Batman and Robin (Morrison/various) discussion

The Comic Board - Collecting, Buy, Sell, Trade & Comic News, Reviews & Discussion

Help Support The Comic Board:

Reading through this thread, it looks like no one's really discussing the villains, which I think warrant observation. It also ties very nicely into the "Who the **** is Oberon Sexton" line of inquiry. Rather than marking this with spoiler tags, it's probably better for me to just say that this will contain spoilers for anyone who hasn't read every Grant Morrison story ever.

There have been a number of insane annotators and bloggers who have gone into far more detail than I am capable of with the interconnectedness and detail of Morrison's stories at DC. I have some ideas, but they aren't really as comprehensive as certain other fans. Given that Batman and Robin is the extension of Morrison's work on Batman and Final Crisis, which tie directly into his JLA and Seven Soldiers, utilizing ideas established in Animal Man and Batman: Gothic, there is no such thing as a self contained story in this man's work. As such, I'm still speculating on the significance of Arkham Asylum: A Serious House On Serious Earth. But more on that later.

So far in Batman and Robin we've seen Professor Pyg, Jason Todd/The Red Hood, Flamingo, one of Darkseid's Batman soldiers from Final Crisis, hints villainy in the Wayne line, Talia Al Ghul and the enigmatic Domino killer, who may or may not be related to one of the characters listed above. It also looks like we're going to be seeing a bit of Doctor Hurt (possibly with the remaining Club of Villains in tow), and there's still the perpetual question of Oberon Sexton's alignment. But Morrison tends to like clear cut heroes and villains with little shades of gray, so it's safe to assume that he's one or the other. Of course, it's a Batman story, so there's that intrinsic question in discussing the antagonists; what does the Joker have to do with this?

In the Joker prose story from early on in his Batman run, and during RIP, Morrison rewrote the Joker into a deranged lunatic. And it *was* a rewriting, even if 'deranged lunatic' is the only inherently necessary feature of the Joker's many incarnations, it's now what defines him entirely. In RIP he was knocked off of a bridge by Damien and hasn't been seen since. We think. Similarly, Talia Al Ghul is now more of a villain than ever; what, with her eugenics experiments and Ninja Man-Bats. If I'm right, then these retools are linked and given what we know about the Domino killer and the resurgence of Talia's manipulations, I just think I might be.

But allow me to explain.

Take a close look at all of the panels closely involving Oberon Sexton's investigations into the Domino killings across the globe. You'll notice that most of them are former members of Doctor Hurt's Black Glove. The first of them is the mustached fat guy (who probably had a name that I'm forgetting) from RIP; he was the first Black Glove member we saw killed, with his neck snapped by the Joker. He is also the first on Oberon Sexton's list. Next we have Jezebel Jet, killed by Talia's Ninja Man-Bats at the very end of RIP. If you look at Oberon's bulletin board at the beginning B&R#10, he has an issue of Time Magazine with Jezebel on the cover pinned to it, marking the second recorded Domino killing.

So, what does this mean? Well, both the people Talia and the Joker have killed are listed as being victims of the Domino killer. Talia also has a brainwashed Damien attacking Dick Grayson. The most obvious conclusion to draw is that Talia found the Joker after Damien ran him off of a bridge, and repurposed him as her executioner, going after the remaining Black Glove members and villains in Gotham who could threaten her interests in some way. I'm willing to bet that the brainwashing techniques she used on Damien and The Joker will be somehow similar.

This also lends credibility to the idea that Bruce Wayne is Oberon Sexton. If we assume that the Domino Killer is The Joker having his strings pulled by Talia Al Ghul, then it would make a lot of sense for Bruce to be tracking down his greatest enemies in a new disguise, which is what Oberon seems to be doing. There's probably a significance to his name, too, with "Oberon" being the legendary king of the fairies in Medieval mythology and, well, ten minutes researching the word/name "Sexton" brings up all sorts of interesting results. And it's Grant Morrison. Whether you like him or not, he's got a thing for symbolism, and nothing is in his comics by accident.

