ProjectX2
Don't expect me to take you with me when I go to s
I just got back from Watchmen.
I don't really know what to say so I'm just going to ramble for a bit. I wasn't really excited for this movie. It's a brilliant graphic novel but what was the point of adapting a story that was already perfected in comics? But of course, Hollywood is running out of ideas, so they may as well use the best ideas.
I think it was probably worth it.
It's a good movie. It's not great but it's good. It's a worthy adaption. Yes, bits of it are changed but the overall story and themes remain intact. Some of it did just look like flashy action crap - but a lot of it was also magnificent, perfect and beautiful Watchmen.
The cast is good. Not perfect but close enough, I say. Rorschach was great except sometimes his mumbling was indecipherable (a problem Bale also had with Batman). Silk Spectre was a bit... off however she was still lovely. Nite-Owl was both heroic and pathetic. The Comedian was a monster. Ozymandias... well, sometimes he was great and sometimes he was quite poor. His accent broke through a couple of times which made him sound weird. I still have a problem with his appearance - he doesn't look magnificent enough. He's always wearing purple to symbolize his royalty and power - but his face... I don't know. There's always that little bit of evil hiding in his face.
But Billy Crudup as Doc Manhattan... wow. I'm impressed. He was so realistic.
The ending was changed. It still made sense though. One of the reasons why people didn't think Watchmen would work on film was the squid, and I agree with that. I do think that the ending could have been fleshed out better but it was suitable for the film.
So... Watchmen. It was good. I am happy enough with it. There would never be a perfect adaption because it was not made for film but I think Snyder has come close enough.
Also, hairs stood up in some scenes. They reminded me of the magnificent work Alan Moore has created. People will credit Zack Snyder for directing the film but it's Alan Moore where all the credit lies. He is the one that has created this beautiful piece of art and one of the greatest stories I have ever read. I feel sad for him because of what has happened to him and I do understand his views but this is no reason for people to insult him and call him a douche. He is standing up for what he believes in, defending one of the best stories ever crafted in its original form. So all of you people can shut up and just enjoy both versions, okay?
This post has a lot of rambling in it.
If you haven't read the book, don't see this. You need to experience the story in its original form in order to get the full effect. The film is Watchmen For Dummies. This isn't an insult, it's still a good movie, but it's always going to be lacking in something - the fact that it's a movie and not a comic.
At the end of the day, I'm just glad I now have two versions of an excellent story. The film has reminded me of Watchmen's brilliance and I can't wait until I crack it open to read it again.
I don't really know what to say so I'm just going to ramble for a bit. I wasn't really excited for this movie. It's a brilliant graphic novel but what was the point of adapting a story that was already perfected in comics? But of course, Hollywood is running out of ideas, so they may as well use the best ideas.
I think it was probably worth it.
It's a good movie. It's not great but it's good. It's a worthy adaption. Yes, bits of it are changed but the overall story and themes remain intact. Some of it did just look like flashy action crap - but a lot of it was also magnificent, perfect and beautiful Watchmen.
The cast is good. Not perfect but close enough, I say. Rorschach was great except sometimes his mumbling was indecipherable (a problem Bale also had with Batman). Silk Spectre was a bit... off however she was still lovely. Nite-Owl was both heroic and pathetic. The Comedian was a monster. Ozymandias... well, sometimes he was great and sometimes he was quite poor. His accent broke through a couple of times which made him sound weird. I still have a problem with his appearance - he doesn't look magnificent enough. He's always wearing purple to symbolize his royalty and power - but his face... I don't know. There's always that little bit of evil hiding in his face.
But Billy Crudup as Doc Manhattan... wow. I'm impressed. He was so realistic.
The ending was changed. It still made sense though. One of the reasons why people didn't think Watchmen would work on film was the squid, and I agree with that. I do think that the ending could have been fleshed out better but it was suitable for the film.
So... Watchmen. It was good. I am happy enough with it. There would never be a perfect adaption because it was not made for film but I think Snyder has come close enough.
Also, hairs stood up in some scenes. They reminded me of the magnificent work Alan Moore has created. People will credit Zack Snyder for directing the film but it's Alan Moore where all the credit lies. He is the one that has created this beautiful piece of art and one of the greatest stories I have ever read. I feel sad for him because of what has happened to him and I do understand his views but this is no reason for people to insult him and call him a douche. He is standing up for what he believes in, defending one of the best stories ever crafted in its original form. So all of you people can shut up and just enjoy both versions, okay?
This post has a lot of rambling in it.
If you haven't read the book, don't see this. You need to experience the story in its original form in order to get the full effect. The film is Watchmen For Dummies. This isn't an insult, it's still a good movie, but it's always going to be lacking in something - the fact that it's a movie and not a comic.
At the end of the day, I'm just glad I now have two versions of an excellent story. The film has reminded me of Watchmen's brilliance and I can't wait until I crack it open to read it again.