Timeline Hub

The Comic Board - Collecting, Buy, Sell, Trade & Comic News, Reviews & Discussion

Help Support The Comic Board:

Megatron said:
AN ORDER FOR ALL THE EPISODES
Click to expand...
I extensively tried looking for one of these, so I could add it to my Slasherverse (movie/TV only, sorry!) and I found quite a few websites on it, though all with conflicting orders. I think does just alternate between the 2 shows, though every time some episodes follow on from another you'd do those one after the other, without a Hercules episode in between (or vice versa). I honestly didn't even know there were 1940s episodes, so I've no clue where they'd go, sorry.

Ask @BMarrow I think he added the shows, comics and animated movie to his Slasherverse (I presume this was based on some sort of premise)
 
Pro Bot said:
I doubt it'll get a timeline (soon), but, well, it's a somewhat interesting series. I'm sure I'm not the only one who saw that trailer featuring Ant-Man and Steve.

1997 - Anaconda (1997)
1999 - Lake Placid
2004 - Anacondas: The Hunt for the Blood Orchid
2007 - Lake Placid 2
2008 - Anaconda 3: Offspring
2009 - Anacondas: Trail of Blood
2010 - Lake Placid 3
2012 - Lake Placid: The Final Chapter
2014 - Anaconda: The Writer's Cut
2015 - Lake Placid vs. Anaconda
2018 - Lake Placid: Legacy
2024 - Anaconda: Cursed Jungle
2025 - Anaconda (2025)
Click to expand...
Having seen all these films now (which... was quite a choice), they are actually very lore consistent with each other. Lake Placid: Legacy is NOT a reboot like wikipedia says. It's a sequel set in a new location that explains where the crocodiles came from. A character is mentioned to have taken the crocodiles to Lake Placid (Black Lake), Maine 25 years ago, which would be 1993. That's 6 years before Lake Placid takes place. It's clearly in the same continuity.

The chinese-language instalment, Anaconda: Cursed Jungle, is not a remake either. I can accept the term reboot, but it isn't really like the first film at all. It doesn't contradict anything, so throwing it in the same timeline makes perfect sense. Actually, they're all extremely lore consistent considering half of them are Syfy films. I appreciate that.
 
Pro Bot said:
Having seen all these films now (which... was quite a choice), they are actually very lore consistent with each other. Lake Placid: Legacy is NOT a reboot like wikipedia says. It's a sequel set in a new location that explains where the crocodiles came from. A character is mentioned to have taken the crocodiles to Lake Placid (Black Lake), Maine 25 years ago, which would be 1993. That's 6 years before Lake Placid takes place. It's clearly in the same continuity.

The chinese-language instalment, Anaconda: Cursed Jungle, is not a remake either. I can accept the term reboot, but it isn't really like the first film at all. It doesn't contradict anything, so throwing it in the same timeline makes perfect sense. Actually, they're all extremely lore consistent considering half of them are Syfy films. I appreciate that.
Click to expand...
Cursed Jungle quite literally expands on what we knew about anacondas from previous instalments. (And obviously that big ass snake at the end XD)
 
Pro Bot said:
Having seen all these films now (which... was quite a choice), they are actually very lore consistent with each other. Lake Placid: Legacy is NOT a reboot like wikipedia says. It's a sequel set in a new location that explains where the crocodiles came from. A character is mentioned to have taken the crocodiles to Lake Placid (Black Lake), Maine 25 years ago, which would be 1993. That's 6 years before Lake Placid takes place. It's clearly in the same continuity.

The chinese-language instalment, Anaconda: Cursed Jungle, is not a remake either. I can accept the term reboot, but it isn't really like the first film at all. It doesn't contradict anything, so throwing it in the same timeline makes perfect sense. Actually, they're all extremely lore consistent considering half of them are Syfy films. I appreciate that.
Click to expand...
I love that the new Anaconda is so inline with every previous film and the novel like wow. altho you technically can interpret the film 2 ways...
 
Maciej Jankowski said:
I love that the new Anaconda is so inline with every previous film and the novel like wow. altho you technically can interpret the film 2 ways...
Click to expand...
Basically, there's an in-universe movie called Anaconda in the 2025 film that stars serveral actors that were in the 1997 film. Since we never see any footage of it and the characters that those actors played aren't named, you can easily say that the new instalment is the twelve film in the original Anaconda universe (six Anaconda films, five Lake Placid films, and Lake Placid vs. Anaconda) rather than essentially the Anaconda version of Wes Caven's New Nightmare.

Think Scream and Stab... or A Nightmare on Elm Street being a canon film in Freddy's Nightmares.
 
