I would even head-canon the 2005 film, since that one isn't linked to anything else as far as I know... but, well, obviously this new film is likely to be true canon. At least in comparison.Same!! The people involved and the fact it was announced on the same day as another Conjuring prequel and more details on the TV show were feels like it could be! In the past i've headcannon-ed the original 1979 one to be in the same universe but this would work a lot better.
I'll get around it soon and maybe make a timeline for it in the replies so it exists and could be added if needed but yeah it seems pretty disconnected.I say watch the film and decide for yourself. I would say it fits the least out of the non-Conjuring Conjuring films since it has no crossover character and it's a comedy film, but it's nothing like including the whole DCEU. The only other potential inclusion is that movie Caged, but that's... well, yeah.
I was going to consider try asking the director/writer about it but it seems like a fun coincidence. The reviews aren't making me wanna watch it lmao.It would be cool if Warden Perez (Caged) was the son of Father Perez (Annabelle), but... well, it could also just be a fun reference. Apparently the movie sucks anyway, lol.
You can even see the metal in the eyes, too. Why has no one brought this up before? It's cool. If it's not canon, I'm head-canoning the **** out of that.Vice Versa
View attachment 4060
View attachment 4061
View attachment 4062
The Conjuring 2
View attachment 4063
It looks like the Warrens removed the metal part of it and got a different stand. Maybe to reduce the chances of its magical properties from activating, but that's just a theory from a guy who has never seen the film.
But wouldn't VV take place after The Conjuring 2? Would that even make sense?You can even see the metal in the eyes, too. Why has no one brought this up before? It's cool. If it's not canon, I'm head-canoning the **** out of that.
Pretty sure that was the main issue with including it, yeahBut wouldn't VV take place after The Conjuring 2? Would that even make sense?
Yes. It would end up in a Buddhist monastery after The Conjuring 2... which is fine because I don't think the skull stayed there in the following films.But wouldn't VV take place after The Conjuring 2? Would that even make sense?
The Nurse
2017?
The Confession
1975-1976. If I had to choose an exact year, 1975 is the most mid-70s.
What's Wrong With Mom?
1970s, because the Warrens are referenced. Maybe post-The Conjuring 2. It released one year later, so uh... 1978?
Blund's Lullaby
Those toothbrushes look VERY modern. I would just say 2017 personally.
Innocent Souls
There's no information, I'd just say 2017.
I'm happy you brought that up because I was about to run through those next! I think at the time I was placing them in the past to be alongside the movies but I'm open to them being in the present.I've got some thoughts on the short films.
All years are technically speculation, but:
1975 - The Confession
1978 - What's Wrong With Mom?
2017 - The Nurse
2017 - Blund's Lullaby
2017 - Innocent Souls
The Confession
Just reading the comments again and the creator's intent is for it to be more timeless but also with a 70s aesthetic. Just noticed they're reading the book 'Mysteries of the Unexplained' (first edition) which was first published in 1982 or 1985 but that could be ignored. It is very clearly the 1970s.
What's Wrong With Mom?
I think I placed it in the 60s before just to show more of the Warrens in their prime but it's got much more of a 70s feel so i'm happy with 1978. Not too relevant but I like to headcanon this is where the Warrens went in Annabelle Comes Home.
Blund's Lullaby
You're right about the toothbrushes lol, there's also the Willy the Kid book first published in 1976 so really anytime after then. Also looks like a more modern light switch toward the end.
Innocent Souls
I think before I was leaning somewhere around the 1980s to be close to the movies and the fact they're using flashlights and lighters instead of iPhones but the clothes look more modern, could go anywhere really. I'm happy with placing it in the present.
Why wouldn't Dirty Laundry be canon?I need to watch Vice Versa and Caged. A friend told me that, while Caged sucks, it fits in pretty well and doesn't contradict anything. Obviously it doesn't have any creative BTS connection, just a shared actor, so it depends on how much weight you put on that. Personally, I do consider, say, Punisher: Dirty Laundry canon, so I guess I'd count Caged.
… with the same actor?It's a fan film.
Those shorts can be bullshited in, but they better work in their own reality where Annabelle is an "actress" living in the New Line Cinema office being bored while on quarantineand admiring her work on TCU and kinda missing being in spot light. anyway her feelings is just my interpretation. crazy we waited a year for the sequel to it (the first one literally ends on to be continued. ah remember when it got released XD)There's also two Annabelle quarantine videos, but they probably don't count unfortunately.
Of course, since The Conjuring is an in-universe movie in our world, with our con-artist Warrens, it stands to reason it's an in-universe movie in their world, with their demon-fighting Warrens.Those shorts can be bullshited in, but they better work in their own reality where Annabelle is an "actress" living in the New Line office being bored and admiring her work on TCU
edited my previous message.Of course, since The Conjuring is an in-universe movie in our world, with our con-artist Warrens, it stands to reason it's an in-universe movie in their world, with their demon-fighting Warrens.