Another thing about Grant Morrison is that he loves the Silver Age and the Adam West TV show. I'm thinking that what he's doing is putting Batman in a series of more and more elaborate traps to escape from, as was typical of older incarnations of the character. Of course, this is the modern age, so rather than having Batman and Robin tied to an underwater sinking anvil, the traps will be more existential. First, we have the Black Glove crippling him psychologically and burying him alive. And in a display of over-preparedness rivaling Bat-Shark-Repellent-Spray, Batman had created a back-up personality just in case anyone would ever attack his mind. Next, he was imprisoned by Darkseid's minions in an attempt to harness his life's tragedy to drive an army of clones, which Bruce realized and subsequently utilized his memories instead to destroy the army. You know, because he's Batman. And now, with this trend in escalation, he's been unstuck in time, a la Billy Pilgrim. So, did Batman escape "The Death That Is Life" (like Mister Miracle did before him in Seven Soldiers) and contrive a new identity to combat his old enemies? It certainly seems likely to me, although I've read other theories about Sexton's identity that are credible.

Naturally, the idea of Bruce's consciousness time traveling ties into this sticky issue with the Wayne ancestry and Doctor Hurt. Is Hurt Thomas Wayne? Is he one of the *other* Thomas Waynes (or otherwise-named Wayne ancestors)? Is he the literal devil? A metaphorical devil? Mangrove Pierce, like Bruce thought? Is he Bruce himself, either as a manifestation of his mental breakdown during RIP, or a result of his time travel shenanigans? Well, all of these ideas have various elements in the story that qualify them. What seems likely to me, however, will only make sense if you read Batman: Gothic, an old Morrison story. Morrison's old comics have foreshadowed his contemporary story arcs before, and this one dealt with the summoning a Satanic figure. Now, we're told that the "Black sheep" of the Wayne family used the dark arts to resurrect a Bat-demon of some sort. My theory is that this was the demonic Doctor Hurt, a man perpetually plaguing Bruce's life. If this is correct, I think it's safe to assume that Bruce will witness (and likely try unsuccessfully to prevent) the raising of Doc Hurt during his travels through time, and Hurt himself will be a reoccurring antagonist for Bruce during the "Return of Bruce Wayne" story arc, confronting him in every time period he lives through.

Okay, so I think I've just about covered my bases. What do you guys think?
 
I like the idea of Hurt's origins and machinations being explored in The Return of Bruce Wayne... It does seem to make sense that whatever creature was summoned up from the deep would turn out to be this demonic figure that dominated the first step of Morrison's Bat-Epic. It's held up that the pilgrim era witchhunter batman is on the cover of #2 of the Return of Bruce Wayne. This way the first issue would introduce the situation that he's in, and the second would bring in the villain... The jokeresque figure on the cover of #2 has me intrigued... Is it just going to be that the very existence of a Batman pulls a Joker into existence? It does seem likely that we'll see the introduction of Hurt during these stories.

I'm also intrigued by the idea of the Joker having become the executioner for Talia Al Ghul... This could be the first few steps towards making her every bit of the adversary to Batman her father was... There's also the possibility that he is, in fact, Oberon Sexton as many internetting fiends have tended to suggest. Both could be true... He could be fabricating the existence of the Domino Killer as a cover for the actions of his partner, Talia... But it would seem that Sexton has been around long enough to have a reputation... Perhaps his reputation in Gotham began as a detective working on the murder of the Waynes... Like the pulp detective we see on the cover of Return #5. Bruce just seems almost too obvious an answer at this point.

The other thing that occurred to me as a possibility after thinking on what life with Bruce Wayne back in the main DCU is going to be like is for them to finally go the way of The Flash... Why can't Dick/Damien and Bruce/Tim work as two pairs of Batman and Robin? It would lead to some interesting tension. I'd imagine that Dick would stick to the team superheroics, teaching Damien how to save the world at large on a day-to-day basis, while Bruce and Tim keep Gotham safe. It would be an interesting solution to the problem that's going to rise quickly after the return.
 
I agreed with you initially that Bruce was "too obvious", but I'm starting to lean toward him as Oberon Sexton. I don't really think that Morrison is going for a "reveal" here in the traditional sense; he's not trying to surprise you or subvert your expectations. Just maintaining a bit of mystery before unveiling an element that fits nicely into his jigsaw-puzzle of a plot.

And I sincerely doubt that DC's editorial staff would allow for there to be multiple characters wearing a Batman costume at once. Multiple Flashes? Yes. Hundreds of thousands of Kryptonians? Sure. Wonder Woman flying around in love-powered pink Witchblade armor? Well, feminism has never exactly been a chief concern of this industry. But Batman is DC's golden goose. It's why Bruce is returning ahead of schedule, and I'm willing to bet it's why Dick will step down. In fact, in issue #10, Dick explicitly says that if Bruce comes back, he and Damien won't be Batman and Robin anymore. I like the idea of Bruce and Dick fulfilling the different roles that Batman has in the DCU (since it's pretty inconceivable for one man to perform all of these functions), but, again, I just sort of doubt it practically.
 
