ourchair
Well-Known Member
A pox on both camps.
I think the problem with all this discussion of whether or not Ledger deserves an Oscar for his Joker cheapens both his performance AND his death.
His performance is great, but to debate over its Oscar-worthiness is like saying it can only be validated by an Oscar rather than whether or not people appreciated it in the first place.
I think part of the reason that discussion has emerged is BECAUSE Ledger died, and people feel that the only way to validate his tragically cut short path to brilliance is to give him that Oscar, which is ALSO insulting to his death.
I think the problem with all this discussion of whether or not Ledger deserves an Oscar for his Joker cheapens both his performance AND his death.
His performance is great, but to debate over its Oscar-worthiness is like saying it can only be validated by an Oscar rather than whether or not people appreciated it in the first place.
I think part of the reason that discussion has emerged is BECAUSE Ledger died, and people feel that the only way to validate his tragically cut short path to brilliance is to give him that Oscar, which is ALSO insulting to his death.