selfishmisery
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 1, 2014
- Messages
- 4,277
There's dates that obviously can't work. For example, The Winter Solider having an October 2013 date during Batroc's interrogation or Iron Man 2 having February 2009 dates on Tony's computer screen. Those behind the book can use the ones that work and ignore the ones that don't.Guys, but wasn't the book made with on-screen dates? Now some of them can be ignored? WTF??
That I hope is the case and not Miss Minutes loudly announcing "Never trust onscreen dates".There's dates that obviously can't work. For example, The Winter Solider having an October 2013 date during Batroc's interrogation or Iron Man 2 having February 2009 dates on Tony's computer screen. Those behind the book can use the ones that work and ignore the ones that don't.
I'd be surprised if that were the case. We already know the book places Iron Man in "Spring 2008", so the May 4th, 2008 on the Mad Money segment would be correct. It'd be nice if she pointed out the ones that should be ignored, but that might be too much. As long as the onscreen dates matches with the book's placement, no matter what I assume it's accurate.That I hope is the case and not Miss Minutes loudly announcing "Never trust onscreen dates".
Then that rule would apply to everything...
Yeah I feel like saying *most* onscreen dates aren't accurate would've been a better way of describing it cause there is clearly some that areThat I hope is the case and not Miss Minutes loudly announcing "Never trust onscreen dates".
Then that rule would apply to everything...
I'd be surprised if that were the case. We already know the book places Iron Man in "Spring 2008", so the May 4th, 2008 on the Mad Money segment would be correct. It'd be nice if she pointed out the ones that should be ignored, but that might be too much. As long as the onscreen dates matches with the book's placement, no matter what I assume it's accurate.
Oh that's much better, I like that. Can't wait to get this book tomorrowShe does, sorry if I was unclear before.
At certain points she pops up and says "There was a file here that showed it was X date, but that can't possibly be true" or "Sometimes the paper spreads misinformation" etc.
I'll make note of everything she mentions in my findings.
It's nice that they're aware and having some fun with contradictory dates.She does, sorry if I was unclear before.
At certain points she pops up and says "There was a file here that showed it was X date, but that can't possibly be true" or "Sometimes the paper spreads misinformation" etc.
I'll make note of everything she mentions in my findings.
Doesn't that mean our whole timeline is broken and we can't use any onscreen dates at this point?Oh that's much better, I like that. Can't wait to get this book tomorrow
Slyonic seems to be saying she points out which dates can't be used. I'm sure it's ones that the site has ignored anyway. Plus it isn't like we would not have the general placement to compare with here anyway.Doesn't that mean our whole timeline is broken and we can't use any onscreen dates at this point?
I don't see how that's better...
I haven't seen anything that would say the book is "off". Either way it's Marvel Studios intended timeline, whether one agrees or doesn't.I agree with selfishmisery on this, the book seems a bit off... and some timeliners are ignoring It (the Wiki for example).
I don't see how this bit of information changes anything really. We don't even use every on screen date seen here because some clearly can't work. I think acting like every onscreen date seen can be used is as ridiculous as saying no onscreen dates can be useI agree with selfishmisery on this, the book seems a bit off... and some timeliners are ignoring It (the Wiki for example).
Where did the Wiki people state that?I agree with selfishmisery on this, the book seems a bit off... and some timeliners are ignoring It (the Wiki for example).
What you Mean ignoring the book?Where did the Wiki people state that?
I'm sure it's because they need time to make the changes.What you Mean ignoring the book?
Well they still set Iron Man 1 in 2009, and Iron Man 3 in 2012, if this Isn't ignoring the book, IDK What Is.
If she doesn't that'd be a massive missed opportunityDoes Miss Minutes say to ignore "8 Years Later…"?
If the book is including something like this, it'd be extremely disappointing if she didn't.Does Miss Minutes say to ignore "8 Years Later…"?