I know , but most cartoons do the old oh it just happens randomly or do not explain it well. Batman forever didn't even do it like batman TAS and that was a live action film with no excuse.
I'm not defending the Two-Face from Batman Forever, because he was easily one of the worst things about that film, but the reason why they didn't delve so deeply into his character is because he only existed as a secondary character in that film. They didn't see him as being as important as the Riddler, who was given a fairly decent origin (even if it was more suited to the Mad Hatter or Hugo Strange).
I don't think the joker got an origin properly in Batman TAS I know he didn't in the The Batman.
I think the reason for that was because, similar to the way they didn't go right back to the start and do Batman's origin; they didn't want to retread too much on movie territory. Something similar happened on Spider-Man's animated series a few years later: because there was a movie in the early stages when the first few episodes were being produced, it was decided that the show would not deal with Spidey's origin and also as a general rule of thumb, because they would probably die in the movie (as most comic book villains did at the time), it was decided that Electro and Sandman (who were the planned villains) would not appear in the animated series. Electro eventually made a few appearances toward the end, but Sandman was never used.
The only movie villain in
Batman: The Animated Series (at that point) who got a decent origin was Catwoman, and that was partly because they completely (and successfully) revamped her from her stupidly gothic movie counterpart.
So yeah the two face thing was a great surprise
I'd love to just completely forget everything I know about
Batman: The Animated Series. Completely block out every episode, every moment, every sound out of my consciousness. Then, I'd go back and read and watch every Batman-related thing ever. That way, I think I'd enjoy BTAS and all the villain revamps a whole lot more.
In other news, I watched Superman: Doomsday today. I didn't think it was all it was cracked up to be, unfortunately. I wanted a Superman version of the
Mask of the Phantasm that totally retooled the sub-par Superman animated series, and instead, all I got was a reasonably decent 90-minute episode, complete with nods galore to the 90s episodes and the DCAU in general.
The special feature documentary "Requiem and Rebirth" or whatever it's called was excellent and only served to further my belief that the "Death of" trilogy in the comics is entirely under-rated and is a perfect send-off to the Byrne-style Superman (even though Byrne had nothing to do with the project). After that trilogy, Superman just became mindless, ***-kicking, 90sman.
I think my biggest problem (especially after watching the documentary) was that the film focused too strongly on the mindless action and dull exposition of Superman dying and Superman coming back to life, rather than focusing on what Superman meant to the world. A lot of people forget that the events that followed The Death of Superman weren't dark or bleak at all, they were some of the most star-spangled, feel-good, Christopher Reevey Superman stories ever and in that respect, I think this movie should have been a lot brighter and should have been called "
Superman Lives!" rather than "
Superman: Doomsday".
Lastly, I think the violence was wholly over-rated. Everyone kept going on about the blood and all that; but really there's only one bit where Superman coughs up a bit of blood and if you blink, you might even miss it. Also, there's some bad
ish language forced into the film, which also annoyed me. They say "frickin" a few times and Perry White very uncharacteristically throws in an "***" here and there, but it never really seemed like things people would actually say. Maybe it was just because it was an animated feature, I don't know.
Anyway, overall, I'd give this film a 6.5/10. I'd say that my reaction to this film is similar to Planet-Man's reaction to
Superman Returns: pretty good, but not as good as it should or could have been.