester's incident of 2028, mentioned in Logan. Also they go after Essex/Transigen organization very early, with X-Men, before 2029, they will also save the young Laura and X-23 children early too. The events of Logan will not happen after the events of Deadpool & Wolverine.''

I will use this headcanon, because will be weird when the X-Men appears in Doomsday with DP&W's Logan, without/instead FoX-Men Wolverine, so if didn't have a explanation, I will use this headcanon.
 
In Logan, it is stated that no new mutants have been born since 2004, but, in the 2023's ending in Days of Future Past, mutant teens and children are shown who are far too young to have been born in 2004:

Xavier said that he wants to open the school to both mutants and humans in X-Men: Apocalypse. It stands to reason that he did exactly that. Some of those children/teens in the mansion were not mutants but actually humans. In fact, there are still mutants born after 2004 (as seen in DOFP and Deadpool 2), but far fewer were born, almost none after 2004, so practically no more mutants born after 2004, the line ''no new mutants is born in 25 years'' said by Logan, it just being a exaggeration, because very few mutants have being born per year, post-2004.

This make sense? I thought this headcanon/explanation to fix the plot holes
 
Last edited:
Pro Bot said:
He grew it back.
Click to expand...
Xavier's hair loss in X-Men: Apocalypse wasn't permanent. Over the decades following 1983, he experienced some minimal hair regrowth, at the back of his head. However, he consistently kept it shaved. By the time of Logan, because of his dementia, he stopped maintaining his appearance, including shaving his head. That's why he has a bit of hair in Logan. - This my headcanon/explanation.
 
Regsta said:
In Logan, it is stated that no new mutants have been born since 2004, but, in the 2023's ending in Days of Future Past, mutant teens and children are shown who are far too young to have been born in 2004:

Xavier said that he wants to open the school to both mutants and humans in X-Men: Apocalypse. It stands to reason that he did exactly that. Some of those children/teens in the mansion were not mutants but actually humans. In fact, there are still mutants born after 2004 (as seen in DOFP and Deadpool 2), but far fewer were born, almost none after 2004, so practically no more mutants born after 2004, the line ''no new mutants is born in 25 years'' said by Logan, it just being a exaggeration, because very few mutants have being born per year, post-2004.

This make sense? I thought this headcanon/explanation to fix the plot holes
Click to expand...
I don't think Deadpool 2 proves that, but The New Mutants certainly does.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Back
Top