Dallas Kinard
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 8, 2016
- Messages
- 1,757
What if the post credits scene shows her in the spider web chair with grey hair? That'd be cool.
Look at 0:07. Matches pregnant Emma Robert's clothing from set photos, and there's balloons everywhere. Possibly a baby shower?
View attachment 1464


I see it as a domino effect of incursions, starting with one, leading to another, so on and so forth. My guess is the collider was the catalyst, MCU Dr Strange made it worse, and it will reach its peak with the Council of Kangs.I think, since the sky had changed like in No Way Home, it was created by those events, not Spider-Verse. However, I do think there's a loose connection that can be made.
Miguel mentioned that due to the collider incident, many people are being accidentally sent to other universes. Earth-199999 Doctor Strange and Spider-Man may have further ruined the condition, hence why Vulture was transported to this universe.
I mean, it'd be the cleanest if TASM was part of this universe, and I have no problem with that either, but it's not official. Maybe if this Madame Web leak pans out they'll connect the two eventually.If this rumor holds any weight, my assumption that the SSU is the Amazing Spider-Man universe (wrongly labeled as Earth-688 in Spider-Verse) was right.
Like Pro said earlier, making Madame Web part of TASM universe would be a good thing. Alas, this is Sony we're talking about.
I'm beginning to think they can't use Peter Parker at this point because of Marvel Studios forbidding it so they can't really tie it to any continuity - but they wanna keep the rights.Like Pro said earlier, making Madame Web part of TASM universe would be a good thing. Alas, this is Sony we're talking about.
If that's the case, then WHAT is the point of this whole Spider-Man Cinematic Universe that doesn't, you know, HAVE SPIDER-MAN in it?! You know, the character your universe is named after?I'm beginning to think they can't use Peter Parker at this point because of Marvel Studios forbidding it so they can't really tie it to any continuity - but they wanna keep the rights.
And same.At this point, I don't care if they introduce a Tom Holland variant. It'd be better than nothing.
Apparently they didn't even say this. Another example of checking the source.If I recall correctly, their Multiverse of Madness leaks were nonsense. Sounds like they're saying what they think people want to hear, which is probably that Sony is trash and can't decide on what they want to do with Spider-Man.
If it was true, Sony could have easily just removed references to any specific year instead of removing the pretty huge Peter Parker side-plot.
But who knows, maybe they got this one right. We'll find out soon.
Apparently they didn't even say this. Another example of checking the source.
They said it was just a rumour that they're removing all references to it being in the 1990s in the latest reshoots (so, a "rumour"... and it was never set in the 1990s, it was the 2000s), and they never mentioned that Spider-Man stuff was being removed at all. That was fabrication that came from... reddit.![]()