I recall us discussing the Friday the 13th 2009 film as being in the same continuity as the original based on statements by the writers and producers (thus... Transformers is Slasherverse, I guess?). Well, what other franchises are there where this is the case?

Texas Chainsaw Massacre, obviously. The Hewitts and the Sawyers are different people, so they can exist in the same universe. The similarities can be chalked up to the Illuminati's plan to spread fear.

Child's Play (2019) was referenced in the TV show briefly, so it could be the same universe despite a few characters sharing the same name. It's harder to fit, though.

I honestly didn't think to check this, but Black Christmas (2006) and Black Christmas (2019) don't really contradict the 1974 film. "Billy" in the 1974 film is actually supposedly Kent Kingsley after the events of The Toolbox Murders. If he's a different character, then Billy Lenz could just be an unrelated character with a similar MO. It's weird that they both moan about this Agnes person, though. Other than Billy, none of the characters from the original film are "remade". As for the latest film... completely new characters.
 
Maybe for the 2019 Child's Play film, it's probably a similar situation with Nosferatu 1922 and 2024 happening and sharing the same universe even though characters share the same names
 
iceman109 said:
Maybe for the 2019 Child's Play film, it's probably a similar situation with Nosferatu 1922 and 2024 happening and sharing the same universe even though characters share the same names
Click to expand...
Technically, the original Nosferatu is only connected by a UM-branded short film. You're correct, but I think that was an accident.
 
Last edited:
Pro Bot said:
I recall us discussing the Friday the 13th 2009 film as being in the same continuity as the original based on statements by the writers and producers (thus... Transformers is Slasherverse, I guess?). Well, what other franchises are there where this is the case?

Texas Chainsaw Massacre, obviously. The Hewitts and the Sawyers are different people, so they can exist in the same universe. The similarities can be chalked up to the Illuminati's plan to spread fear.

Child's Play (2019) was referenced in the TV show briefly, so it could be the same universe despite a few characters sharing the same name. It's harder to fit, though.

I honestly didn't think to check this, but Black Christmas (2006) and Black Christmas (2019) don't really contradict the 1974 film. "Billy" in the 1974 film is actually supposedly Kent Kingsley after the events of The Toolbox Murders. If he's a different character, then Billy Lenz could just be an unrelated character with a similar MO. It's weird that they both moan about this Agnes person, though. Other than Billy, none of the characters from the original film are "remade". As for the latest film... completely new characters.
Click to expand...
Oh, Leprechaun: Origins too. That ****** film doesn't even feature Leprechauns. I remember doing research on it. It's literally completely unrelated except for being in the same franchise... which actually works in its favour towards being canon, ironically.
 
Isn't their a Hawaii Five 0 (remake) episode that's also kind of a sequel to an episode from the original show with the art thief
 
Pro Bot said:
I recall us discussing the Friday the 13th 2009 film as being in the same continuity as the original based on statements by the writers and producers (thus... Transformers is Slasherverse, I guess?). Well, what other franchises are there where this is the case?
Click to expand...
Charlie's Angels, 1976, 2000 and 2019
The Karate Kid, 1984 and 2010
21 Jump Street, 1987 and 2012
The Grudge, 2004 and 2019
 
Pro Bot said:
I honestly didn't think to check this, but Black Christmas (2006) and Black Christmas (2019) don't really contradict the 1974 film. "Billy" in the 1974 film is actually supposedly Kent Kingsley after the events of The Toolbox Murders. If he's a different character, then Billy Lenz could just be an unrelated character with a similar MO. It's weird that they both moan about this Agnes person, though. Other than Billy, none of the characters from the original film are "remade". As for the latest film... completely new characters.
Click to expand...
Yeah, but let's be real, the 2019 movie is completely unwatchable ******* that is also Black Christmas in-name-only. Doesn't help that they focused on political messaging first over actually delivering a good story.
 
JudgeDreddpool said:
Yeah, but let's be real, the 2019 movie is completely unwatchable ******* that is also Black Christmas in-name-only. Doesn't help that they focused on political messaging first over actually delivering a good story.
Click to expand...
I mean, hey. I'm just the messenger. It's part of the franchise and not a remake... it could be the same continuity.
 
barryh said:
Charlie's Angels, 1976, 2000 and 2019
The Karate Kid, 1984 and 2010
21 Jump Street, 1987 and 2012
The Grudge, 2004 and 2019
Click to expand...
Charlie's Angels were always made to be in the same continuity as well as Jump Street and The Grudge, it's more of Evil Dead situation not reboot that can fit tbf
 
Pro Bot said:
I mean, hey. I'm just the messenger. It's part of the franchise and not a remake... it could be the same continuity.
Click to expand...
Frankly, I just flat out refuse to accept it as a Black Christmas movie, or even as a good movie in general.
myusernameyes said:
Best. Movie. Ever. From description that is.
Click to expand...
No offense, but if this isn't satire...
doakes-dexter.gif
 
Anyways, not gonna start an arguement over a ******* movie (especially one that is less progressive than the "original" it's an in-name only remake of) when I'm not in the best mood.
 