So, I think issue #11 confirms that I'm entirely right about everything. Or, at the very least, things seem to be moving in the direction I thought they would. Cool.
 
I just finished reading Batman Reborn (issues 1-6) and freaking loved it. All the little Morrison-isms backed by Frank Quitely's art - this is the perfect comic.

In the back Morrison talks about how he wanted this book to feel different than other Batman books and boy howdy does it...I love how Batman almost feels like the sidekick - not in the field, but when they are talking and planning. Damien is an awesome character and I could read him in this book forever.

The only thing I could come even close to complaining about is the artist change but it's only because I love Frank Quitely's work and it fits perfectly with Grant Morrison's writing for some reason that I can't even identify.

10/10
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.
Oberon Sexton is The Joker!

I loved the Damian stuff in this issue. He is becoming a great character.

The Return of Bruce Wayne is going to be nuts.
 
Oberon Sexton is The Joker!

I loved the Damian stuff in this issue. He is becoming a great character.

The Return of Bruce Wayne is going to be nuts.

Awesome. Wish I hadn't read that spoiler though.

I wanted to see Quitely draw the Joker though.....:(

YES.

Nuts.

Going to try and track this down now.
 
Oberon Sexton. Oberon. King of the fairies. Hurm.

Okay, so I was wrong about him being a time-displaced Bruce Wayne. It looks like I got all of the stuff about the domino killings and (hopefully) Doctor Hurt/El Penitente correct, so here's to that.

Loved the issue, though. This series continues to impress me.
 
I wanted to see Quitely draw the Joker though.....:(

Here you go:

haha-570x864.jpg
 
Loved the last issue, although I think the 'join-the-dots' bat signal was even cooler than Oberon Sexton's identity. I've really been digging this latest three-parter, I must say.

Anyone else a little bit underwhelmed by the recent covers, though? #12's was horrible and completely unrepresentative of Quitely's otherwise stellar work.
 
While I'm really uninterested in THE RETURN OF BRUCE WAYNE (is there any qualitative difference between Grayson's Batman and Wayne's? I think not - Damien is a terrific take on Robin, but Grayson's Batman is really not that different, I keep forgetting he's Grayson) and while I felt the previous arc with the Lazarus pit was rather poop, and while I've not been thrilled by this latest arc, #12 had a terrific ending.

While Sexton being the Joker is the only person he could be once you go, "It's not Bruce Wayne", in that it's rather obvious that it has to be him to hold any weight (and it doesn't make sense) I don't really care because of the way Batman worked it out: the killings are JOKES. That is a brilliant little bit of deduction I had missed and it's a terrific pay off.

Another way to put it: I'm not enjoying Morrison's style of late (I'm not hating it, though, just not really digging it), I think what he's done, the story, is a terrific idea. Really loved the twist, and it's why I read Batman. Great reveal because I like it despite it not making sense, and despite that it's the Joker again, and that it's really kinda pointless. It's all stupid and gratuitous but I don't care because it's just damn cool.
 
While I'm really uninterested in THE RETURN OF BRUCE WAYNE (is there any qualitative difference between Grayson's Batman and Wayne's? I think not - Damien is a terrific take on Robin, but Grayson's Batman is really not that different, I keep forgetting he's Grayson) and while I felt the previous arc with the Lazarus pit was rather poop, and while I've not been thrilled by this latest arc, #12 had a terrific ending.

While Sexton being the Joker is the only person he could be once you go, "It's not Bruce Wayne", in that it's rather obvious that it has to be him to hold any weight (and it doesn't make sense) I don't really care because of the way Batman worked it out: the killings are JOKES. That is a brilliant little bit of deduction I had missed and it's a terrific pay off.

Another way to put it: I'm not enjoying Morrison's style of late (I'm not hating it, though, just not really digging it), I think what he's done, the story, is a terrific idea. Really loved the twist, and it's why I read Batman. Great reveal because I like it despite it not making sense, and despite that it's the Joker again, and that it's really kinda pointless. It's all stupid and gratuitous but I don't care because it's just damn cool.

