I'm sorry but I gotta disagree with every sentence here...Can y'all just allow Marvel be respectful of one of their own's Death for 1 movie? Just 1? Like Damn. I'm sure this isn't the end of Tchalla as a character. Let them breathe for a minute from a highly significant loss
I found the question from the second photo at https://news.yahoo.com/charlie-cox-talks-putting-daredevils-020143773.htmlI think this comes from the interview with Variety ... But the second photo I can't identify in the article
Oh okay, thanks!I found the question from the second photo at https://news.yahoo.com/charlie-cox-talks-putting-daredevils-020143773.html
Looks like an interview with Entertainment Weekly.
Posting here in case anyone wants to discuss, I haven't seen it yet so idk how it lines up with the timeline here
Geekritique's Placement is Summer 2025 ending in August. Always nice when everyone's ideas line up
You have no idea what Marvel is planning to do. You don't know that this is the end of Tchalla. Sure, they may be killing him in this movie, but no one has any idea of the future.I'm sorry but I gotta disagree with every sentence here...
It's not just one movie that's lost T'Challa, it's the entire franchise, both the Black Panther films and MCU as a whole
This is litterally the end of T'Challa, they're killing him off screen and then jumping a year forward.
This isn't them breathing after a significant loss, breathing after a significant loss would be stopping production of the film until such a time as they can move forward with the character. I mean before Boseman's death the films was set for release in May 2022, it was only delayed by 6 months to November. That's not a breath, this isnt even the longest delay a Marvel film has seen.
They're killing T'Challa have said they won't recast. That is their plan for the future. And if they just are going to hypothetically recast anyway then they should've delayed this film until then or set this film in a way where they don't need T'Challa (like during the snap)You have no idea what Marvel is planning to do. You don't know that this is the end of Tchalla. Sure, they may be killing him in this movie, but no one has any idea of the future.
My point is they shouldn't have "scrambled together" a film to "salvage" it. I'm sorry a 6 month delay only for the detah of the titular character's actor? If their decisions were truly about honoring Boseman, this film wouldn't have rushed it's production during this time.The team on this movie had their world turned upside down when Chadwick died. They're doing their best with the tools they had. Things can change in the future. These are properties based on comic books where no one ever stays dead. Just enjoy this film that they scrambled together to salvage, that looks amazing, may I add, and then worry about it afterward?
Quite frankly everyone here has been very respectful of the fact that Boseman loss was very tragic and a difficult situation either way. But people can still respectfully disagree. What you're doing coming here and insulting people because of it however is not respectful. Save that for Reddit, you'll fit right in there.Like, I don't think y'all understand how disrespectful you sound right now?
No one has said this so I don't know why it's in quotations. You want to quote us do it properly. But as you said, Chadwick Boseman is not Black Panther. But no one wants to forget him, he will always be missed. This isn't about "having our little chatacter" for me at least this is about properly honoring Boseman. I honestly find the fact that they just wrote his character out of the universe and moved on with the franchise as quickly as possible with, as a said before, a minor 6 month delay far more disrespectful than giving this film and the people involved the time it needed to mourn, recast and resume properly"He wasn't black Panther. Forget about Chadwick, anyone can play him. Doesn't matter, as long as I have my little character"
Yes he is a real person with real family. A family who has commented on the fact that T'Challa and all the character means shouldn't die with him and if they properly wanted to honor Boseman they'd have him live on.This is a real person, with real family and real friends and real relationships that it sounds like everyone adored. This was a hit on everyone. Fans feel so entitled "real fans deserve this" "you aren't thinking about the fans"
This is a real life person.
No one has said the film won't be fine, in fact I think most here have spoken highly about the fact that it looks great. But you should never let a company "do what they're gonna do" when you think it was a wrong decision. If people think a company they support could've made a better call they have every right to voice it.Let Marvel do what they're gonna do. I'm sure it'll turn out fine
Ok. I admit I went a little off the rails. The comments I've been seeing really rubbed me the wrong way. And maybe i have been scrolling reddit a little too much lately. But I get passionate when it comes to human empathy. And the comments about recasting seem very lacking in empathy to me. It really does feel like a fan entitlement thing to me.Oh boy there's a lot to unpack here but I'll try to do this in the politest way I can and I suggest if you want to continue discussing this, you try to be respectful as well. You can disagree and not be insulting and as before I have to disagree with every sentence here
They're killing T'Challa have said they won't recast. That is their plan for the future. And if they just are going to hypothetically recast anyway then they should've delayed this film until then or set this film in a way where they don't need T'Challa (like during the snap)
My point is they shouldn't have "scrambled together" a film to "salvage" it. I'm sorry a 6 month delay only for the detah of the titular character's actor? If their decisions were truly about honoring Boseman, this film wouldn't have rushed it's production during this time.
