Marvel Cinematic Universe - Timeline

The Comic Board - Collecting, Buy, Sell, Trade & Comic News, Reviews & Discussion

Help Support The Comic Board:

[video=youtube;4_Wou74TE7A]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4_Wou74TE7A[/video]

Overlaps with the opening of Civil War. Minor spoilers.
 
Added^. Its mentioned in Civil War that the attack in Lagos occurred a month ago/last month (so there must be a jump of a month between Lagos events and the fallout/rest of film).

Also, Captain America - Civil War definitely cemented the timeline, most notably the confusion over the placement of first Iron Man in 2008 or 2011. Its now confirmed as occurring 8 years before Civil War (so 2008 and 2016). Its also mentioned its been 3 years that the Avengers have operated without any oversight, referencing the fall of SHIELD in CA-Winter Soldier in 2013. Also, Ross mentions he had a heart attack and retired from military 5 years ago. This perfectly lines up with him likely having heart attack soon after events of Incredible Hulk/Battle of Harlem/his failure to capture Hulk in 2011 (also he'd had a major failure previous to that due to events of Iron Man 2 - Public Identity comics). He says it happened on golf course in middle of backswing, but perhaps it was a stress-related heart attack from his failures in those incidents. Either way, it reinforces the idea of Incredible Hulk occurring in 2011 (along with Fury's Big Week comics).

Civil War was like a nice band-aid on the one major MCU continuity hiccup relating to the first Iron Man movie's placement, and a confirmation of the other placements. ;)

I love it when a timeline comes together.
 
Last edited:
Oh, hey, I didn't catch the three years ago reference to TWS, that's neat. When was that?

It was pointed out to me, though, that there are a couple of lines in IM2 that make the "six months after Vanko finished his suit" workaround a little iffy - Hammer talks about Tony having been Iron Manning "for the past six months" during the senate hearing, whilst Christine Everhart "did quite a spread on Tony last year."
 
Oh, hey, I didn't catch the three years ago reference to TWS, that's neat. When was that?

During Ross' first meeting with the Avengers after the Lagos incident.

It was pointed out to me, though, that there are a couple of lines in IM2 that make the "six months after Vanko finished his suit" workaround a little iffy - Hammer talks about Tony having been Iron Manning "for the past six months" during the senate hearing, whilst Christine Everhart "did quite a spread on Tony last year."

Yeah its not perfect, but we can just assume those are cases of generalities maybe with the Everhart thing.

Also, "six months after Vanko finished his suit" still works, especially if we correctly account for Vanko taking a couple years for him to build suit in first place, which is how the timeline account for it: Vanko discovers blueprints after his father's death immediately after end of first Iron Man, he works on it over rest of 2008 and during 2009 and 2010-2011 (the opening of Iron Man 2, presuming it progresses through the montage scene at beginning of Iron Man 2 from 2008 - 2011).
 
I did post this on the timeline site, but figured I'd post it here too.

Parker has been Spider-Man for six months (After the one month jump) so, taking into account the references to him in Ant-Man. Assuming he first started being Spider-Man in October, it would set the movie in March/April.
 
I did post this on the timeline site, but figured I'd post it here too.

Parker has been Spider-Man for six months (After the one month jump) so, taking into account the references to him in Ant-Man. Assuming he first started being Spider-Man in October, it would set the movie in March/April.

Yup.

Also, keep in mind the technology Tony uses to "flashback" to the day his parents were killed by Winter Soldier doesn't negate events of flashback scenes denoting Howard leaving the house on that same day while Tony was in pool (shown in Iron Man 2 - Public Identity comic). As Tony said in that portion, he wishes it had happened that way. It's likely it in fact happened as shown in Public Identity flashback, with Tony flippantly blowing Howard off the last time they spoke. Presumably the altered flashback was just that to a large degree.
 
Also, Captain America - Civil War definitely cemented the timeline, most notably the confusion over the placement of first Iron Man in 2008 or 2011. Its now confirmed as occurring 8 years before Civil War (so 2008 and 2016). Its also mentioned its been 3 years that the Avengers have operated without any oversight, referencing the fall of SHIELD in CA-Winter Soldier in 2013.

If we're thinking of the same line, I think he actually said said four years. You can hear the line at the beginning of this behind-the-scenes clip here. (I remember hearing it as four years when I saw the film as well.) I don't think there was a specific mention of SHIELD's fall, though, so it seems likely that Ross was actually referring to the first time the group came together in Avengers, which was technically on their own initiative. (This would line up with Avengers taking place in 2012.)