Everything that Morrison's written at DC for the past few years makes complete sense if you bother to read it all. It's nonlinear, strange and roundabout, but definitely entirely sensible. It's become apparent that The Joker was found by Talia after Damien knocked him off of that bridge in Batman RIP, was repurposed as the executioner she mentioned in her crusade against the Black Glove. This is confirmed by the killings they've both committed against the organization being listed in tandem with (what have been revealed as The Joker/Oberon's) Domino killings. It's possible that Talia doesn't play into the equation, and that Talia's murder of Jezebel being listed along the others was just a red herring via The Joker's characteristic misdirection, but given how much emphasis there's been on her neural control mechanisms, I kinda doubt it. Especially given The Joker's new personality (though, again, The Joker reinventing himself is a shtick Morrison commonly attributes to him). Anyway, it seems that Doctor Hurt himself has been tracking The Joker down, hence the dummy Sexton identity. This may or may not tie into the subplot with the Barbatos entity.

And while Dick Grayson's just been treated as Bruce Wayne-lite in most of the other Bat books on the stands, I think that Morrison's added enough good character moments to make his presence noteworthy in B&R. You have this neurotic, insecure and overall friendly Batman, almost in line with his silver age incarnation, as opposed to the Frank Miller inspired, constantly narrating neo-noir caricature that's dominated Batman comics since DKR. Grayson's contrast is especially evident given the diametrically antithetical deconstructionist approach Morrison's taken to Bruce for the last 25 years, attempting to integrate elements of the thelemic superman archetype that we know he has a hard-on for. If you look, you can see tons of Crowley's influence in RIP. I agree that Damien stands out more, but that's mostly because his character is just more ostentatious. Batman is (and should be) a bit more subdued.
 
I totally don't get the thinking that Grayson as Batman is not that different than Bruce Wayne. He's not as cold. The whole dynamic between Batman and Robin is different in part because of that, and in part because Robin is "spunkier". He comes off as completely different to me. He's much more self conscious and uneasy.
 
Everything that Morrison's written at DC for the past few years makes complete sense if you bother to read it all. It's nonlinear, strange and roundabout, but definitely entirely sensible. It's become apparent that The Joker was found by Talia after Damien knocked him off of that bridge in Batman RIP, was repurposed as the executioner she mentioned in her crusade against the Black Glove. This is confirmed by the killings they've both committed against the organization being listed in tandem with (what have been revealed as The Joker/Oberon's) Domino killings. It's possible that Talia doesn't play into the equation, and that Talia's murder of Jezebel being listed along the others was just a red herring via The Joker's characteristic misdirection, but given how much emphasis there's been on her neural control mechanisms, I kinda doubt it. Especially given The Joker's new personality (though, again, The Joker reinventing himself is a shtick Morrison commonly attributes to him). Anyway, it seems that Doctor Hurt himself has been tracking The Joker down, hence the dummy Sexton identity. This may or may not tie into the subplot with the Barbatos entity.

And while Dick Grayson's just been treated as Bruce Wayne-lite in most of the other Bat books on the stands, I think that Morrison's added enough good character moments to make his presence noteworthy in B&R. You have this neurotic, insecure and overall friendly Batman, almost in line with his silver age incarnation, as opposed to the Frank Miller inspired, constantly narrating neo-noir caricature that's dominated Batman comics since DKR. Grayson's contrast is especially evident given the diametrically antithetical deconstructionist approach Morrison's taken to Bruce for the last 25 years, attempting to integrate elements of the thelemic superman archetype that we know he has a hard-on for. If you look, you can see tons of Crowley's influence in RIP. I agree that Damien stands out more, but that's mostly because his character is just more ostentatious. Batman is (and should be) a bit more subdued.


Wait. What? :dazed:
 
Wait. What? :dazed:

The Joker's The Domino killer. He may or may not have been working for Talia. He's been primarily targeting members of The Black Glove, which eventually attracted the attention of Doctor Hurt/El Penitente, and the Oberon Sexton identity was a way to covertly continue his serial killing.

If you look at the lists of Domino killings in earlier issues (particularly the bulletin board in issue #10), you'll notice that the first recording murder is the one perpetrated by The Joker in RIP. The next, Jezebel Jet's death via Ninja Man Bat, was the handiwork of Talia in the last sequence of RIP, which makes me think that she's still involved.
 
