Marvel Cinematic Universe News, Rumors, and Discussion

The Comic Board - Collecting, Buy, Sell, Trade & Comic News, Reviews & Discussion

Help Support The Comic Board:

At first I wasn't sure how much of this to believe, but after thinking about it it does fit in with a lot of rumors out there (Marvel trying to get a deal with Sony to use Spider-man, Chris Evans talking about life after Captain America, Captain America reportedly * SPOILER *). I wonder how this, if true, will affect what a lot of people assumed about the future of Marvel films. Specifically, would Avengers 3 still focus on Thanos and the Infinity Gauntlet? It seems clear that Marvel wants Thanos to serve as a big bad, but perhaps they want to keep him for the more galactic GOTG films. Who knows, I'm just speculating here. I also wonder if this means that * SPOILER *

If this news holds true of them adapting the Civil War storyline into the MCU, I don't necessarily think that means Avengers 3 won't feature Thanos and the Infinity Gauntlet storyline. If they adapt Civil War as the basis for Cap 3, Avengers 3 can very well still focus on Thanos and the Gauntlet. We'll see.
 
They are adapting civil war. I think it'll start in cap 3 BUT there will be a Civil war movie after it builds. Civil war comic was a great concept but very poorly done from like the half way point (clone thor and spider-man unmasking were STUPID and how can you "choose a side" when iron man acted like a villain as his side did. Make them both good as both sides had merits) hopefully the film does it right.
 
Wow. That's so cool.

I really doubt Marvel will bring Spider-Man into it though. I don't even know how they would bring the two universes together.
 
Wow. That's so cool. I really doubt Marvel will bring Spider-Man into it though. I don't even know how they would bring the two universes together.

Well, they could go the alternate universe route and somehow have Peter Parker transported to the MCU.

They could even make it the same universe, and explain away all those construction rigs that Spider-Man used to swing on to get to Oscorp tower as being there to rebuild a certain part of the city after the Chitauri battle in Avengers. It would feel a bit forced, since you'd think a massive alien invasion would be mentioned at some point, but it could work, I guess.

And it would be stunningly cool to see Spider-Man interacting with and helping the Avengers. The banter from him aimed at the other Avengers characters in a first meeting would be hilarious.

From a business standpoint, after ASM2's box office falling short of projection, it would make perfect sense for both studios. Marvel obviously would love to have Spidey's rights back, but I do think they'd be willing to settle for working with Sony to combine the franchises. And Sony most definitely would be onboard, since Spidey crossing over into the MCU would most likely give their ailing Spider-Man franchise a huge boost in the arm in terms of fan interest and box office returns for future Amazing Spider-Man sequels and the various spinoffs they have planned (Sinister Six, Venom).

I've read that Sony has been having financial trouble and may look into selling off properties they have the film rights to, so they may be in a financial position where such a crossover would help them greatly (since I doubt they'll sell off the Spidy franchise to Marvel due to it being one of the franchises they own with the most promise in terms of economic gain).
 
Last edited:
#7 isn't correct. There's been plenty of new mutants created, even in the current Uncanny X-Men arc that started a couple months ago. And "No More Mutants" is an Avengers story arc, with no information about it, but rumored to be connected/spinning off from AXIS, so possibly some alternate something going on.
 
#7 isn't correct. There's been plenty of new mutants created, even in the current Uncanny X-Men arc that started a couple months ago. And "No More Mutants" is an Avengers story arc, with no information about it, but rumored to be connected/spinning off from AXIS, so possibly some alternate something going on.

Yeah, but there may be no new mutants created from here on out. Presuming the comics currently coming out were written, approved by editorial, and had the artwork, coloring, and lettering done probably several months back or more (at least since the scripts were approved), the current issues may not reflect that dictate yet. I'm not saying the article is 100% accurate, just that that aspect may play into the whole scheme. If six months down the road new mutant characters are showing up, we'll know it's not the case.
 
