You're missing the point though. That is why I said what I said about Phase 2. You want to continue bringing up MK 2025 because there are some who agree, I once did that with my opinion of Phase 2, because like yours, there are others that could agree (I don't know anymore as its been years honestly). For BOTH of our sakes, this forum is beyond that though. We took a poll, the majority placed it, the end. And seriously after what I keep telling you about your posts...do you really think the people that agree with you need reminding...literally every single time? I KNOW HOW YOU FEEL ABOUT MK, LAT, 2024 VS 2025, AND THE D+ TIMELINE, because you continue to remind us.
This forum has it in 2024. D+ has it in 2025. Imagine if every single time someone brings up BP 1, I use every chance possible to plug the Marvel Studio First 10 years book and say they place it in 2017, or I say that's how I have it in my guide. What ACTUAL purpose does it serve at this point when the forum disagrees and has moved on from it?
I'm not asking you to leave as I love debating the timeline with everyone here, I'm asking you to consider what you say in each post. I fixed your two posts to show you that you CAN discuss this stuff without resorting to horn tooting your own guide on the matter. I think you are correct in the month and year of the movie 'based on what we're shown in the movie', and your MIT research is awesome at backing that up to solidify that initial claim. I don't 100% discount D+ as I do find it intriguing where Marvel places things. However, you used their placement as yet another opportunity to plug MK in 2025 and your guide based on the wiki, when all you had to say was She-Hulk is in June 2025 so it stands to reason that BPWF should be late May, and then reiterate the MIT facts to further cement it.
Does that make sense?