There are also definite references to the amount of time Steve and Falcon have been searching for Bucky without success (in the line to which Steve responds "We didn't blow up the UN") and how many years ago Tony blew up his suits in Iron Man 3 (in the pen/Pepper scene with Tony and Steve.) I think these are both two years, which would weirdly correspond to the release date for Winter Soldier and the onscreen dates for Iron Man 3, but I couldn't remember by the end of both screenings. (It's a long movie!)

Civil War does seem to indicate that the rule that the movies take place in the year they were released trumps any time references on screen or in dialogue. (Though of course, it's only Civil War's dialogue that would indicate this! :P )

TC
 
Little bit of specific timeline info for Civil War.

At beginning, during scene where Wanda is being talked through scoping out surrounding area while sitting and drinking tea/coffee, there's a newspaper on her table with a picture of Crossbones/Rumlow, with headline "Police Stations Robbed" under his picture.

The newspaper is "The Daily", and its the Saturday edition. The top portion is out of focus so no specific date is visible on newspaper, but it does feature a blurb on bottom that reads "2016 Election Conversations, Sunday, March 22, 3-5 PM. Be Part of the Audience."

That would seem to indicate (if the paper is meant to be that day's issue) the modern day portions of Civil War begin on Saturday, March 21, 2016. Of course in reality March 21, 2016 was a Monday, so this is another example where the MCU timeline (in terms of day of week matching up to dates) differs from reality.

It's also entirely possible the newspaper is a bit old (few weeks or months) and Wanda just had it as dossier material, since they were actively looking for Rumlow.

However there is a second newspaper next to the first one, called The Spot (also with a Saturday label) with headline "Weapons Sold to Terrorists", also featuring a picture of Rumlow.

So, if I had to guess, the opening scenes in Lagos happen on March 21, 2016. Presumably the rest of film occurs in late April, with the WHIH promos occurring in early March before events in Lagos, and final one occurring that night (reporting on the Lagos explosion).

Also, the final scene with Tony helping Rhodey try out the new harness to help him walk happens on April 14, 2016. The Fedex package (delivered by Stan Lee in his requisite cameo) is labeled as a 2 Day package, delivered on/by Tuesday, April 14 (April 14 in real world was a Thursday, so Marvel is keeping the habit of date/days not matching reality).

Therefore I can probably determine a precise timeline for the film down to days throughout.

Moved Age of Ultron up a month, so that Zemo's line "I've thought about nothing else for over a year", referring to the Battle of Sokovia and the death of Zemo's family, makes sense.

This is only preliminary until Bluray/DVD comes out and I can time code and double check, but I believe the dates work out like this:

March 21 - Prologue: Lagos Incident
Day 1 / April 5 - Tony's presentation at MIT
Day 2 / April 6 - Cap & Wanda see news report about Lagos, Ross presents Sokovia Accords to team
Day 5 / April 9 - Peggy's Funeral, Bombing at Sokovia Accords UN Assembly
Day 6 / April 10 - Cap finds Bucky in Romania, they're captured by authorities, Steve once again refuses to sign Accords, Zemo brainwashes Bucky and he escapes custody, Cap hides him from authorities, Tony recruits Peter Parker, Clint frees Wanda
Day 7 / April 11 - Battle at Leipzig Airport, Cap and Bucky follow Zemo to Siberia, Tony and Black Panther follow as well, battle between Cap, Tony, and Bucky; Zemo is captured
Day 8 / April 12 - Post-Credit Scene: Peter Parker nurses bruised eye, discovers Spider-signal in web launcher that Tony made for him
Day 10 / April 14 - Tony receives package from Cap, Cap breaks the imprisoned Avengers out of Raft
Day 11 / April 15 - Mid-Credit Scene: Bucky is put into suspended animation in Wakanda, Steve also hides out in Wakanda (presumably with the fugitive Avengers)




If we're thinking of the same line, I think he actually said said four years. You can hear the line at the beginning of this behind-the-scenes clip here. (I remember hearing it as four years when I saw the film as well.) I don't think there was a specific mention of SHIELD's fall, though, so it seems likely that Ross was actually referring to the first time the group came together in Avengers, which was technically on their own initiative. (This would line up with Avengers taking place in 2012.)

