Ice
Teh Sexy Monkey Queen
Someone did some recoloring:
Someone did some recoloring:
I like them all except #4. A giant yellow bat symbol on his chest doesn't do much to back up him emerging from the shadows and being the Dark Knight.
I think that's what they were going for.
I read somewhere sometime (I think in the Batman encyclopedia…) that the big bold yellow symbol was strategic. It drew attention so that people he was attacking would aim there if they shot at him. That spot was also the most armoured part of his suit. I thought that was a pretty cool explanation.
sounds like the name of a crappy videogame imo.
CBR:
Batman-news.com has posted a new rumor about the design for Jesse Eisenberg's Lex Luthor: apparently, he'll have "a lot of hair." The report states that Luthor's hair will be "a big longer, kind of loose and wavy, and it's dirty blonde." In terms of personality, the rumor goes on to note Luthor's mannerisms are "spastic … like a 20-something guy that pounds energy drinks all day."
It's worth saying that in previous "Superman" movies, Lex Luthor has shown up with hair, so this is hardly unprecedented territory -- and it's still definitely a rumor, so take it with a grain of salt.
What evidence is that?I don't really care if he has hair or not. I'm going to be more disappointed if they change Luthor to some Zuckerberg type, which all the evidence seems to point to them doing.
What evidence is that?
If that's the case, I don't get it either. If you feel like you need to change a character so drastically, just create a new character to be what you need it to be instead of changing an established one. What is the point? You use an established character in order to have something that fans who like it can identify...so why would you change the character into something that doesn't resemble what he traditionally has been?
Granted I don't read a ton of Superman comics but I've never known Lex Luthor to be the type that has a basketball court in his office.
They've already changed Superman beyond recognition, why not Lex Luthor?
What evidence is that?
They've already changed Superman beyond recognition, why not Lex Luthor?
"...the rumor goes on to note Luthor's mannerisms are 'spastic … like a 20-something guy that pounds energy drinks all day.'"
Good point. At first, I was confused when I hear people complain about Superman's depiction in Man of Steel. I thought I had watched a Punisher movie. Didn't even realize it was supposed to be Superman.
Good point. At first, I was confused when I hear people complain about Superman's depiction in Man of Steel. I thought I had watched a Punisher movie. Didn't even realize it was supposed to be Superman.
Can't say I blame you. Superheroes killing makes me sick.
These statements don't even make sense, now.
I replied to his snarky sarcastic comment with my own snarky only half-sarcastic comment. Also who said I didn't have a problem with The Ulimates killing?
I was being sarcastic in response to the exaggerated claim that the superman in the movie was unrecognizable.
While I didn't love MOS, I've defended it in the past. I don't even have a problem with him killing Zod, I just have an issue with the awkward way it was staged. Who knows, if they address it in the Batman/Superman movie some of my issues could be relieved.