Ice said:See the difference is that people have a CHOICE to become a police officer. The heroes aren't having a choice to be part of the gov't or not.
They can do like Firestar and stop being superheros.
Last edited:
Ice said:See the difference is that people have a CHOICE to become a police officer. The heroes aren't having a choice to be part of the gov't or not.
And not all Police officers can be a one man army, plus isnt SHIELD still corrupted to the core?Ice said:See the difference is that people have a CHOICE to become a police officer. The heroes aren't having a choice to be part of the gov't or not.
So the next time they see a mugging they just turn the other cheek or be arrested?E.Vi.L. said:They can do like Firestar and stop being superheros.
Random said:So the next time they see a mugging they just turn the other cheek or be arrested?
Yes, Slimjim already beat you to that yesterday.thee great one said::drooling: :drooling: :drooling: :drooling:
![]()
Civil War Variant #6
ultimatedjf said:I don't know why most of you guys don't like Turner's art. It's not great, but it's still pretty good.
Maybe he's better suited for DC.
Victor Von Doom said:First of all...........In-N-Out burgers are the best fast food burgers in the WORLD. Yes....the WORLD!!!! Anyone who disagrees obviously has never had a Double Double before. Because once you have a Double Double from In-N-Out, just the sheer thought of this not being the best fast food burger you've ever tasted would cause your head to explode.
True story...I've seen it happen to a friend of mine.
Second.........Civil is a hype machine juggernaut. But in its defense--the story is very good. While there are only 2 issues to the story so far....all the tie-ins (for the most part) are great stories as well. Amazing Spiderman has been the best its been for a long time. Frontline is a great well-written tie-in. And there are others just as great.
So basically---its a lot of hype surrounding the story...but fortunately...it's delivering for now.
ShadowPrime said:Hibiki:
Sorry, but you prove my point FOR me.
Racist Man and Captain Brutality sound like villains to you? Okay. To YOU. Who gets to decide? That is precisely the point. What Cap is arguing is that once you put on a mask, you are outside the law, and answerable to no one. Well, maybe to HIM. Hmmm... So who gets to decide the limits of conduct for "heroes"? What is the code of conduct for the Punisher? For Wolverine? What if the NEXT guy in a mask doesn't share Cap's views on where the line should be drawn? On race relations? On the rights of criminals? Of the simply ACCUSED? If Captain Brutality decides that breaking a few bones to get info is justifiable, who does he answer to?
And your comments re the police are....startling...to me. Let me see if I have this right. Cap disagrees with a government policy. So Cap pitches a SHIELD agent out of a racing vehicle ... during what is essentially a jail break... right into the path of some oncoming, pursuing police cars... causing what appears to be a high speed multi car crash, with police cars sailing through the air at 60 MPH... and that is OKAY because cops are "always in the line of danger"?
Yikes.
Shadow
Mark Millar said:Great time at a friend's place in the countryside for the last week (more on this later), but had an email from Marvel marketing with some cracking sales info on the first three issues. MCW issue one is now pushing towards 400K and should surpass this with the next printing. Issue 2 is pushing 300K and orders-- initial bloody orders-- for issue three are ALREADY almost 340K. Bear in mind that re-order activity on these books is huge and I have another big surprise in this issue and it's not unrealistic to suspect that this issue might just pass the 400K mark too. I'm bloody delighted so thanks very much. Lovely news to come back to.
MaxwellSmart said:I idea behind registration is that super beings present a dangerous threat. Not all of them are dangerous, but if they are left unchecked the dangerous ones will commit attrocities like Stamford. I think it's stupid that they blame ALL super heroes for Stamford, though. Especially calling them baby killers. That's like calling all Americans baby killers because some American killed Arab Children(yes, I know they actually do call us baby killers and worse). The point is you can't be guilty by association.
They're not blaming ALL superheroes. Not exactly. They just don't want it to happen again; they don't want to take that risk ever again.MaxwellSmart said:I idea behind registration is that super beings present a dangerous threat. Not all of them are dangerous, but if they are left unchecked the dangerous ones will commit attrocities like Stamford. I think it's stupid that they blame ALL super heroes for Stamford, though. Especially calling them baby killers. That's like calling all Americans baby killers because some American killed Arab Children(yes, I know they actually do call us baby killers and worse). The point is you can't be guilty by association.
I just thought of a better analogy. Drinking. If you are someone who drinks, are you guilty of drunk driving because other people who drink drink and drive.
E said:I'm kind of "meh" about Thor. The guy is a Norse god; what does he care about the law of one country? Why would he get involved?
E said:I'm kind of "meh" about Thor. The guy is a Norse god; what does he care about the law of one country? Why would he get involved?
iceman said:big rain storm last night killed UPS. so i didn't get to read it. sounds good, though i hate the idea of the Fan Four breaking up. It makes sense though.
I like the thought of Spider-man whooping on everyone, because he should be able too. Between his smarts, speed, and strength, he is a versatile beast. While I originally thought that he would switch sides because something happens to May, my friend who runs the shop thinks it will be after he beats hte crap out of Cap.
(Iron Man winning is unnacceptable)
So since I won't read this til tomorrow, will someoen tell me what was the hint towards DD's identity.
iceman said:So since I won't read this til tomorrow, will someoen tell me what was the hint towards DD's identity.
TheManWithoutFear said:There is no hint. It's a straight up shot of the guy without his mask on. They just don't name him. Which is ridiculous because of artist interpretation, we can't tell exactly who the character is but he's right in our face.