There are also definite references to the amount of time Steve and Falcon have been searching for Bucky without success (in the line to which Steve responds "We didn't blow up the UN") and how many years ago Tony blew up his suits in Iron Man 3 (in the pen/Pepper scene with Tony and Steve.) I think these are both two years, which would weirdly correspond to the release date for Winter Soldier and the onscreen dates for Iron Man 3, but I couldn't remember by the end of both screenings. (It's a long movie!)

Civil War does seem to indicate that the rule that the movies take place in the year they were released trumps any time references on screen or in dialogue. (Though of course, it's only Civil War's dialogue that would indicate this! :P )

TC

Think you're right. I thought it was 3 years but my buddy says he remembers it as four years as well. I'll have to watch it again. If it is four years, Ross is simply referring to the creation of the Avengers in 2012, it seems, which makes just as much sense.
 
Last edited:
Me being me, I gotta love the newspaper in the opening of Agents of SHIELD today--both articles appears to be complete, coherent pieces even if we didn't get to see all of them. :D No new info, save that Peggy had two children and that they are still alive as of 2016.

TC
 
The newspaper is "The Daily", and its the Saturday edition. The top portion is out of focus so no specific date is visible on newspaper, but it does feature a blurb on bottom that reads "2016 Election Conversations, Sunday, March 22, 3-5 PM. Be Part of the Audience."

That would seem to indicate (if the paper is meant to be that day's issue) the modern day portions of Civil War begin on Saturday, March 21, 2016. Of course in reality March 21, 2016 was a Monday, so this is another example where the MCU timeline (in terms of day of week matching up to dates) differs from reality.

Also, the final scene with Tony helping Rhodey try out the new harness to help him walk happens on April 14, 2016. The Fedex package (delivered by Stan Lee in his requisite cameo) is labeled as a 2 Day package, delivered on/by Tuesday, April 14 (April 14 in real world was a Thursday, so Marvel is keeping the habit of date/days not matching reality).

Obviously this doesn't fit with the rest of the MCU, but those dates do fit the 2015 weekdays (March 21, 2015 was a Saturday and April 14, 2015 was a Tuesday) because that's when the movie was filmed.
 
Obviously this doesn't fit with the rest of the MCU, but those dates do fit the 2015 weekdays (March 21, 2015 was a Saturday and April 14, 2015 was a Tuesday) because that's when the movie was filmed.

Yup, its just an odd choice given the newspaper specifically reflected the current year of 2016. I honestly think they do that intentionally to differentiate it in some small, weird way, since literally every day of week shown on a newspaper in the MCU doesn't correspond to the real world date and day of week.
 
Me being me, I gotta love the newspaper in the opening of Agents of SHIELD today--both articles appears to be complete, coherent pieces even if we didn't get to see all of them. :D No new info, save that Peggy had two children and that they are still alive as of 2016.

TC

The newspaper headline read that Peggy died at age 95, but technically she died a few days before her 95th birthday. She was born April 9, 1921, but died (presumably) on April 6, 2016 (based on dates and days passing in Civil War).

Still, minor mistake, and it could be assumed they just rounded up her age a few days for the headline's sake.

Tonight's AoS episode 3x20 "Emancipation" occurs "days" (Lincoln mentions he's been in quarantine for days) after previous episode 3x19 "Failed Experiments", which occurred likely during the events of Civil War. I'm assuming its a few days at most since Lincoln doesn't say a week (which if that were the case would put "Failed Experiments" before the main portion of Civil War, but that isn't the case, so I've inserted 3x19 just after the battle between Steve, Bucky, and Tony in Siberia, but before Tony gets the Fedex package from Steve). It can be assumed no mention of the Lagos incident in "Failed Experiments" is due to it not being SHIELD's priority or problem, since they had hands full with the Inhumans and Kree in that episode.
 
Last edited:
In 3x19, Daisy mentions that not much has changed after Hive says that paranoia led to civil war. That's probably just a nod rather than an actual reference, but if it is a reference to the events of Civil War, that would line up with putting 3x19 after/during the movie.
 
Heh, the AoS season finale ended jumping six months into the future, with
Daisy on the run, and Dr. Radcliffe working on a Life Model Decoy named AIDA with Fitz and Simmons
. Wonder if we'll see that as a part of the team in Season 4?

In 3x19, Daisy mentions that not much has changed after Hive says that paranoia led to civil war. That's probably just a nod rather than an actual reference, but if it is a reference to the events of Civil War, that would line up with putting 3x19 after/during the movie.

Yeah I remember that, but I just took it as a nod/Easter egg toward it, not actually addressing the events of Civil War. Especially since the next episode actually does address the events of Civil War.
 