Yeah, but there may be no new mutants created from here on out. Presuming the comics currently coming out were written, approved by editorial, and had the artwork, coloring, and lettering done probably several months back or more (at least since the scripts were approved), the current issues may not reflect that dictate yet. I'm not saying the article is 100% accurate, just that that aspect may play into the whole scheme. If six months down the road new mutant characters are showing up, we'll know it's not the case.
But that's something that Chris Claremont has stated himself just the other week that that was a mandate given to creators at the beginning of the year or earlier. Even he himself created a new mutant within the just started Nightcrawler series he's currently writing.
 
Is that also why spider-man keeps getting treated like crap? I mentioned this is in my comic Zone video but since marvel did movies Iron man became the face of marvel and spider-man? Spiderman got his continuity erased in new day , the superior stuff and more its like they made it so people can't like spider-man anymore. Even the ultimate cartoon feels dumb. Hopefully if they do agree with sony to use him he'll stop been treated like a ginger step-child.

Also killing wolverine arguably the most popular xmen character.
 
Is that also why spider-man keeps getting treated like crap? I mentioned this is in my comic Zone video but since marvel did movies Iron man became the face of marvel and spider-man? Spiderman got his continuity erased in new day , the superior stuff and more its like they made it so people can't like spider-man anymore. Even the ultimate cartoon feels dumb. Hopefully if they do agree with sony to use him he'll stop been treated like a ginger step-child.

Also killing wolverine arguably the most popular xmen character.
Spider-Man did not get his continuity erased in One More Day, which I believe is what you mean. Everything that happened with Spider-Man after he was initially married to Mary Jane still happened, just with him and MJ as a couple or whatever, to a point where they eventually broke up.

They didn't make anything with Superior so people wouldn't like it. No one does anything like that on purpose. And in fact, Superior Spider-Man was a big success for Marvel and made that 'version' of Spider-Man quite popular. Some things that were done with him were really quite smart and ingenious.

The Ultimate Spider-Man cartoon may feel dumb to you, but what do you expect when they are purposely making the cartoon for little kids? Of course something like that will feel dumb to adults.


If Marvel and Sony actually do work out a deal, he'll be treated just fine in the MCU. Whatever happens behind the scenes, Marvel still does great work with the characters and the movies.
 
Well, they could go the alternate universe route and somehow have Peter Parker transported to the MCU.

They could even make it the same universe, and explain away all those construction rigs that Spider-Man used to swing on to get to Oscorp tower as being there to rebuild a certain part of the city after the Chitauri battle in Avengers. It would feel a bit forced, since you'd think a massive alien invasion would be mentioned at some point, but it could work, I guess.

And it would be stunningly cool to see Spider-Man interacting with and helping the Avengers. The banter from him aimed at the other Avengers characters in a first meeting would be hilarious.

From a business standpoint, after ASM2's box office falling short of projection, it would make perfect sense for both studios. Marvel obviously would love to have Spidey's rights back, but I do think they'd be willing to settle for working with Sony to combine the franchises. And Sony most definitely would be onboard, since Spidey crossing over into the MCU would most likely give their ailing Spider-Man franchise a huge boost in the arm in terms of fan interest and box office returns for future Amazing Spider-Man sequels and the various spinoffs they have planned (Sinister Six, Venom).

I've read that Sony has been having financial trouble and may look into selling off properties they have the film rights to, so they may be in a financial position where such a crossover would help them greatly (since I doubt they'll sell off the Spidy franchise to Marvel due to it being one of the franchises they own with the most promise in terms of economic gain).

I wouldn't mind if they introduced Spider-Man into the MCU and left it nebulous if it was related to the ongoing stuff at Sony. I know that's not what they'll do, but after ASM2, I just don't want that to be part of the MCU.
 
There's a one-shot script for Sin (Red Skull's daughter) written that hasn't been made. [Click on #8] "Sin’s an interesting character that the big-wigs at Marvel have shown some additional interest as of rest, with Iron Man 3 writer Drew Pearce stating he wrote a script for a Marvel One-Shot featuring Sin that hasn’t been made."

