If it's not a good example then step-up and show some proof why. Gemini did and if that's not a "good example" I'd like to see why exactly.
I can fix the vote, but not your name, sorry.I already posted the other photos in the thread we were discussing this in, should we move them here?
Edit: *************************! I clicked on Letterier's Hulk by accident! I definitely think Lee's Hulk looked better and my vote should say that. And we should probably make it clearer that this is about the Hulk CGI character himself and not the movie.
Thanks for the photos. This makes it better to discuss about.Lee:
You guys are telling me you think the second set looks more like a solid, living creature with real skin?
There you go, mole. All fixed.
And again, I totally agree with everything Mole says.
And yeah, I'm still scared about that. :shock:
A lot of the comments here seem directed at just how he looks in terms of coolness and comics-accuracy and all that. That's a different story, and I prefer Letterier's Hulk in those areas too. But in terms of just how much I believed the figure onscreen, whether or not he looked like a big baby, was made of flesh and bone and wasn't a video-game character, Lee's beats it by 3-mile leaps and bounds.