Everything that Morrison's written at DC for the past few years makes complete sense if you bother to read it all. It's nonlinear, strange and roundabout, but definitely entirely sensible. It's become apparent that The Joker was found by Talia after Damien knocked him off of that bridge in Batman RIP, was repurposed as the executioner she mentioned in her crusade against the Black Glove. This is confirmed by the killings they've both committed against the organization being listed in tandem with (what have been revealed as The Joker/Oberon's) Domino killings. It's possible that Talia doesn't play into the equation, and that Talia's murder of Jezebel being listed along the others was just a red herring via The Joker's characteristic misdirection, but given how much emphasis there's been on her neural control mechanisms, I kinda doubt it. Especially given The Joker's new personality (though, again, The Joker reinventing himself is a shtick Morrison commonly attributes to him). Anyway, it seems that Doctor Hurt himself has been tracking The Joker down, hence the dummy Sexton identity. This may or may not tie into the subplot with the Barbatos entity.

Okay, when I say "It doesn't make sense", I don't mean "there isn't a chronological chain of events that have causal effect", what I mean is that it doesn't make sense. The big, convoluted conspiracy, as much as I love them, are generally completely nonsensical. Characters do melodramatic things that no one would ever do in order to achieve their ends. This happens in espionage and heist stories. The characters create these elaborate plans with a thousand plot holes and plan their failures, and it's just nonsense. You don't plan for failure, and you don't plan to get caught. Now, elaborate plans are part of the fun of these stories, so it's a hard balance to strike between elaborate and over-the-top. Really hard to do. But if Talia wants to kill The Black Glove, she does not look for a man who might be dead and a man who is completely uncontrollable and send him out as a secret assassin. Especially when she has Deathstroke the Terminator on her payroll. She is a cool, calculating Queen. It doesn't fit.

Joker being the Domino killer and Sexton is cool, it is fun, but it makes no sense. Joker does not need to pretend to be Sexton for any reason at all. He already destroyed the Black Glove, and he's arrogant so why would he hide from him?

But you know what? It would make sense if it was Deathstroke the Terminator.

He was hired by Talia to take out the new Batman, look after her son, and kill the Black Glove because he is the greatest mercenary alive. And he'd take the job because he hates Nightwing. And he'd pretend to be Sexton and cover his crimes in the veneer of the Domino killer because he'd think, "So, Nightwing, you want to pretend you're Batman? Want to hide from me? Fine. I'll pretend to be someone else too. Come and get me." He wouldn't hunt Batman, he'd get "Batman" to hunt him.

That makes sense. His motivation for the elaborate ruse isn't, "I'm crazy!" His motivation for the elaborate ruse is, "I'm going to defeat you three ways in three guises at the same time, and you won't even know it's me. I want to undermine everything about you. I want to see you fail." And each disguise has purpose: He takes over Robin to betray him and kill Nightwing in his old costume. He pretends to be the Domino killer to give "Batman" a mystery to solve and advertise the murders. He pretends to be Sexton so he can be right there and watch him fail, so he can stand right next to him and not have Nightwing know. The more I think about it, the more sense it makes.

File this under: "Bitter Amateur Writer Rants". :/

And while Dick Grayson's just been treated as Bruce Wayne-lite in most of the other Bat books on the stands, I think that Morrison's added enough good character moments to make his presence noteworthy in B&R. You have this neurotic, insecure and overall friendly Batman, almost in line with his silver age incarnation, as opposed to the Frank Miller inspired, constantly narrating neo-noir caricature that's dominated Batman comics since DKR. Grayson's contrast is especially evident given the diametrically antithetical deconstructionist approach Morrison's taken to Bruce for the last 25 years, attempting to integrate elements of the thelemic superman archetype that we know he has a hard-on for. If you look, you can see tons of Crowley's influence in RIP. I agree that Damien stands out more, but that's mostly because his character is just more ostentatious. Batman is (and should be) a bit more subdued.

I totally don't get the thinking that Grayson as Batman is not that different than Bruce Wayne. He's not as cold. The whole dynamic between Batman and Robin is different in part because of that, and in part because Robin is "spunkier". He comes off as completely different to me. He's much more self conscious and uneasy.

There's certainly been elements of "This is Robin pretending to be Batman", but, for me, very little. For example, in #12, there's no difference at all. He shows up and talks to Joker and it's how Batman would've done it. It's the same. I remember reading an article at the beginning that said the switch was that Robin was serious and tough (which Damien is - he's terrific) and Batman was jokey and fun. So, to make my point: Grayson-Batman should be cavalier in the face of danger. He should be relaxing, standing his back on the wall, smirking, basically going, "I totally worked it out." He should be cocky and swashbuckling and, as he said way back in #2 or #3, showman-like. He should be really playing up the myth of Batman, that he's this over-the-top character, he should be treating it like a role and not mimicking Wayne, which what he said he wouldn't do.