Interesting.

I wonder if they're going to start making the One Shots again. I enjoyed them.
 
Event still going on, here's the big news dropped so far:

Doctor Strange: November 4th, 2016

Guardians of the Galaxy 2: May 5th, 2017

Thor: Ragnarok: July 28th, 2017

Black Panther: November 3rd, 2017

Captain Marvel: July 6, 2018

Inhumans: November 2nd, 2018

Avengers: Infinity War Part 1: May 4th, 2018

Avengers: Infinity War Part 2: May 5th, 2019

Captain America: Civil War: May 6th, 2016

*Chadwick Boseman officially Black Panther
 
Last edited:
Phase three is looking good

May 6th, 2016 - Captain America: Civil War
July 8th, 2016 - Doctor Strange
May 5th, 2017 - Untitled Guardians of the Galaxy Sequel
July 28th, 2017 - Thor: Ragnarok
November 3, 2017 - Black Panther
May 4, 2018 - The Avengers: Infinity War Part 1
July 6th, 2018 - Captain Marvel
November 2, 2018 - Inhumans
May 3, 2019 - The Avengers: Infinity War Part 2

Chadwick Boseman is playing Black Panther

1600_phpbad0ltbpconcept_finalsized.jpg


Two films between the Avengers films. Kree must be involved. They have to be.
 
Last edited:
Cool! Obviously only going by the titles, of course, but these sound interesting.

Specifically RAGNAROK and INFINITY WAR.
 
Black Panther will make his debut (in costume) in Captain America: Civil War.

Kevin Fiege says Civil War is the start of Phase 3.
 
Last edited:
a Female superhero and team movie = Parts 1 + 2. Looks like Marvel are took things from DC's plan (just pointing it out as everyones fast to say when dc take marvel stuff)
 
a Female superhero and team movie = Parts 1 + 2. Looks like Marvel are took things from DC's plan (just pointing it out as everyones fast to say when dc take marvel stuff)
Not at all. This was always Marvel's plans. WB (not so much DC) has only recently been scrapping plans together.
 
Not at all. This was always Marvel's plans. WB (not so much DC) has only recently been scrapping plans together.

Oh i know the universe was. But when asked last year if there would be a Black widow film they said no as they didn't a female lead in comic movie would sell. It just seems kinda funny that they announced that + the 2 parter after DC did

That said i think both will be fun for fans of either.
 
Oh i know the universe was. But when asked last year if there would be a Black widow film they said no as they didn't a female lead in comic movie would sell. It just seems kinda funny that they announced that + the 2 parter after DC did

That said i think both will be fun for fans of either.
I meant the plans they had for Captain Marvel and all.

I've never seen them say a female comic lead movie wouldn't do well or anything. Link? Source?
 
There were rumors of Avengers being split before DC announced a split Justice League. I also just realized Civil War's marketing is going to be GIANT
 
Last edited:
one example :

I think [Black Widow] has a central leading role in [Captain America: The Winter Soldier]. What people are really saying is "When are you doing a standalone female superhero movie?" The answer is: I don't know. We only do two a year, we know more or less what's coming up through '16/'17. With Widow what's great is the interaction with all the team members, and the question is whether we want to pluck her out of that.

Just 7 months ago http://screenrant.com/ms-marvel-black-widow-movie/

Then DC announced Wonder woman and ... yeah. It's good thing though that they are but DC announced a trailer for Batman/superman and people on websites were like "lol they are just coping marvel's avengers 2 trailer" i was just pointing out its a 2 way street. Based on the nature of comics both will copy both (as they have similar audiences so they judge what should work ect...)


There were rumors of Avengers being split before DC announced a split Justice League.

There was rumours of Batman/Superman team up movie years before any of the avengers films (hell poster is in "I am Legend") But all people respond to is which got officially announced first
 
Last edited:

Latest posts

Back
Top