Heh, the AoS season finale ended jumping six months into the future, with
Daisy on the run, and Dr. Radcliffe working on a Life Model Decoy named AIDA with Fitz and Simmons
. Wonder if we'll see that as a part of the team in Season 4?

In 3x19, Daisy mentions that not much has changed after Hive says that paranoia led to civil war. That's probably just a nod rather than an actual reference, but if it is a reference to the events of Civil War, that would line up with putting 3x19 after/during the movie.

Yeah I remember that, but I just took it as a nod/Easter egg toward it, not actually addressing the events of Civil War. Especially since the next episode actually does address the events of Civil War.
 
The Agents of SHIELD team is killing it again with these newspaper props--not only are the articles readable, with a reference to the Sokovia Accords even, they did a New York Bulletin cover in the style of Daredevil with the same logo and everything. :D It's not the Bugle--yet--but I'll take it. ;)

TC
 
AIDA with Dr. Radcliffe. I know people complain about the show not using big names, but I love how obscure they're going with these.
 
AIDA with Dr. Radcliffe. I know people complain about the show not using big names, but I love how obscure they're going with these.


^Right? I actually kind of enjoy the obscure ones almost as much as the more obvious stuff like Creel/Absorbing Man. I had to look this one up and had never heard of AIDA before. That's even better! I love that. Plus while it's never going to utilize the A-listers, it's had a pretty reliable cycle of B and C-list Marvel villains and characters. I'm perfectly fine with that. And the more obscure references are the most intriguing.
 
I was hoping Agent Carter would do the same thing and dig deep into the Atlas era characters. But instead they took characters and made them nothing like the actual people from the books i.e. Whitney Frost.
 
I was hoping Agent Carter would do the same thing and dig deep into the Atlas era characters. But instead they took characters and made them nothing like the actual people from the books i.e. Whitney Frost.

We did get a couple of only appearing in one issue characters like Jason Wilkes, but yeah, 40's heroes would have been ace.
 
They didn't say if those were the only canon, there might be an extra that is canon that isn't on the list

The only thing missing MAY be Jessica Jones #1, but that also doesn't have the stamp and, as far as I know, it's never been actually released in print.
 
They didn't say if those were the only canon, there might be an extra that is canon that isn't on the list

Looks like the question from the original message (in the image) is: "Is the following all of the current MCU canon and only the current MCU canon?" Also, at the bottom of the image, the person asking the question says that if the answer is anything other than "Yes [this is all of the canon and only the canon]", then please acknowledge what should be added or omitted. The "Yes" response from Marvel leads me to believe that the list is all-encompassing.

The only thing missing MAY be Jessica Jones #1, but that also doesn't have the stamp and, as far as I know, it's never been actually released in print.

The print version of Jessica Jones #1 was given out at New York Comic Con in 2015. Sometimes I see a copy show up on eBay (example).
 
The only thing missing MAY be Jessica Jones #1, but that also doesn't have the stamp and, as far as I know, it's never been actually released in print.

According to Bendis, it was canon... but then again he doesn't get final call. It's entirely possible it is canon and was just overlooked.

It doesn't have the stamp, but it's treated as a direct prequel to the show in its plot, and since it's not one of the films and instead is part of the Netflix corner of the universe it may have not had warrant for the big "A" stamp since it's completely unrelated to Avengers in any way.

I don't know. Bendis said it was and it was written as a direct prequel... Someone should double check about JJ #1.
 
Last edited:
According to Bendis, it was canon... but then again he doesn't get final call. It's entirely possible it is canon and was just overlooked.

It doesn't have the stamp, but it's treated as a direct prequel to the show in its plot, and since it's not one of the films and instead is part of the Netflix corner of the universe it may have not had warrant for the big "A" stamp since it's completely unrelated to Avengers in any way.

I don't know. Bendis said it was and it was written as a direct prequel... Someone should double check about JJ #1.

According to Bendis Ultimate End was a good send off ;)
 
Does anyone have a link to where Bendis says that Jessica Jones #1 is canon? Not that it's in continuity with the MCU or that it's set in the MCU, but that it is official canon? The only place I can find where he talks about the comic is on his Tumblr where he says "it is in the marvel tv universe", which of course, does not mean that it is a part of the MCU canon.

EDIT: @MarvelSupport: @mcucanon Yes, Jessica Jones (2015) #1 is considered MCU Cannon.
 
Last edited:

Latest posts

Back
Top