X-Men Cinematic Universe - Timeline (Revised & Original)

I still don't understand why Earth-10005 isn't treated the same as the Earth-616 designation. To me, Earth-10005's number even being used seems similar enough to the MCU's diverged realities being numbered as "616-??" (or something along those lines) in Loki, which, if anything, suggests that the number is because Deadpool could be from a 10005 reality, not the 10005 reality. A branched timeline that the TVA catalogues as being the same number but a variation of it.
 
My headcanon for the X-Men timelines are

10005:
First Class
Origins Wolverine
X-Men
X2
Last Stand
The Wolverine
The Gifted
Days of Future Past

10005 (Revised):
First Class
Days of Future Past (1973 scenes only)
Apocalypse
Dark Phoenix
Deadpool
Deadpool 2
Days of Future Past (new 2023 ending)
New Mutants
Logan

10005 (TVA Revised):
First Class
Days of Future Past (1973 scenes only)
Apocalypse
Dark Phoenix
Deadpool
Deadpool 2
Days of Future Past (new 2023 ending)
Deadpool and Wolverine

I know there are other revisions to the timeline like cable's original future and Venessa's death which to be fair could still be one and the same timeline. But because in this universe changing the past overrides the present instead of creating branches.
 
I feel like in the beginning of Deadpool and Wolverine, the TVA created a branch where the events in that film occurred and after they accelerated the decay of the revised timeline due to the time ripper, we had basically nothing, no Fox X-men timeline, it then regenerated with a different anchor being Logan in place of the OG Logan which regenerated the same past events (possibly erasing the OG Logan from the universe to make up for the other Logan) up to the present (Deadpool & Wolverine) and now everything past that point is new territory
 
Okay, I don't mind any of that except changing past events and erasing Fox's Wolverine. That just seems unnecessary, you can have two of the same person in one universe without any issues.
 
Here's what I'm not getting (though the answer might be simpler than I think and I'm just stupid)
If The New Mutants takes place in an overall the same timeline as the other movies, why didn't Colossus mention he has a sister? Or was she already put away before this?
 
Here's what I'm not getting (though the answer might be simpler than I think and I'm just stupid)
If The New Mutants takes place in an overall the same timeline as the other movies, why didn't Colossus mention he has a sister? Or was she already in the already put away before this?
Well, there's quite an age difference.
 
Also, why do people have to mention things for them to be true? I go to work and talk to the people I work with but none of them know I have two older twin brothers about a decade older than me. For the people I know, they might as well not even exist. Why does Colossus have to mention his much younger sister?
 
I still don't understand why Earth-10005 isn't treated the same as the Earth-616 designation. To me, Earth-10005's number even being used seems similar enough to the MCU's diverged realities being numbered as "616-??" (or something along those lines) in Loki, which, if anything, suggests that the number is because Deadpool could be from a 10005 reality, not the 10005 reality. A branched timeline that the TVA catalogues as being the same number but a variation of it.
My whole issue with the Marvel Database's logic is that even rewritten timelines have a new number.

No official timeline is like "E-10005 Revised" or "E-10005B" - those are PLACEHOLDERS.
 
For instance, any one of the Spider-Verse "B" earths could end up being "Earth-6939843" or whatever somewhere down the road.
I think there's ample evidence for Logan being the future of this new "E-10005"; therefore it's Earth-17315.

We'll see how Doomsday acknowledges this, but I don't see why it would be ignored. It's important information that I think hasn't been revealed to us.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top