Quite frankly everyone here has been very respectful of the fact that Boseman loss was very tragic and a difficult situation either way. But people can still respectfully disagree. What you're doing coming here and insulting people because of it however is not respectful. Save that for Reddit, you'll fit right in there.
No one has said this so I don't know why it's in quotations. You want to quote us do it properly. But as you said, Chadwick Boseman is not Black Panther. But no one wants to forget him, he will always be missed. This isn't about "having our little chatacter" for me at least this is about properly honoring Boseman. I honestly find the fact that they just wrote his character out of the universe and moved on with the franchise as quickly as possible with, as a said before, a minor 6 month delay far more disrespectful than giving this film and the people involved the time it needed to mourn, recast and resume properly
Yes he is a real person with real family. A family who has commented on the fact that T'Challa and all the character means shouldn't die with him and if they properly wanted to honor Boseman they'd have him live on.
No one has said the film won't be fine, in fact I think most here have spoken highly about the fact that it looks great. But you should never let a company "do what they're gonna do" when you think it was a wrong decision. If people think a company they support could've made a better call they have every right to voice it.
When will these be updated?1084
????
Eternals - The 500 Year War: Infinite #2 (pg. ?-?)
1142
????
Eternals - The 500 Year War: Infinite #3 (pg. ?-?)
1236
June 29
Eternals - The 500 Year War: Infinite #4 (pg. ?-?)
1238
June 29
Eternals - The 500 Year War: Infinite #4 (pg. ?-?)
????
????
Thor - Love and Thunder (0:07:54 - 0:08:09) (Video Only)
1520
????
Eternals - The 500 Year War: Infinite #5 (pg. ?-?)
152?
????
Eternals - The 500 Year War: Infinite #6 (pg. ?-?)
Eternals - The 500 Year War: Infinite #7 (pg. ?-?)
1521
????
Eternals Chapter 5 (0:35:02 - 0:42:58)
152?
????
Eternals - The 500 Year War: Infinite #1 (pg. ?-?)
Eternals - The 500 Year War: Infinite #2 (pg. ?-?)
Eternals - The 500 Year War: Infinite #3 (pg. ?-?)
Eternals - The 500 Year War: Infinite #4 (pg. ?-?)
Eternals - The 500 Year War: Infinite #5 (pg. ?-?)
Eternals - The 500 Year War: Infinite #6 (pg. ?-?)
Eternals - The 500 Year War: Infinite #7 (pg. ?-?)
When will these be updated?
I saw page numbers on a website called comicextra.com but I couldn't view itThe comic is only available digitally, which means there are no page numbers.

Awesome in that case I propose we overwrite what is there now for July-November/December 2024 and put this instead: (just a basic overview of what it would look like)
The fact that there's people that thinks Scott is Spider-Man may be a reference to everyone forgetting it is actually Peter in NWH?
Now that I think about it, it might also make sense for Shang-Chi to play in 2025.I really think they're ignoring the real life date of the Qingming Festival and are going off the July event posters on the bus. It's really no different than what they did with the Signal Festival in FFH (October event in July) and Eid al-Adha in Ms. Marvel (June event in September). It's like they want to include these cultural events for representation without caring if it lines up timeline wise. If they do see Shang-Chi as July, their timeline would make more sense.
Seeing Groot has grown up since LAT i think 2025 is a nice take for the special's placement, i don't think we're getting information about the specific year in it thoughSo which Christmas are we thinking for the GOTG Holiday Special? 2024 or 2025?
I would agree, but we can't rule out 2024. There are no hard rules to Groot's physiology. He could have growth spurts or stagnations at any age, whatever suits the script.Seeing Groot has grown up since LAT i think 2025 is a nice take for the special's placement, i don't think we're getting information about the specific year in it though
I have Love & Thunder in 2025, so I'm definitely going with the Holiday Special as being 2025. I'm sure Disney + is going to and I doubt there's anything in the special that contradicts that.I would agree, but we can't rule out 2024. There are no hard rules to Groot's physiology. He could have growth spurts or stagnations at any age, whatever suits the script.
