X-Men Cinematic Universe - Timeline (Revised & Original)

[barryh]

 

[BB10]

I don't hate Barakapool. It is understandable why a lot of people hated him back in the day since he was the only live action version of Deadpool. There were no other options. But nowadays, it can simply be seen as a parallel universe version of Deadpool.

 

[BB10]

In the Origins after credits, Barakapool was seen with his mouth open again and breaking the fourth wall, seemingly implying he was going to become more of a classic Deadpool eventually.

I don't know when the test footage below was made but maybe one could say Barakapool eventually become the Deadpool seen in it.



Just a theory though.

 

[myusernameyes]

In the Origins after credits, Barakapool was seen with his mouth open again and breaking the fourth wall, seemingly implying he was going to become more of a classic Deadpool eventually.

I don't know when the test footage below was made but maybe one could say Barakapool eventually become the Deadpool seen in it.



Just a theory though.

These two are much different in origin, not to mention that the first Deadpool was born near the 1940s and took part in the Vietnam War, while the second one had nothing to do with that

 

[Pro Bot]

These two are much different in origin, not to mention that the first Deadpool was born near the 1940s and took part in the Vietnam War, while the second one had nothing to do with that

We don't know anything about Test Footage Deadpool's origin, so how do you know he didn't take part in the vietnam war?

 

[SoyaCS]

We don't know anything about Test Footage Deadpool's origin, so how do you know he didn't take part in the vietnam war?

Is test footage Deadpool a variant?

 

[Pro Bot]

Is test footage Deadpool a variant?

He's non-existent as far as canon goes, but my point is that you can't really disprove that Weapon XI didn't become a classic Deadpool after XMOW.

 

[woodlark_289]

 

[BB10]

These two are much different in origin, not to mention that the first Deadpool was born near the 1940s and took part in the Vietnam War, while the second one had nothing to do with that

The test footage doesn't reveal anything about DP's backstory. Plus if that test footage was made before they decided to reboot the timeline, he would have been the same guy as Origins DP.

 

[myusernameyes]

Well in that case Wade is currently in his 80s as far as timeline is concerned lol

 

[Pro Bot]

Deadpool is immortal.

 

[woodlark_289]

 

[UltimateWhovian7]

Just doing a little check-in. What evidence was there for X1 and X2 being in 2003/4?

 

[selfishmisery]

Just doing a little check-in. What evidence was there for X1 and X2 being in 2003/4?

I am going off the X-Men Movies Wiki timeline because I couldn't find a date.

 

[Pro Bot]

I think there's a TV early in X2 that has something like a ??/??/2014 (yes, 14) on it, but I don't know if that was a date or not. Probably not.

 

[selfishmisery]

I think there's a TV early in X2 that has something like a ??/??/2014 (yes, 14) on it, but I don't know if that was a date or not. Probably not.

https://xmenmovies.fandom.com/wiki/Talk:2000s
The Last Stand is in 2006 also because of the 25 Moments DOFP viral marketing.

 

[selfishmisery]

I think there's a TV early in X2 that has something like a ??/??/2014 (yes, 14) on it, but I don't know if that was a date or not. Probably not.

I cant double check on Disney+ because I am broke and my subscription payment was declined, however.

 

[Pro Bot]

https://xmenmovies.fandom.com/wiki/Talk:2000s
The Last Stand is in 2006 also because of the 25 Moments DOFP viral marketing.

I know. You'd exhange 2014 for 2004 if it were a legitimate date.

 

[Pro Bot]

Just doing a little check-in. What evidence was there for X1 and X2 being in 2003/4?

X2 released in 2003, X-Men is set in the near future, the tie-in comics and films suggest not a lot of time passed.

 

[UltimateWhovian7]

X2 released in 2003, X-Men is set in the near future, the tie-in comics and films suggest not a lot of time passed.

That's about as much to go off I suppose, are there any other films that claim to be the near future?

 

[selfishmisery]

I think there's a TV early in X2 that has something like a ??/??/2014 (yes, 14) on it, but I don't know if that was a date or not. Probably not.

Got paid. Rewatched it and it reads:
LCB 05:22 (stocks down symbol) .14

That is not a date, that is stock market mumbo jumbo.

 

[selfishmisery]

When Bobby's younger brother calls the cops on him and Logan, the camera pans into his room and there is a poster for an obscure IRL band from the late-90s/early-2000s called Operation Makeout - with the date "Saturday, June 1st".

That is compatable with 2002.

 

[selfishmisery]

When Bobby's younger brother calls the cops on him and Logan, the camera pans into his room and there is a poster for an obscure IRL band from the late-90s/early-2000s called Operation Makeout - with the date "Saturday, June 1st".

That is compatable with 2002.

Based on this, the fact I have seen similar posters in Superman & Lois in the sons' rooms that stuck around after a year, the short amount of time that has to occur between now and The Last Stand - lets go with 2003.

 

[selfishmisery]

Supposedly X-Men: The Last Stand was intended to take place months after X2.
https://assets.scriptslug.com/live/pdf/scripts/x-men-the-last-stand-2006.pdf
The fact that Cyclops' grief over Jean Grey still seems recent and first two films have no objective year assigned to them...let's go with 2006.

 

[UltimateWhovian7]

I always thought that it seems far too long since the last film. It would then mean the "events" of Origins now happened in 1991, going off of the "15 years" lines. I've always been in the belief that X-Men: Origins - Wolverine didn't actually happen as we saw it but it's how Logan believes it happened. Hence Scott, Charles, Emma Frost (it's Silverfox but that a retcon), Quicksilver, Psylocke all appearing in ways that seem to contradict.

 

[UltimateWhovian7]

Supposedly X-Men: The Last Stand was intended to take place months after X2.
https://assets.scriptslug.com/live/pdf/scripts/x-men-the-last-stand-2006.pdf
The fact that Cyclops' grief over Jean Grey still seems recent and first two films have no objective year assigned to them...let's go with 2006.

Where did you find this btw? Is this official or fan-made?

 

[woodlark_289]

I always thought that it seems far too long since the last film. It would then mean the "events" of Origins now happened in 1991, going off of the "15 years" lines.

oh yea so wouldnt this imply a 1994 date for x2? if only he'd said 25 years… or maybe they had another brief encounter around 1989?

 

[UltimateWhovian7]

oh yea so wouldnt this imply a 1994 date for x2? if only he'd said 25 years… or maybe they had another brief encounter in 1989?

1994 would work because the Twin Towers are still standing in X1. However we know for a fact that X3 is 2006 and the ages for the characters wouldn't line up otherwise. They double down and say 15 years since Weapon X in X2 as well. Was it officially confirmed that Origins is 1979. I know that it seemingly adapts the Three Mile Island Crisis but was that officially dubbed anywhere?

 

[Pro Bot]

I always assumed that, for reconciliation purposes, Wolverine was recaptured after X-Men Origins: Wolverine and that's when the flashbacks from X2 happen. A second adamantium coating for the bullet hold in his skull, hence why it doesn't appear on the x-ray in the first film. Days of Future Past has flashbacks to both XMOW and X2's flashbacks.

 

[woodlark_289]

I always assumed that, for reconciliation purposes, Wolverine was recaptured after X-Men Origins: Wolverine and that's when the flashbacks from X2 happen. A second adamantium coating for the bullet hold in his skull, hence why it doesn't appear on the x-ray in the first film. Days of Future Past has flashbacks to both XMOW and X2's flashbacks.

interesting…