Also, the 2019 version of Black Christmas could technically be set in the Universal Monsters Universe due to being distributed by Universal (does being distributed count)?
 
Chronologie complète – Crocodile Dundee
1986 – Crocodile Dundee (film, canon)
1988 – Crocodile Dundee II (film, canon)
Années 1980-1990 – Publicités touristiques australiennes mettant en vedette Mick Dundee / Paul Hogan
Années 1990 – Saturday Night Live (parodies directes)
Années 1990-2000 – Les Simpson (références directes)
2001 – Crocodile Dundee à Los Angeles (film, canon)
Années 2000 – Les Griffin (parodies)
Années 2000 – South Park (parodies)
Années 2000-2010 – Shrek, Madagascar (clins d'œil indirects)
2018 – Dundee : Le fils d'une légende revient chez lui (Publicité du Super Bowl, apparition de Paul Hogan)
 
Jamesctl said:
Chronologie complète – Crocodile Dundee
1986 – Crocodile Dundee (film, canon)
1988 – Crocodile Dundee II (film, canon)
Années 1980-1990 – Publicités touristiques australiennes mettant en vedette Mick Dundee / Paul Hogan
Années 1990 – Saturday Night Live (parodies directes)
Années 1990-2000 – Les Simpson (références directes)
2001 – Crocodile Dundee à Los Angeles (film, canon)
Années 2000 – Les Griffin (parodies)
Années 2000 – South Park (parodies)
Années 2000-2010 – Shrek, Madagascar (clins d'œil indirects)
2018 – Dundee : Le fils d'une légende revient chez lui (Publicité du Super Bowl, apparition de Paul Hogan)
Click to expand...
How does Madagascar, of all things, connect???
 
stphylcccs said:
Quel est le lien avec Madagascar, de toutes les choses possibles ???
Click to expand...
Les Simpson – références directes (gam du couteau, accent)

Les gags verbaux de Family Guy

South Park – Caricature australienne

Saturday Night Live – sketches parodiques

Shrek – inspiration indirecte

Madagascar – archétype de l'explorateur
 
Universal Monsters isn't just "horror movie by Universal", it's specifically IPs like Dracula, Frankenstein, The Mummy, Creature, etc. distributed by Universal. If it's not one of those, the connection needs to be proven by some sort of source, like The Thing video game being advertised as Universal Monsters in a magazine.

By that logic, Jurassic Park would be the same universe. That's just silly.
 
Pro Bot said:
By that logic, Jurassic Park would be the same universe. That's just silly.
Click to expand...
Ironically, if you take the Howling references in the Slasherverse as canon, and the Piranha remakes as being in the same canon as the original (I don't think there's any contradictions) then Jurassic Park could be canon to the Slasherverse.

Massive stretch, of course, and the line of connections most likely ends at the original Piranha movies, but still
 
https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Trivia/Firefly
"Joss Whedon gave an interview around the time Serenity came out, where he stated that, had the show lasted multiple seasons, he had an idea to include a cameo by Spike sometime around Season 6, retroactively incorporating Firefly into the Buffyverse. The scene would involved Mal encountering Spike in a bar on one of the border planets, where the British Vampire would resignedly tell him "Nothing ever changes"."

This would have been both fun and sad.

But even the fact that Whedon thought about it, makes the Slayer Theory in a more real position than before.

P.S. The grammatical errors you can see between the "" aren't done by me, I've just copy pasted it.

anyways from what I see, it's a reverse situation of EMH - W&X-MEN - SSM.

The difference is that they were meant to be separate, but then they were made together, here they were meant to be canon, but they never had the opportunity to show it and never said otherwise. So I mean, I can see a Buffy/Angel/Firefly/Serenity universe.

You could prolbably add Dollhouse too, but there wasn't a single confirmation about that ever.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

JudgeDreddpool
Marvel Multiverse Hub
6 7 8
Replies
222
Views
10K
selfishmisery
selfishmisery
B
Marvel Cinematic Multiverse Timeline
Replies
4
Views
488
Beamy11845
B
Megatron
Sunbow Universe - Timeline
Replies
5
Views
998
user 16960
U
stphylcccs
Undertale AU/AT Multiverse timeline
Replies
0
Views
724
stphylcccs
stphylcccs
Pro Bot
Men in Black - Timeline
Replies
16
Views
412
Pro Bot
Pro Bot

Latest posts

Back
Top