I read BATMAN & ROBIN and when someone reminds me Bruce Wayne is dead and Dick Grayson's Batman, I'm shocked because I totally forgot because he's just writing Batman. I forget he's Robin. I don't particularly think that's a good thing.

That said, there is a moment in the reveal where Batman says, "Nah". Which is perfect. Batman would never say that.

Just because I'm pointing out when the ball is dropped doesn't mean I think it's bad. It isn't. I enjoyed it enough to comment. Until this moment, it's been rather lukewarm, but I really did enjoy the reveal. :)
 
Last edited:
I doubt Joker's been working for Talia.

While I think Morrison's been doing a pretty good job with B&R, I don't think it's as good as his Batman run. And what puzzles me most is his comparison to B&R as drawing on elements of David Lynch. Honestly, I don't think the comparison is fitting at all. And the funny thing is, I could see a comparison to his original Batman run and David Lynch. It has all the pieces. Weird nightmarish continuity, a cryptic and ambiguous gatekeeper, an equally ambiguous and Satanic figure working in the shadows, and a fractured and unexplained exploration of identity and reality. Really, the latter half of his Batman arc fits Lynch to a tee. B&R, not so much.

I'd guess, Bass, that the next arc or two will explain the rationale behind Joker as Sexton.
 
Last edited:
Joker and Talia working together is mostly supported by the fact that her murder of Jezebel was listed amongst the Domino killings, and that there's been such an emphasis on the fact that she has some form of mind control, foreshadowed in the most recent Batman vs. Robin arc. The more I think about it, the more I wonder if there's an actual connection, or if it is, indeed, just a red herring. Regardless, I think that it's preemptive to assume that Talia's motivation is flawed before we actually find out what it is.

And I agree that the David Lynch comparison is bogus. It's mostly comic book journalists who've given it that label, many of whom have probably never actually seen a Lynch movie. I think that they're just associating the reputations of the two creators with one another; dark, stylistic, surreal and confusing. I'd actually argue the point that Morrison's earlier Batman run fits the Lynch mold, as there's such an emphasis on reconciling Batman's 70+ years as a hero. A common theme (at least in the noir-ish Lynch films) is that there aren't any more heroes. I recently rewatched Mulholland Drive and Blue Velvet, and I think you can only superficially draw comparisons with the contemporary Morrison stuff, which is very, very appreciative of pop art. I'd be more inclined to draw a parallel between something like Arkham Asylum: A Serious House on Serious Earth and Eraserhead, actually. That I could see.
 
And I agree that the David Lynch comparison is bogus. It's mostly comic book journalists who've given it that label, many of whom have probably never actually seen a Lynch movie. I think that they're just associating the reputations of the two creators with one another; dark, stylistic, surreal and confusing. I'd actually argue the point that Morrison's earlier Batman run fits the Lynch mold, as there's such an emphasis on reconciling Batman's 70+ years as a hero. A common theme (at least in the noir-ish Lynch films) is that there aren't any more heroes. I recently rewatched Mulholland Drive and Blue Velvet, and I think you can only superficially draw comparisons with the contemporary Morrison stuff, which is very, very appreciative of pop art. I'd be more inclined to draw a parallel between something like Arkham Asylum: A Serious House on Serious Earth and Eraserhead, actually. That I could see.

I've heard Morrison make the comparison in interview, directly, so... ;) I'm not willing to let him off the hook. I could see some design sensibilities between, say, Blue Velvet and the first arc of B&R, but beyond that, I don't really buy it. But yeah. The latter half of his Batman arc is VERY Lynchian, particularly in terms of his split reality films (Muholland Dr., Lost Highway, Inland Empire).
 
I quite liked issue 13... And while Robin beating Joker with a crowbar is a bit trite, I am very intrigued by whatever Morrison is trying to do with Joker.

And I like seeing the relationship between Gordon and Grayson develop (although at this point, any implication that Gordon doesn't know who Batman is are not only ludicrous, but insulting to the character).
 
I actually quite liked the Damian/Joker part. The thought that the Joker seems to find Damian a more intriguing nemesis than Dick is great.
 
Someone please write a detailed review of #16 so I can see if I missed anything.

That was insane.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top