I don't see anything that would point to Shang-Chi in 2025. The credit scene simply had Ruffalo and Larson (who's appearance wasn't too shocking since she's appeared in almost of all of Destin Daniel Cretton's films) because they were available to do it.Now that I think about it, it might also make sense for Shang-Chi to play in 2025.
Wong brings Shaun to the (remaining) Avengers at the end, who now only consist of Bruce Banner, Carol Danvers and himself, since Steven Strange is in another dimension (after MoM), Peter Parker is just the "friendly neighborhood Spider-Man" (after NWH) and Clint Barton, completely retired from superhero life, lives with his family (after Hawkeye). What Sam Wilson has been up to since TFATWS, however, also remains a mystery to me, lol.
In She-Hulk, Wong does say that he needs Emil Blonsky to complete his training to become Sorcerer Supreme, but (as Geekritique noted in his video) actually he should have been in that position for years, since Dr. Strange was snapped away. Furthermore, Wong also takes off right after his appearance in NWH, and it looks to me like he's going to the same place he went with Abomination after their fight in Shang-Chi to potentially continue their training. It's also possible that it's a long process for Wong to reach some sort of "final stage" of Sorcerer Supreme, which is why he continues to grind. Or it may actually have a completely different reason why the two spend so much time together and Wong was simply lying in She-Hulk^^.
I agree, while I have Love and Thunder in 2024 I don't think there will be anything to place the GotGHS in 2024 meaning it will fall into 2025 kinda by default. And I definitely think Shang-Chi is 2024I have Love & Thunder in 2025, so I'm definitely going with the Holiday Special as being 2025. I'm sure Disney + is going to and I doubt there's anything in the special that contradicts that.
I don't see anything that would point to Shang-Chi in 2025. The credit scene simply had Ruffalo and Larson (who's appearance wasn't too shocking since she's appeared in almost of all of Destin Daniel Cretton's films) because they were available to do it.
I just don't see any reason to contradict Marvel's own present-day unless there's evidence. I truly think Marvel is using these projects to more easily determine what they see as 2025 and 2026. The same way they did with Hawkeye and 2024 and 2025.I agree, while I have Love and Thunder in 2024 I don't think there will be anything to place the GotGHS in 2024 meaning it will fall into 2025 kinda by default. And I definitely think Shang-Chi is 2024
I'm sorry but he really didn't clear up anything. He makes it clear that chronologically he's probably wrong meaning he doesn't fully know. He placed it after films that released last year and around the last and next film, a pretty generic answer. I doubt anything in this film will contradict the Love and Thunder placement nor will it affect whatever our Quantumania placement is, especially when his basis for this is New Asgard exsists and Love and Thunder released recently. We've never relied on the quotes of people BTS unless they're being exact and he really wasn't. All he said was the film takes place a year after T'Challa's death, something the film will probably make clear. I'm sorry but when someone says he "probably would get it wrong" we shouldn't take their word as law for the timelineBlack Panther 2 Producer Clears Confusion on MCU Timeline Placement. It'll be interesting to see if this actually lines up. If you have Love & Thunder in 2024, obviously it won't given the movie has a time jump of a year since T'Challa's death (apparently it's to the day which means the movie is at the earliest past October 2024, given October 2023 would be the earliest T'Challa could pass). As some one who has Love & Thunder in 2025, I think it could work for me.
I wouldn't say it cleared anything up. But for me it fits with my own placement of Love & Thunder as I assume the ending with Thor and Love battling on the planet is around Fall 2025 (a time jump from the majority of the movie). I wasn't saying it should be used as confirmation of anything.I'm sorry but he really didn't clear up anything. He makes it clear that chronologically he's probably wrong meaning he doesn't fully know. He placed it after films that released last year and around the last and next film, a pretty generic answer. I doubt anything in this film will contradict the Love and Thunder placement nor will it affect whatever our Quantumania placement is. We've never relied on the quotes of people BTS unless they're being exact and he really wasn't. All he said was the film takes place a year after T'Challa's death, something the film will probably make clear. I'm sorry but when someone says he'll probably get it wrong we shouldn't take their word as law for the timeline