Iron Man discussion (Spoilers!)

The Comic Board - Collecting, Buy, Sell, Trade & Comic News, Reviews & Discussion

Help Support The Comic Board:

How would you rate Iron Man?


  • Total voters
    54
I could explain why I don't approve of doing that, but then I'd just sound stuffy. :wink:

Regardless, you either make the decision or don't and then stand by it. If you find yourself questioning your methods then you obviously think somethign is flawed. What you need to do is reassess how you handle or difuse these kind of situation and find a solution and act accordingly. If you don't like to cover their eyes but don't agree with your sister watching stark make out, then drop some candy or popcorn on the floor and say "WHOOPS, you need to pick that up for the next 5 minutes or until I say I don't want it."

Not trying to really tell you how to run things, just something to think about. Also today is my Friday and this last hour couldn't go any slower. I'm going to the Zoo wednesday...if money allows.
 
I had no idea she was going to watch it; the rest of my family ('sides me) was on a plane and it's what they were showing. So who knows? They may have even cut that scene from the film for the airlines. But I doubt it.
 
I had no idea she was going to watch it; the rest of my family ('sides me) was on a plane and it's what they were showing. So who knows? They may have even cut that scene from the film for the airlines. But I doubt it.

well that changes things entirely, tie your parents up and beat them bloody. Or give them your two cents, whatever works.
 
When I was a kid the only movie I wasn't allowed to watch was Born on the Forth of July.

Of course, movies were tougher back then too, especially kids movies.

I watched Young Guns constantly when I was 8/9 for Christ's sake.

Movies don't hurt kids.
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.
Re: Iron Man movie news.

Soaring Hi-Def Features on Blu-ray:

One of the most anticipated releases of the year, the IRON MAN Blu-ray presentation offers even more exclusive content for an incredible entertainment experience including a "Hall of Armor" that allows fans to enter the Stark database to zoom in on any of the three Iron Man suits -- or Iron Monger. They can then activate the digital 3-D schematics to check out every weapon and the full high-definition renders let users fly around each suit to explore each of the armors in comprehensive detail.

The "Iron Man IQ" is a user-friendly web application that lets users create and share new multiple choice quizzes based on clips from the film. Fans can also download other users' challenges via BD-Live.

more info and dvd info http://www.superherohype.com/news/ironmannews.php?id=7578


Holy crap. The bluray features sound great. I really want to try out that IQ hopefully we can send the questions via ps3
 
On sale 9/30/08

ironman2dvdnew2.jpg
 
It's not always JUST about money.

I mean the piece says it one of the reasons, but it's also entirely possible that Marvel took a much longer time to hammer out the talent contracts or the location dates and other logistic matters than they should have, leaving Howard too tied up to commit once they finally did.

The same thing happened to Bryan Singer and the third X-Men film (though in this case, it was Fox, not Marvel Studios/Paramount) as the deal-making process took so long that by the time they started making real progress towards a commitment, Warner had already lured him away with Superman.
 
Last edited:
Actually it wasn't anything on Howard's part, it seems Marvel may become one of the ********* studios

Source:NPR, CHUD
October 18, 2008

"It was the surprise of a lifetime," he said. "There was no explanation. [The contract] just...up and vanished. I read something in the trades implicating that it was about money or something, but apparently the contracts that we write and sign aren't worth the paper that they're printed on, sometimes. Promises aren't kept, and good faith negotiations aren't always held up."
 
Terrance Howard leaving could of easily have been handled.



All they needed to do was have Robert Downey Jr. play his character from Topic Thunder.
 
Last edited:
Based on the Howard interview about the handshake agreements and the like, I get the feeling it had more to do with Marvel acting like Fox basically.

If you think about it, Iron Man is their most successful outing since they became their own studio and everything else is taking forever to get down the development pipes.

Can't blame them, since they are for all intents and purposes, a 'fledgling studio' learning its way based entirely on experiences with earlier deals.
 
Howard was the PERFECT Rhodey. I mean, if Robert Downey JR. *is* Tony Stark, then Terence Howard *is* Jim Rhodes. And he was on casting calls and dream casts long before he was hired to play Rhodey in the Iron Man film. They should have just given him what he wanted. Nothing personal against Don Cheadle, but yeah....him and Howard are too different....
 
Can't blame them, since they are for all intents and purposes, a 'fledgling studio' learning its way based entirely on experiences with earlier deals.
When you put it like that than I don't see it as a dick move
Howard was the PERFECT Rhodey. I mean, if Robert Downey JR. *is* Tony Stark, then Terence Howard *is* Jim Rhodes. And he was on casting calls and dream casts long before he was hired to play Rhodey in the Iron Man film. They should have just given him what he wanted. Nothing personal against Don Cheadle, but yeah....him and Howard are too different....

Again, it was completely Marvel's call, Howard wanted to do a sequel but was dropped. He didn't demand anything they just dropped him. Read 4 posts up
 
I'm torn about this. I'll miss Howard but i the same time i thinkDon Cheadle is an excellent actor and wouldn't mind seeing him as Rhodes.
 
Hate this. Hate it. Ruins the wonderful series-momentum the first film did unprecedentally well. "Next time, baby"... one of the most talked-about lines from the film.... is now meaningless. I cannot see how this move will cost less and save more trouble in the short or long run, fledgling studio or not.
 
I don't like this, but it's rediculous to say that Howard was even among the five best things about the first film. In most scenes I couldn't tell whether they were best friends or business associates. If they recast RDjr or even Gwenyth Paltrow, I'd be pissed off. This is upsetting and obnoxious, but honestly, I bet Cheadle will play off of RDjr better than Howard.

This in no way affects my intense desire to see the next movie.
 
Last edited:
I don't like this, but it's rediculous to say that Howard was even among the five best things about the first film. In most scenes I couldn't tell whether they were best friends or business associates. If they recast RDjr or even Gwenyth Paltrow, I'd be pissed off. This is upsetting and obnoxious, but honestly, I bet Cheadle will play off of RDjr better than Howard.

This in no way affects my intense desire to see the next movie.

I agree.
 
It affects me in that I see a movie like this as an oasis of sanity in the often quite insane business of superhero movies or movies in general. It's a good old-fashioned thing they just simply, flat-out got right. Complicating it with crap like this ruins that air. Plus, like I said, I really enjoyed the promises the first movie made and the momentum they gave the film as part of a series. Now they're breaking one of the biggest ones, for seemingly no reason, right out of the stable. ???

It wasn't broken, they don't need to fix it, let alone try and cram a completely different gear in there.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top